Cargando…

Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error

The processes underlying short-term plasticity induced by visuomotor adaptation to a shifted visual field are still debated. Two main sources of error can induce motor adaptation: reaching feedback errors, which correspond to visually perceived discrepancies between hand and target positions, and er...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaveau, Valérie, Prablanc, Claude, Laurent, Damien, Rossetti, Yves, Priot, Anne-Emmanuelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25408644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00880
_version_ 1782342580887879680
author Gaveau, Valérie
Prablanc, Claude
Laurent, Damien
Rossetti, Yves
Priot, Anne-Emmanuelle
author_facet Gaveau, Valérie
Prablanc, Claude
Laurent, Damien
Rossetti, Yves
Priot, Anne-Emmanuelle
author_sort Gaveau, Valérie
collection PubMed
description The processes underlying short-term plasticity induced by visuomotor adaptation to a shifted visual field are still debated. Two main sources of error can induce motor adaptation: reaching feedback errors, which correspond to visually perceived discrepancies between hand and target positions, and errors between predicted and actual visual reafferences of the moving hand. These two sources of error are closely intertwined and difficult to disentangle, as both the target and the reaching limb are simultaneously visible. Accordingly, the goal of the present study was to clarify the relative contributions of these two types of errors during a pointing task under prism-displaced vision. In “terminal feedback error” condition, viewing of their hand by subjects was allowed only at movement end, simultaneously with viewing of the target. In “movement prediction error” condition, viewing of the hand was limited to movement duration, in the absence of any visual target, and error signals arose solely from comparisons between predicted and actual reafferences of the hand. In order to prevent intentional corrections of errors, a subthreshold, progressive stepwise increase in prism deviation was used, so that subjects remained unaware of the visual deviation applied in both conditions. An adaptive aftereffect was observed in the “terminal feedback error” condition only. As far as subjects remained unaware of the optical deviation and self-assigned pointing errors, prediction error alone was insufficient to induce adaptation. These results indicate a critical role of hand-to-target feedback error signals in visuomotor adaptation; consistent with recent neurophysiological findings, they suggest that a combination of feedback and prediction error signals is necessary for eliciting aftereffects. They also suggest that feedback error updates the prediction of reafferences when a visual perturbation is introduced gradually and cognitive factors are eliminated or strongly attenuated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4219430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42194302014-11-18 Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error Gaveau, Valérie Prablanc, Claude Laurent, Damien Rossetti, Yves Priot, Anne-Emmanuelle Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The processes underlying short-term plasticity induced by visuomotor adaptation to a shifted visual field are still debated. Two main sources of error can induce motor adaptation: reaching feedback errors, which correspond to visually perceived discrepancies between hand and target positions, and errors between predicted and actual visual reafferences of the moving hand. These two sources of error are closely intertwined and difficult to disentangle, as both the target and the reaching limb are simultaneously visible. Accordingly, the goal of the present study was to clarify the relative contributions of these two types of errors during a pointing task under prism-displaced vision. In “terminal feedback error” condition, viewing of their hand by subjects was allowed only at movement end, simultaneously with viewing of the target. In “movement prediction error” condition, viewing of the hand was limited to movement duration, in the absence of any visual target, and error signals arose solely from comparisons between predicted and actual reafferences of the hand. In order to prevent intentional corrections of errors, a subthreshold, progressive stepwise increase in prism deviation was used, so that subjects remained unaware of the visual deviation applied in both conditions. An adaptive aftereffect was observed in the “terminal feedback error” condition only. As far as subjects remained unaware of the optical deviation and self-assigned pointing errors, prediction error alone was insufficient to induce adaptation. These results indicate a critical role of hand-to-target feedback error signals in visuomotor adaptation; consistent with recent neurophysiological findings, they suggest that a combination of feedback and prediction error signals is necessary for eliciting aftereffects. They also suggest that feedback error updates the prediction of reafferences when a visual perturbation is introduced gradually and cognitive factors are eliminated or strongly attenuated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4219430/ /pubmed/25408644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00880 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gaveau, Prablanc, Laurent, Rossetti and Priot. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Gaveau, Valérie
Prablanc, Claude
Laurent, Damien
Rossetti, Yves
Priot, Anne-Emmanuelle
Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error
title Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error
title_full Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error
title_fullStr Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error
title_full_unstemmed Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error
title_short Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error
title_sort visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25408644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00880
work_keys_str_mv AT gaveauvalerie visuomotoradaptationneedsavalidationofpredictionerrorbyfeedbackerror
AT prablancclaude visuomotoradaptationneedsavalidationofpredictionerrorbyfeedbackerror
AT laurentdamien visuomotoradaptationneedsavalidationofpredictionerrorbyfeedbackerror
AT rossettiyves visuomotoradaptationneedsavalidationofpredictionerrorbyfeedbackerror
AT priotanneemmanuelle visuomotoradaptationneedsavalidationofpredictionerrorbyfeedbackerror