Cargando…

Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Following the approval of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in several European countries for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents with an inadequate response to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment, the aim of the present analysis was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coghill, David R, Banaschewski, Tobias, Lecendreux, Michel, Soutullo, César, Zuddas, Alessandro, Adeyi, Ben, Sorooshian, Shaw
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25378930
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S68273
_version_ 1782342602247372800
author Coghill, David R
Banaschewski, Tobias
Lecendreux, Michel
Soutullo, César
Zuddas, Alessandro
Adeyi, Ben
Sorooshian, Shaw
author_facet Coghill, David R
Banaschewski, Tobias
Lecendreux, Michel
Soutullo, César
Zuddas, Alessandro
Adeyi, Ben
Sorooshian, Shaw
author_sort Coghill, David R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Following the approval of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in several European countries for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents with an inadequate response to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment, the aim of the present analysis was to establish the response to LDX in subgroups of patients with different ADHD medication histories. METHODS: This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of data from a 7-week, European, double-blind, dose-optimized, Phase III study. Patients aged 6–17 years were randomized 1:1:1 to LDX, placebo, or osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH). OROS-MPH was included as a reference arm rather than as a direct comparator. Efficacy was assessed in patients categorized according to their ADHD medication history using the ADHD Rating Scale IV and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. RESULTS: The difference between active drug and placebo in least-squares mean change from baseline to endpoint in ADHD Rating Scale IV total score (95% confidence interval) was similar between the overall study population (n=317; LDX, −18.6 [−21.5, −15.7]; OROS-MPH, −13.0 [−15.9, −10.2]) and treatment-naïve individuals (n=147; LDX, −15.1 [−19.4, −10.9]; OROS-MPH, −12.7 [−16.8, −8.5]) or patients previously treated with any ADHD medication (n=170; LDX, −21.5 [−25.5, −17.6]; OROS-MPH, −14.2 [−18.1, −10.3]). In addition, similar proportions of patients receiving active treatment were categorized as improved based on CGI-I score (CGI-I of 1 or 2) in the overall study population and among treatment-naïve individuals or patients previously treated with any ADHD medication. CONCLUSION: In these post hoc analyses, the response to LDX treatment, and to the reference treatment OROS-MPH, was similar to that observed for the overall study population in subgroups of patients categorized according to whether or not they had previously received ADHD medication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4219557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42195572014-11-06 Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial Coghill, David R Banaschewski, Tobias Lecendreux, Michel Soutullo, César Zuddas, Alessandro Adeyi, Ben Sorooshian, Shaw Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research BACKGROUND: Following the approval of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in several European countries for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents with an inadequate response to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment, the aim of the present analysis was to establish the response to LDX in subgroups of patients with different ADHD medication histories. METHODS: This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of data from a 7-week, European, double-blind, dose-optimized, Phase III study. Patients aged 6–17 years were randomized 1:1:1 to LDX, placebo, or osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH). OROS-MPH was included as a reference arm rather than as a direct comparator. Efficacy was assessed in patients categorized according to their ADHD medication history using the ADHD Rating Scale IV and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. RESULTS: The difference between active drug and placebo in least-squares mean change from baseline to endpoint in ADHD Rating Scale IV total score (95% confidence interval) was similar between the overall study population (n=317; LDX, −18.6 [−21.5, −15.7]; OROS-MPH, −13.0 [−15.9, −10.2]) and treatment-naïve individuals (n=147; LDX, −15.1 [−19.4, −10.9]; OROS-MPH, −12.7 [−16.8, −8.5]) or patients previously treated with any ADHD medication (n=170; LDX, −21.5 [−25.5, −17.6]; OROS-MPH, −14.2 [−18.1, −10.3]). In addition, similar proportions of patients receiving active treatment were categorized as improved based on CGI-I score (CGI-I of 1 or 2) in the overall study population and among treatment-naïve individuals or patients previously treated with any ADHD medication. CONCLUSION: In these post hoc analyses, the response to LDX treatment, and to the reference treatment OROS-MPH, was similar to that observed for the overall study population in subgroups of patients categorized according to whether or not they had previously received ADHD medication. Dove Medical Press 2014-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4219557/ /pubmed/25378930 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S68273 Text en © 2014 Coghill et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Coghill, David R
Banaschewski, Tobias
Lecendreux, Michel
Soutullo, César
Zuddas, Alessandro
Adeyi, Ben
Sorooshian, Shaw
Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial
title Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial
title_full Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial
title_short Post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial
title_sort post hoc analyses of the impact of previous medication on the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a randomized, controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25378930
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S68273
work_keys_str_mv AT coghilldavidr posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT banaschewskitobias posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lecendreuxmichel posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT soutullocesar posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zuddasalessandro posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT adeyiben posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sorooshianshaw posthocanalysesoftheimpactofpreviousmedicationontheefficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinarandomizedcontrolledtrial