Cargando…
Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
OBJECTIVE: To compare the low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with high frequency (20 Hz) rTMS on motor functional improvement of the affected upper extremity in subacute stroke patients. METHODS: Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke participated in this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379487 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.585 |
_version_ | 1782342874328727552 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun Jung, Heejin Lee, Byeong-Ju Lee, Ki Hoon Lim, Young-Joon |
author_facet | Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun Jung, Heejin Lee, Byeong-Ju Lee, Ki Hoon Lim, Young-Joon |
author_sort | Kim, Chul |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with high frequency (20 Hz) rTMS on motor functional improvement of the affected upper extremity in subacute stroke patients. METHODS: Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke participated in this study. The first group received 10 sessions of 20 Hz rTMS at ipsilesional M1 area and the other group received 10 sessions of 1 Hz rTMS at contralesional M1 area. Motor training of the hemiparetic hand was conducted after each rTMS train. All the patients received conventional occupational therapy immediately after each rTMS session. Manual function test (MFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (FMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Brunnstrom recovery stage, and grip strength were used to assess motor function before, at the end of, and one month after the last session of rTMS. RESULTS: No adverse side effects were reported during the course of the experiment using rTMS. No significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity was observed between the two groups before rTMS. Significant improvements in MFT, FMS, MBI, and Brunnstrom stage were observed in the both groups at the end of the last rTMS session and one month later (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity between 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS during the subacute period of ischemic stroke. Thus, we cannot conclude which has a greater effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4221386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42213862014-11-06 Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun Jung, Heejin Lee, Byeong-Ju Lee, Ki Hoon Lim, Young-Joon Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with high frequency (20 Hz) rTMS on motor functional improvement of the affected upper extremity in subacute stroke patients. METHODS: Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke participated in this study. The first group received 10 sessions of 20 Hz rTMS at ipsilesional M1 area and the other group received 10 sessions of 1 Hz rTMS at contralesional M1 area. Motor training of the hemiparetic hand was conducted after each rTMS train. All the patients received conventional occupational therapy immediately after each rTMS session. Manual function test (MFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (FMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Brunnstrom recovery stage, and grip strength were used to assess motor function before, at the end of, and one month after the last session of rTMS. RESULTS: No adverse side effects were reported during the course of the experiment using rTMS. No significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity was observed between the two groups before rTMS. Significant improvements in MFT, FMS, MBI, and Brunnstrom stage were observed in the both groups at the end of the last rTMS session and one month later (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity between 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS during the subacute period of ischemic stroke. Thus, we cannot conclude which has a greater effect. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2014-10 2014-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4221386/ /pubmed/25379487 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.585 Text en Copyright © 2014 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun Jung, Heejin Lee, Byeong-Ju Lee, Ki Hoon Lim, Young-Joon Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients |
title | Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients |
title_full | Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients |
title_short | Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients |
title_sort | comparison of the effects of 1 hz and 20 hz rtms on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379487 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.585 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimchul comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients AT choiheeeun comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients AT jungheejin comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients AT leebyeongju comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients AT leekihoon comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients AT limyoungjoon comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients |