Cargando…
Patient reported experiences of CT guided lung biopsy: a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: CT guided lung biopsy is a commonly performed procedure to obtain tissue for a histological diagnosis in cases of suspected lung cancer. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study to obtain information directly from patients about their experiences of the biopsy procedure, thus obtainin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-53 |
_version_ | 1782342912016646144 |
---|---|
author | Winn, Naomi Spratt, Jonathan Wright, Enid Cox, Julie |
author_facet | Winn, Naomi Spratt, Jonathan Wright, Enid Cox, Julie |
author_sort | Winn, Naomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CT guided lung biopsy is a commonly performed procedure to obtain tissue for a histological diagnosis in cases of suspected lung cancer. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study to obtain information directly from patients about their experiences of the biopsy procedure, thus obtaining a more accurate picture of complications compared with previously performed retrospective reviews. Patients participated in a post-procedure telephone interview and information was gathered about any procedural complications and personal experiences. We also compared the patient reported complications with those obtained from a retrospective review of hospital databases, analogous to previously performed retrospective studies. RESULTS: In our patient group, reported procedural complication rates were 10% pneumothorax rate (4% requiring a chest drain) and 10% haemoptysis. Post-procedural pain and shortness of breath showed positive correlation, with one patient experiencing prolonged pain. No statistical difference was found between the patient reported complication rates and those obtained from retrospective review of the hospital database. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates CT guided lung biopsy is a safe procedure and is generally well tolerated. Some patients may experience significant and lasting pain and therefore should be counselled about this pre-procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4221673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42216732014-11-07 Patient reported experiences of CT guided lung biopsy: a prospective cohort study Winn, Naomi Spratt, Jonathan Wright, Enid Cox, Julie Multidiscip Respir Med Original Research Article BACKGROUND: CT guided lung biopsy is a commonly performed procedure to obtain tissue for a histological diagnosis in cases of suspected lung cancer. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study to obtain information directly from patients about their experiences of the biopsy procedure, thus obtaining a more accurate picture of complications compared with previously performed retrospective reviews. Patients participated in a post-procedure telephone interview and information was gathered about any procedural complications and personal experiences. We also compared the patient reported complications with those obtained from a retrospective review of hospital databases, analogous to previously performed retrospective studies. RESULTS: In our patient group, reported procedural complication rates were 10% pneumothorax rate (4% requiring a chest drain) and 10% haemoptysis. Post-procedural pain and shortness of breath showed positive correlation, with one patient experiencing prolonged pain. No statistical difference was found between the patient reported complication rates and those obtained from retrospective review of the hospital database. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates CT guided lung biopsy is a safe procedure and is generally well tolerated. Some patients may experience significant and lasting pain and therefore should be counselled about this pre-procedure. BioMed Central 2014-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4221673/ /pubmed/25379180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-53 Text en © Winn et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Winn, Naomi Spratt, Jonathan Wright, Enid Cox, Julie Patient reported experiences of CT guided lung biopsy: a prospective cohort study |
title | Patient reported experiences of CT guided lung biopsy: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Patient reported experiences of CT guided lung biopsy: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Patient reported experiences of CT guided lung biopsy: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient reported experiences of CT guided lung biopsy: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Patient reported experiences of CT guided lung biopsy: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | patient reported experiences of ct guided lung biopsy: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-53 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winnnaomi patientreportedexperiencesofctguidedlungbiopsyaprospectivecohortstudy AT sprattjonathan patientreportedexperiencesofctguidedlungbiopsyaprospectivecohortstudy AT wrightenid patientreportedexperiencesofctguidedlungbiopsyaprospectivecohortstudy AT coxjulie patientreportedexperiencesofctguidedlungbiopsyaprospectivecohortstudy |