Cargando…
Meta-epidemiology
The concept of meta-epidemiology has been introduced with considering the methodological limitations of systematic review for intervention trials. The paradigm of meta-epidemiology has shifted from a statistical method into a new methodology to close gaps between evidence and practice. Main interest...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Epidemiology
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25266419 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014019 |
_version_ | 1782342758233538560 |
---|---|
author | Bae, Jong-Myon |
author_facet | Bae, Jong-Myon |
author_sort | Bae, Jong-Myon |
collection | PubMed |
description | The concept of meta-epidemiology has been introduced with considering the methodological limitations of systematic review for intervention trials. The paradigm of meta-epidemiology has shifted from a statistical method into a new methodology to close gaps between evidence and practice. Main interest of meta-epidemiology is to control potential biases in previous quantitative systematic reviews and draw appropriate evidences for establishing evidence-base guidelines. Nowadays, the network meta-epidemiology was suggested in order to overcome some limitations of meta-epidemiology. To activate meta-epidemiologic studies, implementation of tools for risk of bias and reporting guidelines such as the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) should be done. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4220603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Korean Society of Epidemiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42206032014-11-06 Meta-epidemiology Bae, Jong-Myon Epidemiol Health Methods The concept of meta-epidemiology has been introduced with considering the methodological limitations of systematic review for intervention trials. The paradigm of meta-epidemiology has shifted from a statistical method into a new methodology to close gaps between evidence and practice. Main interest of meta-epidemiology is to control potential biases in previous quantitative systematic reviews and draw appropriate evidences for establishing evidence-base guidelines. Nowadays, the network meta-epidemiology was suggested in order to overcome some limitations of meta-epidemiology. To activate meta-epidemiologic studies, implementation of tools for risk of bias and reporting guidelines such as the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) should be done. Korean Society of Epidemiology 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4220603/ /pubmed/25266419 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014019 Text en ©2014, Korean Society of Epidemiology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Bae, Jong-Myon Meta-epidemiology |
title | Meta-epidemiology |
title_full | Meta-epidemiology |
title_fullStr | Meta-epidemiology |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-epidemiology |
title_short | Meta-epidemiology |
title_sort | meta-epidemiology |
topic | Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25266419 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baejongmyon metaepidemiology |