Cargando…

Contribution of dynamic sentinel lymphoscintigraphy images to the diagnosis of patients with malignant skin neoplasms in the upper and lower extremities

The aim of the present study was to confirm the contribution of dynamic images in sentinel lymphoscintigraphy in malignant skin neoplasms: precisely, to investigate if dynamic images were necessary and to observe if dynamic images could reduce the areas needed for biopsy and dissection. Twenty-five...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miura, Hiroyuki, Ono, Shuichi, Shibutani, Koichi, Seino, Hiroko, Tsushima, Fumiyasu, Kakehata, Shinya, Hirose, Katsumi, Fujita, Hiromasa, Kakuta, Akihisa, Aoki, Masahiko, Hatayma, Yoshiomi, Kawaguchi, Hideo, Sato, Mariko, Takai, Yoshihiro, Kaneko, Takahide, Sawamura, Daisuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25392795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-625
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of the present study was to confirm the contribution of dynamic images in sentinel lymphoscintigraphy in malignant skin neoplasms: precisely, to investigate if dynamic images were necessary and to observe if dynamic images could reduce the areas needed for biopsy and dissection. Twenty-five patients with malignant skin neoplasms of the lower (n = 21) and upper (n = 4) extremities were retrospectively investigated. Images were evaluated by two independent reviewers, an expert in diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine and a diagnostic radiologist in training. Visualized hot spots were assessed to be sentinel nodes using only static planar images. Next, both static planar and dynamic images were assessed. Reviewers scored diagnostic confidence values of determined sentinel nodes as follows: 0, cannot be decided; 1, possible; 2, probable; and 3, definitive. Patterns of lymphatic drainage were categorized into six different pathways: (1) inguinal type, (2) popliteal type, (3) inguinal and popliteal type, (4) axillary type, (5) cubital type, and (6) axillary and cubital type. In cases in the lower extremities, with dynamic images, the expert reviewer changed assessment in three cases and the trainee reviewer changed it in one case. There were no cases in which a decision was changed to be the same between both reviewers. Although the average diagnostic confidence value of assessment is usually higher with dynamic images, significant differences were not present. In cases of the upper extremities, both reviewers changed their assessment in one patient. By mutual agreement, cases in which assessment was changed with dynamic images were the inguinal and popliteal type, and the axillary and cubital type. The expert reviewer noticed lymphatic channels only visualized on dynamic images and changed assessment. Determination of whether or not a lymph node is a sentinel node depends on visualization of the lymphatic network. In the present circumstances, all biopsies of hot spots determined to be lymph nodes should not be excluded. However, excessive biopsies should be avoided as much as possible. It is necessary to use dynamic images alongside skillful observation.