Cargando…

Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length

BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) is one of the most important steps in assisted re- productive technology (ART) cycles and affected by many factors namely the depth of embryo deposition in uterus. In this study, the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injec- tion (ICSI) cycles after blind embryo tran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saharkhiz, Nasrin, Nikbakht, Roshan, Salehpour, Saghar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royan Institute 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379152
_version_ 1782342888441511936
author Saharkhiz, Nasrin
Nikbakht, Roshan
Salehpour, Saghar
author_facet Saharkhiz, Nasrin
Nikbakht, Roshan
Salehpour, Saghar
author_sort Saharkhiz, Nasrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) is one of the most important steps in assisted re- productive technology (ART) cycles and affected by many factors namely the depth of embryo deposition in uterus. In this study, the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injec- tion (ICSI) cycles after blind embryo transfer and embryo transfer based on previously measured uterine length using vaginal ultrasound were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomised clinical trial included one hun- dred and forty non-donor fresh embryo transfers during January 2010 to June 2011. In group I, ET was performed using conventional (blind) method at 5-6cm from the external os, and in group II, ET was done at a depth of 1-1.5 cm from the uterine fundus based on previously measured uterine length using vaginal sonography. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. The software that we used was PASW statistics version 18. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Chemical pregnancy rate was 28.7% in group I and 42.1% in group II, while the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.105). Clinical pregnancy, ongoing preg- nancy and implantation rates for group I were 21.2%, 17.7%, and 12.8%, while for group II were 33.9%, 33.9%, and 22.1, respectively. In group I and group II, abortion rates were 34.7% and 0%, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (p<0.005). No ectopic pregnancy occurred in two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of uterine length measurement during treatment cycle in order to place embryos at depth of 1-1.5cm from fundus significantly increases clinical and ongo- ing pregnancy and implantation rates, while leads to a decrease in abortion rate (Registra- tion Number: IRCT2014032512494N1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4221510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Royan Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42215102014-11-06 Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length Saharkhiz, Nasrin Nikbakht, Roshan Salehpour, Saghar Int J Fertil Steril Original Article BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) is one of the most important steps in assisted re- productive technology (ART) cycles and affected by many factors namely the depth of embryo deposition in uterus. In this study, the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injec- tion (ICSI) cycles after blind embryo transfer and embryo transfer based on previously measured uterine length using vaginal ultrasound were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomised clinical trial included one hun- dred and forty non-donor fresh embryo transfers during January 2010 to June 2011. In group I, ET was performed using conventional (blind) method at 5-6cm from the external os, and in group II, ET was done at a depth of 1-1.5 cm from the uterine fundus based on previously measured uterine length using vaginal sonography. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. The software that we used was PASW statistics version 18. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Chemical pregnancy rate was 28.7% in group I and 42.1% in group II, while the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.105). Clinical pregnancy, ongoing preg- nancy and implantation rates for group I were 21.2%, 17.7%, and 12.8%, while for group II were 33.9%, 33.9%, and 22.1, respectively. In group I and group II, abortion rates were 34.7% and 0%, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (p<0.005). No ectopic pregnancy occurred in two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of uterine length measurement during treatment cycle in order to place embryos at depth of 1-1.5cm from fundus significantly increases clinical and ongo- ing pregnancy and implantation rates, while leads to a decrease in abortion rate (Registra- tion Number: IRCT2014032512494N1). Royan Institute 2014 2014-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4221510/ /pubmed/25379152 Text en Any use, distribution, reproduction or abstract of this publication in any medium, with the exception of commercial purposes, is permitted provided the original work is properly cited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saharkhiz, Nasrin
Nikbakht, Roshan
Salehpour, Saghar
Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length
title Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length
title_full Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length
title_fullStr Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length
title_short Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length
title_sort comparison between conventional blind embryo transfer and embryo transfer based on previously measured uterine length
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379152
work_keys_str_mv AT saharkhiznasrin comparisonbetweenconventionalblindembryotransferandembryotransferbasedonpreviouslymeasureduterinelength
AT nikbakhtroshan comparisonbetweenconventionalblindembryotransferandembryotransferbasedonpreviouslymeasureduterinelength
AT salehpoursaghar comparisonbetweenconventionalblindembryotransferandembryotransferbasedonpreviouslymeasureduterinelength