Cargando…
Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Following the approval of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in several European countries for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents with an inadequate response to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment, the aim of the present analysis was t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25378930 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S68273 |
_version_ | 1782342602247372800 |
---|---|
author | Coghill, David R Banaschewski, Tobias Lecendreux, Michel Soutullo, César Zuddas, Alessandro Adeyi, Ben Sorooshian, Shaw |
author_facet | Coghill, David R Banaschewski, Tobias Lecendreux, Michel Soutullo, César Zuddas, Alessandro Adeyi, Ben Sorooshian, Shaw |
author_sort | Coghill, David R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Following the approval of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in several European countries for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents with an inadequate response to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment, the aim of the present analysis was to establish the response to LDX in subgroups of patients with different ADHD medication histories. METHODS: This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of data from a 7-week, European, double-blind, dose-optimized, Phase III study. Patients aged 6–17 years were randomized 1:1:1 to LDX, placebo, or osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH). OROS-MPH was included as a reference arm rather than as a direct comparator. Efficacy was assessed in patients categorized according to their ADHD medication history using the ADHD Rating Scale IV and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. RESULTS: The difference between active drug and placebo in least-squares mean change from baseline to endpoint in ADHD Rating Scale IV total score (95% confidence interval) was similar between the overall study population (n=317; LDX, −18.6 [−21.5, −15.7]; OROS-MPH, −13.0 [−15.9, −10.2]) and treatment-naïve individuals (n=147; LDX, −15.1 [−19.4, −10.9]; OROS-MPH, −12.7 [−16.8, −8.5]) or patients previously treated with any ADHD medication (n=170; LDX, −21.5 [−25.5, −17.6]; OROS-MPH, −14.2 [−18.1, −10.3]). In addition, similar proportions of patients receiving active treatment were categorized as improved based on CGI-I score (CGI-I of 1 or 2) in the overall study population and among treatment-naïve individuals or patients previously treated with any ADHD medication. CONCLUSION: In these post hoc analyses, the response to LDX treatment, and to the reference treatment OROS-MPH, was similar to that observed for the overall study population in subgroups of patients categorized according to whether or not they had previously received ADHD medication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4219557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42195572014-11-06 Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial Coghill, David R Banaschewski, Tobias Lecendreux, Michel Soutullo, César Zuddas, Alessandro Adeyi, Ben Sorooshian, Shaw Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research BACKGROUND: Following the approval of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in several European countries for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents with an inadequate response to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment, the aim of the present analysis was to establish the response to LDX in subgroups of patients with different ADHD medication histories. METHODS: This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of data from a 7-week, European, double-blind, dose-optimized, Phase III study. Patients aged 6–17 years were randomized 1:1:1 to LDX, placebo, or osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH). OROS-MPH was included as a reference arm rather than as a direct comparator. Efficacy was assessed in patients categorized according to their ADHD medication history using the ADHD Rating Scale IV and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. RESULTS: The difference between active drug and placebo in least-squares mean change from baseline to endpoint in ADHD Rating Scale IV total score (95% confidence interval) was similar between the overall study population (n=317; LDX, −18.6 [−21.5, −15.7]; OROS-MPH, −13.0 [−15.9, −10.2]) and treatment-naïve individuals (n=147; LDX, −15.1 [−19.4, −10.9]; OROS-MPH, −12.7 [−16.8, −8.5]) or patients previously treated with any ADHD medication (n=170; LDX, −21.5 [−25.5, −17.6]; OROS-MPH, −14.2 [−18.1, −10.3]). In addition, similar proportions of patients receiving active treatment were categorized as improved based on CGI-I score (CGI-I of 1 or 2) in the overall study population and among treatment-naïve individuals or patients previously treated with any ADHD medication. CONCLUSION: In these post hoc analyses, the response to LDX treatment, and to the reference treatment OROS-MPH, was similar to that observed for the overall study population in subgroups of patients categorized according to whether or not they had previously received ADHD medication. Dove Medical Press 2014-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4219557/ /pubmed/25378930 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S68273 Text en © 2014 Coghill et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Coghill, David R Banaschewski, Tobias Lecendreux, Michel Soutullo, César Zuddas, Alessandro Adeyi, Ben Sorooshian, Shaw Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial |
title | Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial |
title_full | Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial |
title_short | Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial |
title_sort | post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25378930 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S68273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coghilldavidr posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT banaschewskitobias posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lecendreuxmichel posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT soutullocesar posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zuddasalessandro posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT adeyiben posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sorooshianshaw posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial |