Cargando…
Development and Evaluation of ‘Briefing Notes’ as a Novel Knowledge Translation Tool to Aid the Implementation of Sex/Gender Analysis in Systematic Reviews: A Pilot Study
BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of sex/gender differences in health and the importance of identifying differential effects of interventions for men and women. Yet, to whom the research evidence does or does not apply, with regard to sex/gender, is often insufficiently answered. This is a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25372876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110786 |
_version_ | 1782342815291801600 |
---|---|
author | Doull, Marion Welch, Vivian Puil, Lorri Runnels, Vivien Coen, Stephanie E. Shea, Beverley O’Neill, Jennifer Borkhoff, Cornelia Tudiver, Sari Boscoe, Madeline |
author_facet | Doull, Marion Welch, Vivian Puil, Lorri Runnels, Vivien Coen, Stephanie E. Shea, Beverley O’Neill, Jennifer Borkhoff, Cornelia Tudiver, Sari Boscoe, Madeline |
author_sort | Doull, Marion |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of sex/gender differences in health and the importance of identifying differential effects of interventions for men and women. Yet, to whom the research evidence does or does not apply, with regard to sex/gender, is often insufficiently answered. This is also true for systematic reviews which synthesize results of primary studies. A lack of analysis and reporting of evidence on sex/gender raises concerns about the applicability of systematic reviews. To bridge this gap, this pilot study aimed to translate knowledge about sex/gender analysis (SGA) into a user-friendly ‘briefing note’ format and evaluate its potential in aiding the implementation of SGA in systematic reviews. METHODS: Our Sex/Gender Methods Group used an interactive process to translate knowledge about sex/gender into briefing notes, a concise communication tool used by policy and decision makers. The briefing notes were developed in collaboration with three Cochrane Collaboration review groups (HIV/AIDS, Hypertension, and Musculoskeletal) who were also the target knowledge users of the briefing notes. Briefing note development was informed by existing systematic review checklists, literature on sex/gender, in-person and virtual meetings, and consultation with topic experts. Finally, we held a workshop for potential users to evaluate the notes. RESULTS: Each briefing note provides tailored guidance on considering sex/gender to reviewers who are planning or conducting systematic reviews and includes the rationale for considering sex/gender, with examples specific to each review group’s focus. Review authors found that the briefing notes provided welcome guidance on implementing SGA that was clear and concise, but also identified conceptual and implementation challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Sex/gender briefing notes are a promising knowledge translation tool. By encouraging sex/gender analysis and equity considerations in systematic reviews, the briefing notes can assist systematic reviewers in ensuring the applicability of research evidence, with the goal of improved health outcomes for diverse populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4220945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42209452014-11-12 Development and Evaluation of ‘Briefing Notes’ as a Novel Knowledge Translation Tool to Aid the Implementation of Sex/Gender Analysis in Systematic Reviews: A Pilot Study Doull, Marion Welch, Vivian Puil, Lorri Runnels, Vivien Coen, Stephanie E. Shea, Beverley O’Neill, Jennifer Borkhoff, Cornelia Tudiver, Sari Boscoe, Madeline PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of sex/gender differences in health and the importance of identifying differential effects of interventions for men and women. Yet, to whom the research evidence does or does not apply, with regard to sex/gender, is often insufficiently answered. This is also true for systematic reviews which synthesize results of primary studies. A lack of analysis and reporting of evidence on sex/gender raises concerns about the applicability of systematic reviews. To bridge this gap, this pilot study aimed to translate knowledge about sex/gender analysis (SGA) into a user-friendly ‘briefing note’ format and evaluate its potential in aiding the implementation of SGA in systematic reviews. METHODS: Our Sex/Gender Methods Group used an interactive process to translate knowledge about sex/gender into briefing notes, a concise communication tool used by policy and decision makers. The briefing notes were developed in collaboration with three Cochrane Collaboration review groups (HIV/AIDS, Hypertension, and Musculoskeletal) who were also the target knowledge users of the briefing notes. Briefing note development was informed by existing systematic review checklists, literature on sex/gender, in-person and virtual meetings, and consultation with topic experts. Finally, we held a workshop for potential users to evaluate the notes. RESULTS: Each briefing note provides tailored guidance on considering sex/gender to reviewers who are planning or conducting systematic reviews and includes the rationale for considering sex/gender, with examples specific to each review group’s focus. Review authors found that the briefing notes provided welcome guidance on implementing SGA that was clear and concise, but also identified conceptual and implementation challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Sex/gender briefing notes are a promising knowledge translation tool. By encouraging sex/gender analysis and equity considerations in systematic reviews, the briefing notes can assist systematic reviewers in ensuring the applicability of research evidence, with the goal of improved health outcomes for diverse populations. Public Library of Science 2014-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4220945/ /pubmed/25372876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110786 Text en © 2014 Doull et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Doull, Marion Welch, Vivian Puil, Lorri Runnels, Vivien Coen, Stephanie E. Shea, Beverley O’Neill, Jennifer Borkhoff, Cornelia Tudiver, Sari Boscoe, Madeline Development and Evaluation of ‘Briefing Notes’ as a Novel Knowledge Translation Tool to Aid the Implementation of Sex/Gender Analysis in Systematic Reviews: A Pilot Study |
title | Development and Evaluation of ‘Briefing Notes’ as a Novel Knowledge Translation Tool to Aid the Implementation of Sex/Gender Analysis in Systematic Reviews: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Development and Evaluation of ‘Briefing Notes’ as a Novel Knowledge Translation Tool to Aid the Implementation of Sex/Gender Analysis in Systematic Reviews: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Development and Evaluation of ‘Briefing Notes’ as a Novel Knowledge Translation Tool to Aid the Implementation of Sex/Gender Analysis in Systematic Reviews: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Evaluation of ‘Briefing Notes’ as a Novel Knowledge Translation Tool to Aid the Implementation of Sex/Gender Analysis in Systematic Reviews: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Development and Evaluation of ‘Briefing Notes’ as a Novel Knowledge Translation Tool to Aid the Implementation of Sex/Gender Analysis in Systematic Reviews: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | development and evaluation of ‘briefing notes’ as a novel knowledge translation tool to aid the implementation of sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews: a pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25372876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doullmarion developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy AT welchvivian developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy AT puillorri developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy AT runnelsvivien developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy AT coenstephaniee developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy AT sheabeverley developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy AT oneilljennifer developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy AT borkhoffcornelia developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy AT tudiversari developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy AT boscoemadeline developmentandevaluationofbriefingnotesasanovelknowledgetranslationtooltoaidtheimplementationofsexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewsapilotstudy |