Cargando…
In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors
Symbiosis is often characterized by co-evolutionary changes in the genomes of the partners involved. An understanding of these changes can provide insight into the nature of the relationship, including the mechanisms that initiate and maintain an association between organisms. In this study we exami...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25408687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00576 |
_version_ | 1782342577871126528 |
---|---|
author | Newell, Peter D. Chaston, John M. Wang, Yiping Winans, Nathan J. Sannino, David R. Wong, Adam C. N. Dobson, Adam J. Kagle, Jeanne Douglas, Angela E. |
author_facet | Newell, Peter D. Chaston, John M. Wang, Yiping Winans, Nathan J. Sannino, David R. Wong, Adam C. N. Dobson, Adam J. Kagle, Jeanne Douglas, Angela E. |
author_sort | Newell, Peter D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Symbiosis is often characterized by co-evolutionary changes in the genomes of the partners involved. An understanding of these changes can provide insight into the nature of the relationship, including the mechanisms that initiate and maintain an association between organisms. In this study we examined the genome sequences of bacteria isolated from the Drosophila melanogaster gut with the objective of identifying genes that are important for function in the host. We compared microbiota isolates with con-specific or closely related bacterial species isolated from non-fly environments. First the phenotype of germ-free Drosophila (axenic flies) was compared to that of flies colonized with specific bacteria (gnotobiotic flies) as a measure of symbiotic function. Non-fly isolates were functionally distinct from bacteria isolated from flies, conferring slower development and an altered nutrient profile in the host, traits known to be microbiota-dependent. Comparative genomic methods were next employed to identify putative symbiosis factors: genes found in bacteria that restore microbiota-dependent traits to gnotobiotic flies, but absent from those that do not. Factors identified include riboflavin synthesis and stress resistance. We also used a phylogenomic approach to identify protein coding genes for which fly-isolate sequences were more similar to each other than to other sequences, reasoning that these genes may have a shared function unique to the fly environment. This method identified genes in Acetobacter species that cluster in two distinct genomic loci: one predicted to be involved in oxidative stress detoxification and another encoding an efflux pump. In summary, we leveraged genomic and in vivo functional comparisons to identify candidate traits that distinguish symbiotic bacteria. These candidates can serve as the basis for further work investigating the genetic requirements of bacteria for function and persistence in the Drosophila gut. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4219406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42194062014-11-18 In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors Newell, Peter D. Chaston, John M. Wang, Yiping Winans, Nathan J. Sannino, David R. Wong, Adam C. N. Dobson, Adam J. Kagle, Jeanne Douglas, Angela E. Front Microbiol Microbiology Symbiosis is often characterized by co-evolutionary changes in the genomes of the partners involved. An understanding of these changes can provide insight into the nature of the relationship, including the mechanisms that initiate and maintain an association between organisms. In this study we examined the genome sequences of bacteria isolated from the Drosophila melanogaster gut with the objective of identifying genes that are important for function in the host. We compared microbiota isolates with con-specific or closely related bacterial species isolated from non-fly environments. First the phenotype of germ-free Drosophila (axenic flies) was compared to that of flies colonized with specific bacteria (gnotobiotic flies) as a measure of symbiotic function. Non-fly isolates were functionally distinct from bacteria isolated from flies, conferring slower development and an altered nutrient profile in the host, traits known to be microbiota-dependent. Comparative genomic methods were next employed to identify putative symbiosis factors: genes found in bacteria that restore microbiota-dependent traits to gnotobiotic flies, but absent from those that do not. Factors identified include riboflavin synthesis and stress resistance. We also used a phylogenomic approach to identify protein coding genes for which fly-isolate sequences were more similar to each other than to other sequences, reasoning that these genes may have a shared function unique to the fly environment. This method identified genes in Acetobacter species that cluster in two distinct genomic loci: one predicted to be involved in oxidative stress detoxification and another encoding an efflux pump. In summary, we leveraged genomic and in vivo functional comparisons to identify candidate traits that distinguish symbiotic bacteria. These candidates can serve as the basis for further work investigating the genetic requirements of bacteria for function and persistence in the Drosophila gut. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4219406/ /pubmed/25408687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00576 Text en Copyright © 2014 Newell, Chaston, Wang, Winans, Sannino, Wong, Dobson, Kagle and Douglas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Newell, Peter D. Chaston, John M. Wang, Yiping Winans, Nathan J. Sannino, David R. Wong, Adam C. N. Dobson, Adam J. Kagle, Jeanne Douglas, Angela E. In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors |
title | In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors |
title_full | In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors |
title_fullStr | In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors |
title_full_unstemmed | In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors |
title_short | In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors |
title_sort | in vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25408687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT newellpeterd invivofunctionandcomparativegenomicanalysesofthedrosophilagutmicrobiotaidentifycandidatesymbiosisfactors AT chastonjohnm invivofunctionandcomparativegenomicanalysesofthedrosophilagutmicrobiotaidentifycandidatesymbiosisfactors AT wangyiping invivofunctionandcomparativegenomicanalysesofthedrosophilagutmicrobiotaidentifycandidatesymbiosisfactors AT winansnathanj invivofunctionandcomparativegenomicanalysesofthedrosophilagutmicrobiotaidentifycandidatesymbiosisfactors AT sanninodavidr invivofunctionandcomparativegenomicanalysesofthedrosophilagutmicrobiotaidentifycandidatesymbiosisfactors AT wongadamcn invivofunctionandcomparativegenomicanalysesofthedrosophilagutmicrobiotaidentifycandidatesymbiosisfactors AT dobsonadamj invivofunctionandcomparativegenomicanalysesofthedrosophilagutmicrobiotaidentifycandidatesymbiosisfactors AT kaglejeanne invivofunctionandcomparativegenomicanalysesofthedrosophilagutmicrobiotaidentifycandidatesymbiosisfactors AT douglasangelae invivofunctionandcomparativegenomicanalysesofthedrosophilagutmicrobiotaidentifycandidatesymbiosisfactors |