Cargando…

Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients

OBJECTIVE: To compare the low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with high frequency (20 Hz) rTMS on motor functional improvement of the affected upper extremity in subacute stroke patients. METHODS: Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke participated in this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Chul, Choi, Hee Eun, Jung, Heejin, Lee, Byeong-Ju, Lee, Ki Hoon, Lim, Young-Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379487
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.585
_version_ 1782342874328727552
author Kim, Chul
Choi, Hee Eun
Jung, Heejin
Lee, Byeong-Ju
Lee, Ki Hoon
Lim, Young-Joon
author_facet Kim, Chul
Choi, Hee Eun
Jung, Heejin
Lee, Byeong-Ju
Lee, Ki Hoon
Lim, Young-Joon
author_sort Kim, Chul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with high frequency (20 Hz) rTMS on motor functional improvement of the affected upper extremity in subacute stroke patients. METHODS: Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke participated in this study. The first group received 10 sessions of 20 Hz rTMS at ipsilesional M1 area and the other group received 10 sessions of 1 Hz rTMS at contralesional M1 area. Motor training of the hemiparetic hand was conducted after each rTMS train. All the patients received conventional occupational therapy immediately after each rTMS session. Manual function test (MFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (FMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Brunnstrom recovery stage, and grip strength were used to assess motor function before, at the end of, and one month after the last session of rTMS. RESULTS: No adverse side effects were reported during the course of the experiment using rTMS. No significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity was observed between the two groups before rTMS. Significant improvements in MFT, FMS, MBI, and Brunnstrom stage were observed in the both groups at the end of the last rTMS session and one month later (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity between 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS during the subacute period of ischemic stroke. Thus, we cannot conclude which has a greater effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4221386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42213862014-11-06 Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun Jung, Heejin Lee, Byeong-Ju Lee, Ki Hoon Lim, Young-Joon Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with high frequency (20 Hz) rTMS on motor functional improvement of the affected upper extremity in subacute stroke patients. METHODS: Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke participated in this study. The first group received 10 sessions of 20 Hz rTMS at ipsilesional M1 area and the other group received 10 sessions of 1 Hz rTMS at contralesional M1 area. Motor training of the hemiparetic hand was conducted after each rTMS train. All the patients received conventional occupational therapy immediately after each rTMS session. Manual function test (MFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (FMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Brunnstrom recovery stage, and grip strength were used to assess motor function before, at the end of, and one month after the last session of rTMS. RESULTS: No adverse side effects were reported during the course of the experiment using rTMS. No significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity was observed between the two groups before rTMS. Significant improvements in MFT, FMS, MBI, and Brunnstrom stage were observed in the both groups at the end of the last rTMS session and one month later (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity between 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS during the subacute period of ischemic stroke. Thus, we cannot conclude which has a greater effect. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2014-10 2014-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4221386/ /pubmed/25379487 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.585 Text en Copyright © 2014 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Chul
Choi, Hee Eun
Jung, Heejin
Lee, Byeong-Ju
Lee, Ki Hoon
Lim, Young-Joon
Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
title Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_full Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_short Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_sort comparison of the effects of 1 hz and 20 hz rtms on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379487
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.585
work_keys_str_mv AT kimchul comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients
AT choiheeeun comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients
AT jungheejin comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients
AT leebyeongju comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients
AT leekihoon comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients
AT limyoungjoon comparisonoftheeffectsof1hzand20hzrtmsonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestrokepatients