Cargando…
Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length
BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) is one of the most important steps in assisted re- productive technology (ART) cycles and affected by many factors namely the depth of embryo deposition in uterus. In this study, the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injec- tion (ICSI) cycles after blind embryo tran...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royan Institute
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379152 |
_version_ | 1782342888441511936 |
---|---|
author | Saharkhiz, Nasrin Nikbakht, Roshan Salehpour, Saghar |
author_facet | Saharkhiz, Nasrin Nikbakht, Roshan Salehpour, Saghar |
author_sort | Saharkhiz, Nasrin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) is one of the most important steps in assisted re- productive technology (ART) cycles and affected by many factors namely the depth of embryo deposition in uterus. In this study, the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injec- tion (ICSI) cycles after blind embryo transfer and embryo transfer based on previously measured uterine length using vaginal ultrasound were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomised clinical trial included one hun- dred and forty non-donor fresh embryo transfers during January 2010 to June 2011. In group I, ET was performed using conventional (blind) method at 5-6cm from the external os, and in group II, ET was done at a depth of 1-1.5 cm from the uterine fundus based on previously measured uterine length using vaginal sonography. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. The software that we used was PASW statistics version 18. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Chemical pregnancy rate was 28.7% in group I and 42.1% in group II, while the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.105). Clinical pregnancy, ongoing preg- nancy and implantation rates for group I were 21.2%, 17.7%, and 12.8%, while for group II were 33.9%, 33.9%, and 22.1, respectively. In group I and group II, abortion rates were 34.7% and 0%, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (p<0.005). No ectopic pregnancy occurred in two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of uterine length measurement during treatment cycle in order to place embryos at depth of 1-1.5cm from fundus significantly increases clinical and ongo- ing pregnancy and implantation rates, while leads to a decrease in abortion rate (Registra- tion Number: IRCT2014032512494N1). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4221510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Royan Institute |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42215102014-11-06 Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length Saharkhiz, Nasrin Nikbakht, Roshan Salehpour, Saghar Int J Fertil Steril Original Article BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) is one of the most important steps in assisted re- productive technology (ART) cycles and affected by many factors namely the depth of embryo deposition in uterus. In this study, the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injec- tion (ICSI) cycles after blind embryo transfer and embryo transfer based on previously measured uterine length using vaginal ultrasound were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomised clinical trial included one hun- dred and forty non-donor fresh embryo transfers during January 2010 to June 2011. In group I, ET was performed using conventional (blind) method at 5-6cm from the external os, and in group II, ET was done at a depth of 1-1.5 cm from the uterine fundus based on previously measured uterine length using vaginal sonography. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. The software that we used was PASW statistics version 18. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Chemical pregnancy rate was 28.7% in group I and 42.1% in group II, while the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.105). Clinical pregnancy, ongoing preg- nancy and implantation rates for group I were 21.2%, 17.7%, and 12.8%, while for group II were 33.9%, 33.9%, and 22.1, respectively. In group I and group II, abortion rates were 34.7% and 0%, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (p<0.005). No ectopic pregnancy occurred in two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of uterine length measurement during treatment cycle in order to place embryos at depth of 1-1.5cm from fundus significantly increases clinical and ongo- ing pregnancy and implantation rates, while leads to a decrease in abortion rate (Registra- tion Number: IRCT2014032512494N1). Royan Institute 2014 2014-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4221510/ /pubmed/25379152 Text en Any use, distribution, reproduction or abstract of this publication in any medium, with the exception of commercial purposes, is permitted provided the original work is properly cited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Saharkhiz, Nasrin Nikbakht, Roshan Salehpour, Saghar Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length |
title | Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo
Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on
Previously Measured Uterine Length |
title_full | Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo
Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on
Previously Measured Uterine Length |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo
Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on
Previously Measured Uterine Length |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo
Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on
Previously Measured Uterine Length |
title_short | Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo
Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on
Previously Measured Uterine Length |
title_sort | comparison between conventional blind embryo
transfer and embryo transfer based on
previously measured uterine length |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379152 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saharkhiznasrin comparisonbetweenconventionalblindembryotransferandembryotransferbasedonpreviouslymeasureduterinelength AT nikbakhtroshan comparisonbetweenconventionalblindembryotransferandembryotransferbasedonpreviouslymeasureduterinelength AT salehpoursaghar comparisonbetweenconventionalblindembryotransferandembryotransferbasedonpreviouslymeasureduterinelength |