Cargando…

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians

BACKGROUND: Equations to estimate GFR have not been well validated in the elderly and may misclassify persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We measured GFR and compared the performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CK...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopes, Marcelo B, Araújo, Lara Q, Passos, Michelle T, Nishida, Sonia K, Kirsztajn, Gianna M, Cendoroglo, Maysa S, Sesso, Ricardo C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24295505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-14-265
_version_ 1782342582559309824
author Lopes, Marcelo B
Araújo, Lara Q
Passos, Michelle T
Nishida, Sonia K
Kirsztajn, Gianna M
Cendoroglo, Maysa S
Sesso, Ricardo C
author_facet Lopes, Marcelo B
Araújo, Lara Q
Passos, Michelle T
Nishida, Sonia K
Kirsztajn, Gianna M
Cendoroglo, Maysa S
Sesso, Ricardo C
author_sort Lopes, Marcelo B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Equations to estimate GFR have not been well validated in the elderly and may misclassify persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We measured GFR and compared the performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-Epi) and the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) equations based on creatinine and/or cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians. METHODS: Using cross-sectional analysis we assessed 95 very elderly persons (mean 85 years) living in the community. GFR was measured by iohexol (mGFR) and compared with estimates using six equations: MDRD, CKD-Epi_creatinine, CKD-Epi_cystatin, CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine and BIS_creatinine-cystatin. RESULTS: Mean mGFR was 55 (range,19–86) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Bias was smaller with the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin and the CKD-Epi_creatinine equations (-4.0 and 1.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Accuracy (percentage of estimates within 30% of mGFR) was greater with the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine-cystatin and BIS_creatinine equations (85%, 83% and 80%, respectively). Among the creatinine-based equations, the BIS_creatinine had the greatest accuracy at mGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and the CKD-Epi_creatinine was superior at higher GFRs (79% and 90%, respectively). The CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine-cystatin and CKD-Epi_cystatin equations yielded the greatest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve at GFR threshold = 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (0.88, 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). In participants classified based on the BIS_creatinine, CKD-Epi_cystatin, or BIS_creatinine-cystatin equations, the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin equation tended to improve CKD classification (net reclassification index: 12.7%, p = 0.18; 6.7%, p = 0.38; and 15.9%; p = 0.08, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: GFR-estimating equations CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin and BIS_creatinine-cystatin showed better accuracy than other equations using creatinine or cystatin C alone in very elderly persons. The CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin equation appears to be advantageous in CKD classification. If cystatin C is not available, both the BIS_cr equation and the CKD-Epi_cr equation could be used, although at mGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), the BIS_cr equation seems to be the best alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4219437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42194372014-11-05 Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians Lopes, Marcelo B Araújo, Lara Q Passos, Michelle T Nishida, Sonia K Kirsztajn, Gianna M Cendoroglo, Maysa S Sesso, Ricardo C BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Equations to estimate GFR have not been well validated in the elderly and may misclassify persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We measured GFR and compared the performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-Epi) and the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) equations based on creatinine and/or cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians. METHODS: Using cross-sectional analysis we assessed 95 very elderly persons (mean 85 years) living in the community. GFR was measured by iohexol (mGFR) and compared with estimates using six equations: MDRD, CKD-Epi_creatinine, CKD-Epi_cystatin, CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine and BIS_creatinine-cystatin. RESULTS: Mean mGFR was 55 (range,19–86) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Bias was smaller with the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin and the CKD-Epi_creatinine equations (-4.0 and 1.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Accuracy (percentage of estimates within 30% of mGFR) was greater with the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine-cystatin and BIS_creatinine equations (85%, 83% and 80%, respectively). Among the creatinine-based equations, the BIS_creatinine had the greatest accuracy at mGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and the CKD-Epi_creatinine was superior at higher GFRs (79% and 90%, respectively). The CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine-cystatin and CKD-Epi_cystatin equations yielded the greatest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve at GFR threshold = 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (0.88, 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). In participants classified based on the BIS_creatinine, CKD-Epi_cystatin, or BIS_creatinine-cystatin equations, the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin equation tended to improve CKD classification (net reclassification index: 12.7%, p = 0.18; 6.7%, p = 0.38; and 15.9%; p = 0.08, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: GFR-estimating equations CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin and BIS_creatinine-cystatin showed better accuracy than other equations using creatinine or cystatin C alone in very elderly persons. The CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin equation appears to be advantageous in CKD classification. If cystatin C is not available, both the BIS_cr equation and the CKD-Epi_cr equation could be used, although at mGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), the BIS_cr equation seems to be the best alternative. BioMed Central 2013-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4219437/ /pubmed/24295505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-14-265 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lopes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lopes, Marcelo B
Araújo, Lara Q
Passos, Michelle T
Nishida, Sonia K
Kirsztajn, Gianna M
Cendoroglo, Maysa S
Sesso, Ricardo C
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians
title Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians
title_full Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians
title_fullStr Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians
title_short Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians
title_sort estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin c in octogenarians and nonagenarians
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24295505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-14-265
work_keys_str_mv AT lopesmarcelob estimationofglomerularfiltrationratefromserumcreatinineandcystatincinoctogenariansandnonagenarians
AT araujolaraq estimationofglomerularfiltrationratefromserumcreatinineandcystatincinoctogenariansandnonagenarians
AT passosmichellet estimationofglomerularfiltrationratefromserumcreatinineandcystatincinoctogenariansandnonagenarians
AT nishidasoniak estimationofglomerularfiltrationratefromserumcreatinineandcystatincinoctogenariansandnonagenarians
AT kirsztajngiannam estimationofglomerularfiltrationratefromserumcreatinineandcystatincinoctogenariansandnonagenarians
AT cendoroglomaysas estimationofglomerularfiltrationratefromserumcreatinineandcystatincinoctogenariansandnonagenarians
AT sessoricardoc estimationofglomerularfiltrationratefromserumcreatinineandcystatincinoctogenariansandnonagenarians