Cargando…
Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies
Objective: To review the published studies reporting various specimen retrieval incisions being used by colorectal surgeons in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections (LCR). Methods: Standard medical electronic databases were searched to find relevant articles and a summary conclusion...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25146342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou053 |
_version_ | 1782342540864782336 |
---|---|
author | Sajid, Muhammad S. Bhatti, Muhammad I. Sains, Parv Baig, Mirza K. |
author_facet | Sajid, Muhammad S. Bhatti, Muhammad I. Sains, Parv Baig, Mirza K. |
author_sort | Sajid, Muhammad S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To review the published studies reporting various specimen retrieval incisions being used by colorectal surgeons in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections (LCR). Methods: Standard medical electronic databases were searched to find relevant articles and a summary conclusion was generated. Results: There were 43 studies reporting various approaches used for the purpose of specimen retrieval in 2388 patients undergoing LCR. The most common approaches were periumbilical midline incision (1260 reported case in the literature), transverse incision (583 reported cases in the literature) in the right- or left iliac fossa, depending on the side of colonic resection, and Pfannensteil incision (293 reported cases in the literature). Periumbilical midline incision was associated with the higher risk of developing incisional hernia (odds ratio 53.72; 95% confidence interval 7.48–386.04; Z = 3.96; P = 0.0001). In terms of surgical site infection (SSI), there was no difference between the three common approaches to specimen retrieval. Transanal and transvaginal approaches were associated with higher risk of SSI. Conclusions: Midline, transverse and Pfannensteil incisions were the most commonly used approaches for specimen retrieval following LCR. Midline incision was associated with higher risk of incisional hernia. Risk of SSI was similar in all three common approaches. The transanal and transvaginal approaches pose a higher risk of SSI. These conclusions are based on the combined outcome of published case series, case reports and comparative studies. Randomized, controlled trials with longer follow-up are required before recommending the routine use of any approach for specimen retrieval in patients undergoing LCR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4219147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42191472014-11-05 Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies Sajid, Muhammad S. Bhatti, Muhammad I. Sains, Parv Baig, Mirza K. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Reviews Objective: To review the published studies reporting various specimen retrieval incisions being used by colorectal surgeons in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections (LCR). Methods: Standard medical electronic databases were searched to find relevant articles and a summary conclusion was generated. Results: There were 43 studies reporting various approaches used for the purpose of specimen retrieval in 2388 patients undergoing LCR. The most common approaches were periumbilical midline incision (1260 reported case in the literature), transverse incision (583 reported cases in the literature) in the right- or left iliac fossa, depending on the side of colonic resection, and Pfannensteil incision (293 reported cases in the literature). Periumbilical midline incision was associated with the higher risk of developing incisional hernia (odds ratio 53.72; 95% confidence interval 7.48–386.04; Z = 3.96; P = 0.0001). In terms of surgical site infection (SSI), there was no difference between the three common approaches to specimen retrieval. Transanal and transvaginal approaches were associated with higher risk of SSI. Conclusions: Midline, transverse and Pfannensteil incisions were the most commonly used approaches for specimen retrieval following LCR. Midline incision was associated with higher risk of incisional hernia. Risk of SSI was similar in all three common approaches. The transanal and transvaginal approaches pose a higher risk of SSI. These conclusions are based on the combined outcome of published case series, case reports and comparative studies. Randomized, controlled trials with longer follow-up are required before recommending the routine use of any approach for specimen retrieval in patients undergoing LCR. Oxford University Press 2014-11 2014-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4219147/ /pubmed/25146342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou053 Text en © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press and the Digestive Science Publishing Co. Limited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Sajid, Muhammad S. Bhatti, Muhammad I. Sains, Parv Baig, Mirza K. Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies |
title | Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies |
title_full | Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies |
title_fullStr | Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies |
title_short | Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies |
title_sort | specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25146342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sajidmuhammads specimenretrievalapproachesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionsaliteraturebasedreviewofpublishedstudies AT bhattimuhammadi specimenretrievalapproachesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionsaliteraturebasedreviewofpublishedstudies AT sainsparv specimenretrievalapproachesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionsaliteraturebasedreviewofpublishedstudies AT baigmirzak specimenretrievalapproachesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccolorectalresectionsaliteraturebasedreviewofpublishedstudies |