Cargando…

What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs

BACKGROUND: Global health institutions increasingly recognize that the right to health should guide the formulation of replacement goals for the Millennium Development Goals, which expire in 2015. However, the right to health’s contribution is undercut by the principle of progressive realization, wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forman, Lisa, Ooms, Gorik, Chapman, Audrey, Friedman, Eric, Waris, Attiya, Lamprea, Everaldo, Mulumba, Moses
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-13-48
_version_ 1782342771777994752
author Forman, Lisa
Ooms, Gorik
Chapman, Audrey
Friedman, Eric
Waris, Attiya
Lamprea, Everaldo
Mulumba, Moses
author_facet Forman, Lisa
Ooms, Gorik
Chapman, Audrey
Friedman, Eric
Waris, Attiya
Lamprea, Everaldo
Mulumba, Moses
author_sort Forman, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Global health institutions increasingly recognize that the right to health should guide the formulation of replacement goals for the Millennium Development Goals, which expire in 2015. However, the right to health’s contribution is undercut by the principle of progressive realization, which links provision of health services to available resources, permitting states to deny even basic levels of health coverage domestically and allowing international assistance for health to remain entirely discretionary. DISCUSSION: To prevent progressive realization from undermining both domestic and international responsibilities towards health, international human rights law institutions developed the idea of non-derogable “minimum core” obligations to provide essential health services. While minimum core obligations have enjoyed some uptake in human rights practice and scholarship, their definition in international law fails to specify which health services should fall within their scope, or to specify wealthy country obligations to assist poorer countries. These definitional gaps undercut the capacity of minimum core obligations to protect essential health needs against inaction, austerity and illegitimate trade-offs in both domestic and global action. If the right to health is to effectively advance essential global health needs in these contexts, weaknesses within the minimum core concept must be resolved through innovative research on social, political and legal conceptualizations of essential health needs. SUMMARY: We believe that if the minimum core concept is strengthened in these ways, it will produce a more feasible and grounded conception of legally prioritized health needs that could assist in advancing health equity, including by providing a framework rooted in legal obligations to guide the formulation of new health development goals, providing a baseline of essential health services to be protected as a matter of right against governmental claims of scarcity and inadequate international assistance, and empowering civil society to claim fulfillment of their essential health needs from domestic and global decision-makers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4220671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42206712014-11-06 What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs Forman, Lisa Ooms, Gorik Chapman, Audrey Friedman, Eric Waris, Attiya Lamprea, Everaldo Mulumba, Moses BMC Int Health Hum Rights Debate BACKGROUND: Global health institutions increasingly recognize that the right to health should guide the formulation of replacement goals for the Millennium Development Goals, which expire in 2015. However, the right to health’s contribution is undercut by the principle of progressive realization, which links provision of health services to available resources, permitting states to deny even basic levels of health coverage domestically and allowing international assistance for health to remain entirely discretionary. DISCUSSION: To prevent progressive realization from undermining both domestic and international responsibilities towards health, international human rights law institutions developed the idea of non-derogable “minimum core” obligations to provide essential health services. While minimum core obligations have enjoyed some uptake in human rights practice and scholarship, their definition in international law fails to specify which health services should fall within their scope, or to specify wealthy country obligations to assist poorer countries. These definitional gaps undercut the capacity of minimum core obligations to protect essential health needs against inaction, austerity and illegitimate trade-offs in both domestic and global action. If the right to health is to effectively advance essential global health needs in these contexts, weaknesses within the minimum core concept must be resolved through innovative research on social, political and legal conceptualizations of essential health needs. SUMMARY: We believe that if the minimum core concept is strengthened in these ways, it will produce a more feasible and grounded conception of legally prioritized health needs that could assist in advancing health equity, including by providing a framework rooted in legal obligations to guide the formulation of new health development goals, providing a baseline of essential health services to be protected as a matter of right against governmental claims of scarcity and inadequate international assistance, and empowering civil society to claim fulfillment of their essential health needs from domestic and global decision-makers. BioMed Central 2013-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4220671/ /pubmed/24289096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-13-48 Text en Copyright © 2013 Forman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Forman, Lisa
Ooms, Gorik
Chapman, Audrey
Friedman, Eric
Waris, Attiya
Lamprea, Everaldo
Mulumba, Moses
What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
title What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
title_full What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
title_fullStr What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
title_full_unstemmed What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
title_short What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
title_sort what could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-13-48
work_keys_str_mv AT formanlisa whatcouldastrengthenedrighttohealthbringtothepost2015healthdevelopmentagendainterrogatingtheroleoftheminimumcoreconceptinadvancingessentialglobalhealthneeds
AT oomsgorik whatcouldastrengthenedrighttohealthbringtothepost2015healthdevelopmentagendainterrogatingtheroleoftheminimumcoreconceptinadvancingessentialglobalhealthneeds
AT chapmanaudrey whatcouldastrengthenedrighttohealthbringtothepost2015healthdevelopmentagendainterrogatingtheroleoftheminimumcoreconceptinadvancingessentialglobalhealthneeds
AT friedmaneric whatcouldastrengthenedrighttohealthbringtothepost2015healthdevelopmentagendainterrogatingtheroleoftheminimumcoreconceptinadvancingessentialglobalhealthneeds
AT warisattiya whatcouldastrengthenedrighttohealthbringtothepost2015healthdevelopmentagendainterrogatingtheroleoftheminimumcoreconceptinadvancingessentialglobalhealthneeds
AT lampreaeveraldo whatcouldastrengthenedrighttohealthbringtothepost2015healthdevelopmentagendainterrogatingtheroleoftheminimumcoreconceptinadvancingessentialglobalhealthneeds
AT mulumbamoses whatcouldastrengthenedrighttohealthbringtothepost2015healthdevelopmentagendainterrogatingtheroleoftheminimumcoreconceptinadvancingessentialglobalhealthneeds