Cargando…
Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients
This study (PHANTASTIC) compares first-line plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 98 myeloma and lymphoma patients with 151 historic controls mobilised by conventional chemotherapy+G-CSF. Eleven patients developed mild transient symptoms possibly related to plerixafor. No...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2014.79 |
_version_ | 1782342767566913536 |
---|---|
author | Clark, R E Bell, J Clark, J O Braithwaite, B Vithanarachchi, U McGinnity, N Callaghan, T Francis, S Salim, R |
author_facet | Clark, R E Bell, J Clark, J O Braithwaite, B Vithanarachchi, U McGinnity, N Callaghan, T Francis, S Salim, R |
author_sort | Clark, R E |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study (PHANTASTIC) compares first-line plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 98 myeloma and lymphoma patients with 151 historic controls mobilised by conventional chemotherapy+G-CSF. Eleven patients developed mild transient symptoms possibly related to plerixafor. No serious adverse events were seen. Seventy (71%) plerixafor-mobilised patients achieved both ⩾4 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in ⩽2 aphereses and no neutropenia (<1.0 × 10(9)/l). This is significantly >48 (32%) of 151 historical chemotherapy+G-CSF-mobilised control patients achieving this end point (P<0.001). Ninety-six (98%) plerixafor-mobilised patients achieved ⩾2 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg within one harvest round compared with 114 (75%) of controls (P=0.001). Engraftment times and 12-month outcome were comparable in both groups. Prior treatment was summarised by two scoring systems. Controls mobilising either >2.0 or >4.0 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg have significantly lower scores than mobilisation failures (P=0.002), but this relationship was not seen for plerixafor-mobilised patients. Plerixafor is a more effective and less toxic mobilising agent than conventional chemotherapy (especially in heavily pretreated patients), with comparable subsequent outcome, and merits consideration as the first-line standard of care for stem cell mobilisation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4220652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42206522014-11-06 Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients Clark, R E Bell, J Clark, J O Braithwaite, B Vithanarachchi, U McGinnity, N Callaghan, T Francis, S Salim, R Blood Cancer J Original Article This study (PHANTASTIC) compares first-line plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 98 myeloma and lymphoma patients with 151 historic controls mobilised by conventional chemotherapy+G-CSF. Eleven patients developed mild transient symptoms possibly related to plerixafor. No serious adverse events were seen. Seventy (71%) plerixafor-mobilised patients achieved both ⩾4 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in ⩽2 aphereses and no neutropenia (<1.0 × 10(9)/l). This is significantly >48 (32%) of 151 historical chemotherapy+G-CSF-mobilised control patients achieving this end point (P<0.001). Ninety-six (98%) plerixafor-mobilised patients achieved ⩾2 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg within one harvest round compared with 114 (75%) of controls (P=0.001). Engraftment times and 12-month outcome were comparable in both groups. Prior treatment was summarised by two scoring systems. Controls mobilising either >2.0 or >4.0 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg have significantly lower scores than mobilisation failures (P=0.002), but this relationship was not seen for plerixafor-mobilised patients. Plerixafor is a more effective and less toxic mobilising agent than conventional chemotherapy (especially in heavily pretreated patients), with comparable subsequent outcome, and merits consideration as the first-line standard of care for stem cell mobilisation. Nature Publishing Group 2014-10 2014-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4220652/ /pubmed/25360901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2014.79 Text en Copyright © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Clark, R E Bell, J Clark, J O Braithwaite, B Vithanarachchi, U McGinnity, N Callaghan, T Francis, S Salim, R Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients |
title | Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients |
title_full | Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients |
title_fullStr | Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients |
title_short | Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients |
title_sort | plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2014.79 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkre plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients AT bellj plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients AT clarkjo plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients AT braithwaiteb plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients AT vithanarachchiu plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients AT mcginnityn plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients AT callaghant plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients AT franciss plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients AT salimr plerixaforissuperiortoconventionalchemotherapyforfirstlinestemcellmobilisationandiseffectiveeveninheavilypretreatedpatients |