Cargando…

Patients’ perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Stool specimen collection is challenging and informal feedback has indicated that participants find the process difficult. Increasing stool specimen returns would improve the investigation of outbreaks of diarrhoeal and food-borne disease. AIM: To explore the barriers to stool sample col...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lecky, Donna M, Hawking, Meredith KD, McNulty, Cliodna AM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25348992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682261
_version_ 1782342706176983040
author Lecky, Donna M
Hawking, Meredith KD
McNulty, Cliodna AM
author_facet Lecky, Donna M
Hawking, Meredith KD
McNulty, Cliodna AM
author_sort Lecky, Donna M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stool specimen collection is challenging and informal feedback has indicated that participants find the process difficult. Increasing stool specimen returns would improve the investigation of outbreaks of diarrhoeal and food-borne disease. AIM: To explore the barriers to stool sample collection and specimen return to ascertain which factors may help to improve the process. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative patient interview study in Gloucester, UK. METHOD: A two-stage purposive sampling process was used to identify patients who had either previous experience or no experience of collecting a stool sample. The interview schedule, based on the theory of planned behaviour, was used to facilitate interviews with 26 patients. Interview transcripts were analysed using a modified framework analysis. RESULTS: Barriers to collection included embarrassment, fear of results, concerns around hygiene and contamination, discretion and privacy, and lack of information. Personal gain was identified as the main incentive to collecting and returning a stool sample. The need for an information leaflet on stool collection was emphasised by most patients. CONCLUSIONS: GPs could make a number of small changes that could make a big difference for patients and potentially increase stool sample return. If they, rather than receptionists, distributed collection kits it may be easier for patients to ask any questions they had regarding collection. In addition, the provision of a stool-collection information leaflet could increase patients’ confidence regarding collecting the sample, and providing drop-off boxes for specimens could help prevent patients’ embarrassment regarding handing their stool over to a receptionist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4220220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42202202014-11-25 Patients’ perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study Lecky, Donna M Hawking, Meredith KD McNulty, Cliodna AM Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Stool specimen collection is challenging and informal feedback has indicated that participants find the process difficult. Increasing stool specimen returns would improve the investigation of outbreaks of diarrhoeal and food-borne disease. AIM: To explore the barriers to stool sample collection and specimen return to ascertain which factors may help to improve the process. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative patient interview study in Gloucester, UK. METHOD: A two-stage purposive sampling process was used to identify patients who had either previous experience or no experience of collecting a stool sample. The interview schedule, based on the theory of planned behaviour, was used to facilitate interviews with 26 patients. Interview transcripts were analysed using a modified framework analysis. RESULTS: Barriers to collection included embarrassment, fear of results, concerns around hygiene and contamination, discretion and privacy, and lack of information. Personal gain was identified as the main incentive to collecting and returning a stool sample. The need for an information leaflet on stool collection was emphasised by most patients. CONCLUSIONS: GPs could make a number of small changes that could make a big difference for patients and potentially increase stool sample return. If they, rather than receptionists, distributed collection kits it may be easier for patients to ask any questions they had regarding collection. In addition, the provision of a stool-collection information leaflet could increase patients’ confidence regarding collecting the sample, and providing drop-off boxes for specimens could help prevent patients’ embarrassment regarding handing their stool over to a receptionist. Royal College of General Practitioners 2014-11 2014-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4220220/ /pubmed/25348992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682261 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lecky, Donna M
Hawking, Meredith KD
McNulty, Cliodna AM
Patients’ perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study
title Patients’ perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study
title_full Patients’ perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Patients’ perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study
title_short Patients’ perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study
title_sort patients’ perspectives on providing a stool sample to their gp: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25348992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682261
work_keys_str_mv AT leckydonnam patientsperspectivesonprovidingastoolsampletotheirgpaqualitativestudy
AT hawkingmeredithkd patientsperspectivesonprovidingastoolsampletotheirgpaqualitativestudy
AT mcnultycliodnaam patientsperspectivesonprovidingastoolsampletotheirgpaqualitativestudy