Cargando…

Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients

This study (PHANTASTIC) compares first-line plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 98 myeloma and lymphoma patients with 151 historic controls mobilised by conventional chemotherapy+G-CSF. Eleven patients developed mild transient symptoms possibly related to plerixafor. No...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, R E, Bell, J, Clark, J O, Braithwaite, B, Vithanarachchi, U, McGinnity, N, Callaghan, T, Francis, S, Salim, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2014.79
_version_ 1782342767566913536
author Clark, R E
Bell, J
Clark, J O
Braithwaite, B
Vithanarachchi, U
McGinnity, N
Callaghan, T
Francis, S
Salim, R
author_facet Clark, R E
Bell, J
Clark, J O
Braithwaite, B
Vithanarachchi, U
McGinnity, N
Callaghan, T
Francis, S
Salim, R
author_sort Clark, R E
collection PubMed
description This study (PHANTASTIC) compares first-line plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 98 myeloma and lymphoma patients with 151 historic controls mobilised by conventional chemotherapy+G-CSF. Eleven patients developed mild transient symptoms possibly related to plerixafor. No serious adverse events were seen. Seventy (71%) plerixafor-mobilised patients achieved both ⩾4 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in ⩽2 aphereses and no neutropenia (<1.0 × 10(9)/l). This is significantly >48 (32%) of 151 historical chemotherapy+G-CSF-mobilised control patients achieving this end point (P<0.001). Ninety-six (98%) plerixafor-mobilised patients achieved ⩾2 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg within one harvest round compared with 114 (75%) of controls (P=0.001). Engraftment times and 12-month outcome were comparable in both groups. Prior treatment was summarised by two scoring systems. Controls mobilising either >2.0 or >4.0 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg have significantly lower scores than mobilisation failures (P=0.002), but this relationship was not seen for plerixafor-mobilised patients. Plerixafor is a more effective and less toxic mobilising agent than conventional chemotherapy (especially in heavily pretreated patients), with comparable subsequent outcome, and merits consideration as the first-line standard of care for stem cell mobilisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4220652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42206522014-11-06 Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients Clark, R E Bell, J Clark, J O Braithwaite, B Vithanarachchi, U McGinnity, N Callaghan, T Francis, S Salim, R Blood Cancer J Original Article This study (PHANTASTIC) compares first-line plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 98 myeloma and lymphoma patients with 151 historic controls mobilised by conventional chemotherapy+G-CSF. Eleven patients developed mild transient symptoms possibly related to plerixafor. No serious adverse events were seen. Seventy (71%) plerixafor-mobilised patients achieved both ⩾4 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in ⩽2 aphereses and no neutropenia (<1.0 × 10(9)/l). This is significantly >48 (32%) of 151 historical chemotherapy+G-CSF-mobilised control patients achieving this end point (P<0.001). Ninety-six (98%) plerixafor-mobilised patients achieved ⩾2 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg within one harvest round compared with 114 (75%) of controls (P=0.001). Engraftment times and 12-month outcome were comparable in both groups. Prior treatment was summarised by two scoring systems. Controls mobilising either >2.0 or >4.0 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg have significantly lower scores than mobilisation failures (P=0.002), but this relationship was not seen for plerixafor-mobilised patients. Plerixafor is a more effective and less toxic mobilising agent than conventional chemotherapy (especially in heavily pretreated patients), with comparable subsequent outcome, and merits consideration as the first-line standard of care for stem cell mobilisation. Nature Publishing Group 2014-10 2014-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4220652/ /pubmed/25360901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2014.79 Text en Copyright © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Clark, R E
Bell, J
Clark, J O
Braithwaite, B
Vithanarachchi, U
McGinnity, N
Callaghan, T
Francis, S
Salim, R
Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients
title Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients
title_full Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients
title_fullStr Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients
title_full_unstemmed Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients
title_short Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients
title_sort plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2014.79
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkre plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients
AT bellj plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients
AT clarkjo plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients
AT braithwaiteb plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients
AT vithanarachchiu plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients
AT mcginnityn plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients
AT callaghant plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients
AT franciss plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients
AT salimr plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients