Cargando…
Global Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Indigenous Health Interventions
BACKGROUND: Indigenous populations around the world have consistently been shown to bear a greater burden of disease, death and disability than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Despite this, little is known about what constitutes cost-effective interventions in these groups. The objective of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25372606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111249 |
_version_ | 1782342827731058688 |
---|---|
author | Angell, Blake J. Muhunthan, Janani Irving, Michelle Eades, Sandra Jan, Stephen |
author_facet | Angell, Blake J. Muhunthan, Janani Irving, Michelle Eades, Sandra Jan, Stephen |
author_sort | Angell, Blake J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Indigenous populations around the world have consistently been shown to bear a greater burden of disease, death and disability than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Despite this, little is known about what constitutes cost-effective interventions in these groups. The objective of this paper was to assess the global cost-effectiveness literature in Indigenous health to identify characteristics of successful and unsuccessful interventions and highlight areas for further research. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A systematic review of the published literature was carried out. MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, ECONLIT, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched with terms to identify cost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions in Indigenous populations around the world. The WHO definition was followed in identifying Indigenous populations. 19 studies reporting on 27 interventions were included in the review. The majority of studies came from high-income nations with only two studies of interventions in low and middle-income nations. 22 of the 27 interventions included in the analysis were found to be cost-effective or cost-saving by the respective studies. There were only two studies that focused on Indigenous communities in urban areas, neither of which was found to be cost-effective. There was little attention paid to Indigenous conceptions of health in included studies. Of the 27 included studies, 23 were interventions that specifically targeted Indigenous populations. Outreach programs were shown to be consistently cost-effective. CONCLUSION: The comprehensive review found only a small number of studies examining the cost-effectiveness of interventions into Indigenous communities around the world. Given the persistent disparities in health outcomes faced by these populations and commitments from governments around the world to improving these outcomes, it is an area where the health economics and public health fields can play an important role in improving the health of millions of people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4221002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42210022014-11-12 Global Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Indigenous Health Interventions Angell, Blake J. Muhunthan, Janani Irving, Michelle Eades, Sandra Jan, Stephen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Indigenous populations around the world have consistently been shown to bear a greater burden of disease, death and disability than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Despite this, little is known about what constitutes cost-effective interventions in these groups. The objective of this paper was to assess the global cost-effectiveness literature in Indigenous health to identify characteristics of successful and unsuccessful interventions and highlight areas for further research. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A systematic review of the published literature was carried out. MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, ECONLIT, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched with terms to identify cost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions in Indigenous populations around the world. The WHO definition was followed in identifying Indigenous populations. 19 studies reporting on 27 interventions were included in the review. The majority of studies came from high-income nations with only two studies of interventions in low and middle-income nations. 22 of the 27 interventions included in the analysis were found to be cost-effective or cost-saving by the respective studies. There were only two studies that focused on Indigenous communities in urban areas, neither of which was found to be cost-effective. There was little attention paid to Indigenous conceptions of health in included studies. Of the 27 included studies, 23 were interventions that specifically targeted Indigenous populations. Outreach programs were shown to be consistently cost-effective. CONCLUSION: The comprehensive review found only a small number of studies examining the cost-effectiveness of interventions into Indigenous communities around the world. Given the persistent disparities in health outcomes faced by these populations and commitments from governments around the world to improving these outcomes, it is an area where the health economics and public health fields can play an important role in improving the health of millions of people. Public Library of Science 2014-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4221002/ /pubmed/25372606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111249 Text en © 2014 Angell et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Angell, Blake J. Muhunthan, Janani Irving, Michelle Eades, Sandra Jan, Stephen Global Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Indigenous Health Interventions |
title | Global Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Indigenous Health Interventions |
title_full | Global Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Indigenous Health Interventions |
title_fullStr | Global Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Indigenous Health Interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Global Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Indigenous Health Interventions |
title_short | Global Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Indigenous Health Interventions |
title_sort | global systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of indigenous health interventions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25372606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angellblakej globalsystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofindigenoushealthinterventions AT muhunthanjanani globalsystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofindigenoushealthinterventions AT irvingmichelle globalsystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofindigenoushealthinterventions AT eadessandra globalsystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofindigenoushealthinterventions AT janstephen globalsystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofindigenoushealthinterventions |