Cargando…

A cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a sample of Finnish 18- to 64-year-old men

BACKGROUND: The biological risk factors of inactivity and poor cardiorespiratory fitness are well established. However, risk groups are hard to reach and they may have misperceptions of their need for change. This study explored self-ratings of physical fitness (PF) and the relationship between obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaasalainen, Karoliina S, Kasila, Kirsti, Villberg, Jari, Komulainen, Jyrki, Poskiparta, Marita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1113
_version_ 1782342599939457024
author Kaasalainen, Karoliina S
Kasila, Kirsti
Villberg, Jari
Komulainen, Jyrki
Poskiparta, Marita
author_facet Kaasalainen, Karoliina S
Kasila, Kirsti
Villberg, Jari
Komulainen, Jyrki
Poskiparta, Marita
author_sort Kaasalainen, Karoliina S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The biological risk factors of inactivity and poor cardiorespiratory fitness are well established. However, risk groups are hard to reach and they may have misperceptions of their need for change. This study explored self-ratings of physical fitness (PF) and the relationship between objectively estimated physical fitness (PFI) and psychosocial factors among Finnish men of working-age. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on 899 Finnish men (aged 18–64) were collected in 2011. Health- related physical fitness was evaluated with a physical fitness index calculated from the results of selected fitness tests. The men were subsequently classified into three groups: low, moderate and high PFI. Psychosocial factors and self-rated fitness were elicited in the questionnaire. The data were analysed with crosstabulations, chi square-test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One-fifth of the participants had low PFI. Forty-five per cent of the low-fit middle-aged (35–49 years) men self-reported poor PF, while 80 per cent of the younger (18–34 years) low-fit men self-reported moderate or good PF. The health benefits and recommended dose of physical activity were well known in all the PFI categories. The low-fit men were health conscious, but lacked adequate exercise skills, self-efficacy and social support. However, logistic regressions revealed that, in the younger men, likelihood of better knowledge was not related to higher PFI. Among the 50-to-64-year-old men, high PFI was not associated with a higher social support. CONCLUSIONS: Poor exercise skills, self-efficacy and social support were related to low PFI. Physical activity promotion for low-fit men should take into account age differences in the relationship between psychosocial factors and physical fitness. Thus, new and effective ways to establish social support and motivation for physical activity among low-fit men in all working-age groups are needed. Further research is also warranted on whether estimation of PFI could be used as a practical health counselling tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4219528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42195282014-11-05 A cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a sample of Finnish 18- to 64-year-old men Kaasalainen, Karoliina S Kasila, Kirsti Villberg, Jari Komulainen, Jyrki Poskiparta, Marita BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The biological risk factors of inactivity and poor cardiorespiratory fitness are well established. However, risk groups are hard to reach and they may have misperceptions of their need for change. This study explored self-ratings of physical fitness (PF) and the relationship between objectively estimated physical fitness (PFI) and psychosocial factors among Finnish men of working-age. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on 899 Finnish men (aged 18–64) were collected in 2011. Health- related physical fitness was evaluated with a physical fitness index calculated from the results of selected fitness tests. The men were subsequently classified into three groups: low, moderate and high PFI. Psychosocial factors and self-rated fitness were elicited in the questionnaire. The data were analysed with crosstabulations, chi square-test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One-fifth of the participants had low PFI. Forty-five per cent of the low-fit middle-aged (35–49 years) men self-reported poor PF, while 80 per cent of the younger (18–34 years) low-fit men self-reported moderate or good PF. The health benefits and recommended dose of physical activity were well known in all the PFI categories. The low-fit men were health conscious, but lacked adequate exercise skills, self-efficacy and social support. However, logistic regressions revealed that, in the younger men, likelihood of better knowledge was not related to higher PFI. Among the 50-to-64-year-old men, high PFI was not associated with a higher social support. CONCLUSIONS: Poor exercise skills, self-efficacy and social support were related to low PFI. Physical activity promotion for low-fit men should take into account age differences in the relationship between psychosocial factors and physical fitness. Thus, new and effective ways to establish social support and motivation for physical activity among low-fit men in all working-age groups are needed. Further research is also warranted on whether estimation of PFI could be used as a practical health counselling tool. BioMed Central 2013-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4219528/ /pubmed/24289531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1113 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kaasalainen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaasalainen, Karoliina S
Kasila, Kirsti
Villberg, Jari
Komulainen, Jyrki
Poskiparta, Marita
A cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a sample of Finnish 18- to 64-year-old men
title A cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a sample of Finnish 18- to 64-year-old men
title_full A cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a sample of Finnish 18- to 64-year-old men
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a sample of Finnish 18- to 64-year-old men
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a sample of Finnish 18- to 64-year-old men
title_short A cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a sample of Finnish 18- to 64-year-old men
title_sort cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a sample of finnish 18- to 64-year-old men
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1113
work_keys_str_mv AT kaasalainenkaroliinas acrosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen
AT kasilakirsti acrosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen
AT villbergjari acrosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen
AT komulainenjyrki acrosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen
AT poskipartamarita acrosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen
AT kaasalainenkaroliinas crosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen
AT kasilakirsti crosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen
AT villbergjari crosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen
AT komulainenjyrki crosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen
AT poskipartamarita crosssectionalstudyoflowphysicalfitnessselfratedfitnessandpsychosocialfactorsinasampleoffinnish18to64yearoldmen