Cargando…

The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the reliability of muscle performance tests using cost- and time-effective methods similar to those used in clinical practice. When conducting reliability studies, great effort goes into standardising test procedures to facilitate a stable outcome. Therefore, seve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juul, Tina, Langberg, Henning, Enoch, Flemming, Søgaard, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24299621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-339
_version_ 1782342604935921664
author Juul, Tina
Langberg, Henning
Enoch, Flemming
Søgaard, Karen
author_facet Juul, Tina
Langberg, Henning
Enoch, Flemming
Søgaard, Karen
author_sort Juul, Tina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigates the reliability of muscle performance tests using cost- and time-effective methods similar to those used in clinical practice. When conducting reliability studies, great effort goes into standardising test procedures to facilitate a stable outcome. Therefore, several test trials are often performed. However, when muscle performance tests are applied in the clinical setting, clinicians often only conduct a muscle performance test once as repeated testing may produce fatigue and pain, thus variation in test results. We aimed to investigate whether cervical muscle performance tests, which have shown promising psychometric properties, would remain reliable when examined under conditions similar to those of daily clinical practice. METHODS: The intra-rater (between-day) and inter-rater (within-day) reliability was assessed for five cervical muscle performance tests in patients with (n = 33) and without neck pain (n = 30). The five tests were joint position error, the cranio-cervical flexion test, the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in supine and in a 45°-upright position and a new neck extensor test. RESULTS: Intra-rater reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect agreement for joint position error (ICC ≥ 0.48-0.82), the cranio-cervical flexion test (ICC ≥ 0.69), the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in supine (ICC ≥ 0.68) and in a 45°-upright position (ICC ≥ 0.41) with the exception of a new test (neck extensor test), which ranged from slight to moderate agreement (ICC = 0.14-0.41). Likewise, inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect agreement for joint position error (ICC ≥ 0.51-0.75), the cranio-cervical flexion test (ICC ≥ 0.85), the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in supine (ICC ≥ 0.70) and in a 45°-upright position (ICC ≥ 0.56). However, only slight to fair agreement was found for the neck extensor test (ICC = 0.19-0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect agreement with the exception of a new test (neck extensor test), which ranged from slight to moderate agreement. The significant variability observed suggests that tests like the neck extensor test and the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in a 45°-upright position are too unstable to be used when evaluating neck muscle performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4219589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42195892014-11-05 The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain Juul, Tina Langberg, Henning Enoch, Flemming Søgaard, Karen BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: This study investigates the reliability of muscle performance tests using cost- and time-effective methods similar to those used in clinical practice. When conducting reliability studies, great effort goes into standardising test procedures to facilitate a stable outcome. Therefore, several test trials are often performed. However, when muscle performance tests are applied in the clinical setting, clinicians often only conduct a muscle performance test once as repeated testing may produce fatigue and pain, thus variation in test results. We aimed to investigate whether cervical muscle performance tests, which have shown promising psychometric properties, would remain reliable when examined under conditions similar to those of daily clinical practice. METHODS: The intra-rater (between-day) and inter-rater (within-day) reliability was assessed for five cervical muscle performance tests in patients with (n = 33) and without neck pain (n = 30). The five tests were joint position error, the cranio-cervical flexion test, the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in supine and in a 45°-upright position and a new neck extensor test. RESULTS: Intra-rater reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect agreement for joint position error (ICC ≥ 0.48-0.82), the cranio-cervical flexion test (ICC ≥ 0.69), the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in supine (ICC ≥ 0.68) and in a 45°-upright position (ICC ≥ 0.41) with the exception of a new test (neck extensor test), which ranged from slight to moderate agreement (ICC = 0.14-0.41). Likewise, inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect agreement for joint position error (ICC ≥ 0.51-0.75), the cranio-cervical flexion test (ICC ≥ 0.85), the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in supine (ICC ≥ 0.70) and in a 45°-upright position (ICC ≥ 0.56). However, only slight to fair agreement was found for the neck extensor test (ICC = 0.19-0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect agreement with the exception of a new test (neck extensor test), which ranged from slight to moderate agreement. The significant variability observed suggests that tests like the neck extensor test and the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in a 45°-upright position are too unstable to be used when evaluating neck muscle performance. BioMed Central 2013-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4219589/ /pubmed/24299621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-339 Text en Copyright © 2013 Juul et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Juul, Tina
Langberg, Henning
Enoch, Flemming
Søgaard, Karen
The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
title The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
title_full The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
title_fullStr The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
title_full_unstemmed The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
title_short The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
title_sort intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24299621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-339
work_keys_str_mv AT juultina theintraandinterraterreliabilityoffiveclinicalmuscleperformancetestsinpatientswithandwithoutneckpain
AT langberghenning theintraandinterraterreliabilityoffiveclinicalmuscleperformancetestsinpatientswithandwithoutneckpain
AT enochflemming theintraandinterraterreliabilityoffiveclinicalmuscleperformancetestsinpatientswithandwithoutneckpain
AT søgaardkaren theintraandinterraterreliabilityoffiveclinicalmuscleperformancetestsinpatientswithandwithoutneckpain
AT juultina intraandinterraterreliabilityoffiveclinicalmuscleperformancetestsinpatientswithandwithoutneckpain
AT langberghenning intraandinterraterreliabilityoffiveclinicalmuscleperformancetestsinpatientswithandwithoutneckpain
AT enochflemming intraandinterraterreliabilityoffiveclinicalmuscleperformancetestsinpatientswithandwithoutneckpain
AT søgaardkaren intraandinterraterreliabilityoffiveclinicalmuscleperformancetestsinpatientswithandwithoutneckpain