Cargando…

Influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants: comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches

In ruminant nutrition, peas are characterized by high protein solubility and degradability, which impair its protein value estimated by the official in situ method. Grinding can be used as a technological treatment of pea seeds to modify their nutritional value. The aim of this study was to compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giger-Reverdin, Sylvie, Maaroufi, Chiraze, Chapoutot, Patrick, Peyronnet, Corinne, Sauvant, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.90
_version_ 1782342934707830784
author Giger-Reverdin, Sylvie
Maaroufi, Chiraze
Chapoutot, Patrick
Peyronnet, Corinne
Sauvant, Daniel
author_facet Giger-Reverdin, Sylvie
Maaroufi, Chiraze
Chapoutot, Patrick
Peyronnet, Corinne
Sauvant, Daniel
author_sort Giger-Reverdin, Sylvie
collection PubMed
description In ruminant nutrition, peas are characterized by high protein solubility and degradability, which impair its protein value estimated by the official in situ method. Grinding can be used as a technological treatment of pea seeds to modify their nutritional value. The aim of this study was to compare the in situ method with an in vitro method on the same pea either in a coarse pea flour form (PCF) or in a ground pea fine flour form (PFF) to understand the effect of grinding. Both forms were also reground (GPCF and GPFF). PCF presented a lower rate of in vitro degradation than PFF, and more stable fermentation parameters (pH, ammonia, soluble carbohydrates) even if gas production was higher for the PCF after 48 h of incubation. In situ dry matter and protein degradation were lower for PCF than those for PFF; these differences were more marked than with the in vitro method. Reground peas were very similar to PFF. The values for pea protein digestible in the intestine (PDI) were higher for PCF than those for PFF. This study points out the high sensitivity of the in situ method to grinding. The study needs to be validated by in vivo measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4221829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42218292014-12-03 Influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants: comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches Giger-Reverdin, Sylvie Maaroufi, Chiraze Chapoutot, Patrick Peyronnet, Corinne Sauvant, Daniel Food Sci Nutr Original Research In ruminant nutrition, peas are characterized by high protein solubility and degradability, which impair its protein value estimated by the official in situ method. Grinding can be used as a technological treatment of pea seeds to modify their nutritional value. The aim of this study was to compare the in situ method with an in vitro method on the same pea either in a coarse pea flour form (PCF) or in a ground pea fine flour form (PFF) to understand the effect of grinding. Both forms were also reground (GPCF and GPFF). PCF presented a lower rate of in vitro degradation than PFF, and more stable fermentation parameters (pH, ammonia, soluble carbohydrates) even if gas production was higher for the PCF after 48 h of incubation. In situ dry matter and protein degradation were lower for PCF than those for PFF; these differences were more marked than with the in vitro method. Reground peas were very similar to PFF. The values for pea protein digestible in the intestine (PDI) were higher for PCF than those for PFF. This study points out the high sensitivity of the in situ method to grinding. The study needs to be validated by in vivo measurements. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-07 2014-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4221829/ /pubmed/25473488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.90 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Giger-Reverdin, Sylvie
Maaroufi, Chiraze
Chapoutot, Patrick
Peyronnet, Corinne
Sauvant, Daniel
Influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants: comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches
title Influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants: comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches
title_full Influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants: comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches
title_fullStr Influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants: comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches
title_full_unstemmed Influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants: comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches
title_short Influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants: comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches
title_sort influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants: comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.90
work_keys_str_mv AT gigerreverdinsylvie influenceofgrindingonthenutritivevalueofpeasforruminantscomparisonbetweeninvitroandinsituapproaches
AT maaroufichiraze influenceofgrindingonthenutritivevalueofpeasforruminantscomparisonbetweeninvitroandinsituapproaches
AT chapoutotpatrick influenceofgrindingonthenutritivevalueofpeasforruminantscomparisonbetweeninvitroandinsituapproaches
AT peyronnetcorinne influenceofgrindingonthenutritivevalueofpeasforruminantscomparisonbetweeninvitroandinsituapproaches
AT sauvantdaniel influenceofgrindingonthenutritivevalueofpeasforruminantscomparisonbetweeninvitroandinsituapproaches