Cargando…
Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
BACKGROUND: Teamwork is a critical component during critical events. Assessment is mandatory for remediation and to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. METHODS: The primary purpose was to test the feasibility of team-based self-monitoring of crisis resource management with a va...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-22 |
_version_ | 1782342546721079296 |
---|---|
author | Stocker, Martin Menadue, Lynda Kakat, Suzan De Costa, Kumi Combes, Julie Banya, Winston Lane, Mary Desai, Ajay Burmester, Margarita |
author_facet | Stocker, Martin Menadue, Lynda Kakat, Suzan De Costa, Kumi Combes, Julie Banya, Winston Lane, Mary Desai, Ajay Burmester, Margarita |
author_sort | Stocker, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Teamwork is a critical component during critical events. Assessment is mandatory for remediation and to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. METHODS: The primary purpose was to test the feasibility of team-based self-monitoring of crisis resource management with a validated teamwork assessment tool. A secondary purpose was to assess item-specific reliability and content validity in order to develop a modified context-optimised assessment tool. We conducted a prospective, single-centre study to assess team-based self-monitoring of teamwork after in-situ inter-professional simulated critical events by comparison with an assessment by observers. The Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS) was used as the assessment tool with evaluation of internal consistency, item-specific consensus estimates for agreement between participating teams and observers, and content validity. RESULTS: 105 participants and 58 observers completed the MHPTS after a total of 16 simulated critical events over 8 months. Summative internal consistency of the MHPTS calculated as Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable with 0.712 for observers and 0.710 for participants. Overall consensus estimates for dichotomous data (agreement/non-agreement) was 0.62 (Cohen’s kappa; IQ-range 0.31-0.87). 6/16 items had excellent (kappa > 0.8) and 3/16 good reliability (kappa > 0.6). Short questions concerning easy to observe behaviours were more likely to be reliable. The MHPTS was modified using a threshold for good reliability of kappa > 0.6. The result is a 9 item self-assessment tool (TeamMonitor) with a calculated median kappa of 0.86 (IQ-range: 0.67-1.0) and good content validity. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based self-monitoring with the MHPTS to assess team performance during simulated critical events is feasible. A context-based modification of the tool is achievable with good internal consistency and content validity. Further studies are needed to investigate if team-based self-monitoring may be used as part of a programme of assessment to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4219174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42191742014-11-05 Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study Stocker, Martin Menadue, Lynda Kakat, Suzan De Costa, Kumi Combes, Julie Banya, Winston Lane, Mary Desai, Ajay Burmester, Margarita BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Teamwork is a critical component during critical events. Assessment is mandatory for remediation and to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. METHODS: The primary purpose was to test the feasibility of team-based self-monitoring of crisis resource management with a validated teamwork assessment tool. A secondary purpose was to assess item-specific reliability and content validity in order to develop a modified context-optimised assessment tool. We conducted a prospective, single-centre study to assess team-based self-monitoring of teamwork after in-situ inter-professional simulated critical events by comparison with an assessment by observers. The Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS) was used as the assessment tool with evaluation of internal consistency, item-specific consensus estimates for agreement between participating teams and observers, and content validity. RESULTS: 105 participants and 58 observers completed the MHPTS after a total of 16 simulated critical events over 8 months. Summative internal consistency of the MHPTS calculated as Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable with 0.712 for observers and 0.710 for participants. Overall consensus estimates for dichotomous data (agreement/non-agreement) was 0.62 (Cohen’s kappa; IQ-range 0.31-0.87). 6/16 items had excellent (kappa > 0.8) and 3/16 good reliability (kappa > 0.6). Short questions concerning easy to observe behaviours were more likely to be reliable. The MHPTS was modified using a threshold for good reliability of kappa > 0.6. The result is a 9 item self-assessment tool (TeamMonitor) with a calculated median kappa of 0.86 (IQ-range: 0.67-1.0) and good content validity. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based self-monitoring with the MHPTS to assess team performance during simulated critical events is feasible. A context-based modification of the tool is achievable with good internal consistency and content validity. Further studies are needed to investigate if team-based self-monitoring may be used as part of a programme of assessment to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. BioMed Central 2013-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4219174/ /pubmed/24289232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-22 Text en Copyright © 2013 Stocker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stocker, Martin Menadue, Lynda Kakat, Suzan De Costa, Kumi Combes, Julie Banya, Winston Lane, Mary Desai, Ajay Burmester, Margarita Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study |
title | Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study |
title_full | Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study |
title_short | Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study |
title_sort | reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stockermartin reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy AT menaduelynda reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy AT kakatsuzan reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy AT decostakumi reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy AT combesjulie reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy AT banyawinston reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy AT lanemary reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy AT desaiajay reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy AT burmestermargarita reliabilityofteambasedselfmonitoringincriticaleventsapilotstudy |