Cargando…

Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Teamwork is a critical component during critical events. Assessment is mandatory for remediation and to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. METHODS: The primary purpose was to test the feasibility of team-based self-monitoring of crisis resource management with a va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stocker, Martin, Menadue, Lynda, Kakat, Suzan, De Costa, Kumi, Combes, Julie, Banya, Winston, Lane, Mary, Desai, Ajay, Burmester, Margarita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-22
_version_ 1782342546721079296
author Stocker, Martin
Menadue, Lynda
Kakat, Suzan
De Costa, Kumi
Combes, Julie
Banya, Winston
Lane, Mary
Desai, Ajay
Burmester, Margarita
author_facet Stocker, Martin
Menadue, Lynda
Kakat, Suzan
De Costa, Kumi
Combes, Julie
Banya, Winston
Lane, Mary
Desai, Ajay
Burmester, Margarita
author_sort Stocker, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Teamwork is a critical component during critical events. Assessment is mandatory for remediation and to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. METHODS: The primary purpose was to test the feasibility of team-based self-monitoring of crisis resource management with a validated teamwork assessment tool. A secondary purpose was to assess item-specific reliability and content validity in order to develop a modified context-optimised assessment tool. We conducted a prospective, single-centre study to assess team-based self-monitoring of teamwork after in-situ inter-professional simulated critical events by comparison with an assessment by observers. The Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS) was used as the assessment tool with evaluation of internal consistency, item-specific consensus estimates for agreement between participating teams and observers, and content validity. RESULTS: 105 participants and 58 observers completed the MHPTS after a total of 16 simulated critical events over 8 months. Summative internal consistency of the MHPTS calculated as Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable with 0.712 for observers and 0.710 for participants. Overall consensus estimates for dichotomous data (agreement/non-agreement) was 0.62 (Cohen’s kappa; IQ-range 0.31-0.87). 6/16 items had excellent (kappa > 0.8) and 3/16 good reliability (kappa > 0.6). Short questions concerning easy to observe behaviours were more likely to be reliable. The MHPTS was modified using a threshold for good reliability of kappa > 0.6. The result is a 9 item self-assessment tool (TeamMonitor) with a calculated median kappa of 0.86 (IQ-range: 0.67-1.0) and good content validity. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based self-monitoring with the MHPTS to assess team performance during simulated critical events is feasible. A context-based modification of the tool is achievable with good internal consistency and content validity. Further studies are needed to investigate if team-based self-monitoring may be used as part of a programme of assessment to target training programmes for observed performance gaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4219174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42191742014-11-05 Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study Stocker, Martin Menadue, Lynda Kakat, Suzan De Costa, Kumi Combes, Julie Banya, Winston Lane, Mary Desai, Ajay Burmester, Margarita BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Teamwork is a critical component during critical events. Assessment is mandatory for remediation and to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. METHODS: The primary purpose was to test the feasibility of team-based self-monitoring of crisis resource management with a validated teamwork assessment tool. A secondary purpose was to assess item-specific reliability and content validity in order to develop a modified context-optimised assessment tool. We conducted a prospective, single-centre study to assess team-based self-monitoring of teamwork after in-situ inter-professional simulated critical events by comparison with an assessment by observers. The Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS) was used as the assessment tool with evaluation of internal consistency, item-specific consensus estimates for agreement between participating teams and observers, and content validity. RESULTS: 105 participants and 58 observers completed the MHPTS after a total of 16 simulated critical events over 8 months. Summative internal consistency of the MHPTS calculated as Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable with 0.712 for observers and 0.710 for participants. Overall consensus estimates for dichotomous data (agreement/non-agreement) was 0.62 (Cohen’s kappa; IQ-range 0.31-0.87). 6/16 items had excellent (kappa > 0.8) and 3/16 good reliability (kappa > 0.6). Short questions concerning easy to observe behaviours were more likely to be reliable. The MHPTS was modified using a threshold for good reliability of kappa > 0.6. The result is a 9 item self-assessment tool (TeamMonitor) with a calculated median kappa of 0.86 (IQ-range: 0.67-1.0) and good content validity. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based self-monitoring with the MHPTS to assess team performance during simulated critical events is feasible. A context-based modification of the tool is achievable with good internal consistency and content validity. Further studies are needed to investigate if team-based self-monitoring may be used as part of a programme of assessment to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. BioMed Central 2013-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4219174/ /pubmed/24289232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-22 Text en Copyright © 2013 Stocker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stocker, Martin
Menadue, Lynda
Kakat, Suzan
De Costa, Kumi
Combes, Julie
Banya, Winston
Lane, Mary
Desai, Ajay
Burmester, Margarita
Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
title Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
title_full Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
title_fullStr Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
title_short Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
title_sort reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-22
work_keys_str_mv AT stockermartin reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy
AT menaduelynda reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy
AT kakatsuzan reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy
AT decostakumi reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy
AT combesjulie reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy
AT banyawinston reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy
AT lanemary reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy
AT desaiajay reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy
AT burmestermargarita reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy