Cargando…

Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: To compare the accuracy of different imaging modalities, alone and in combination in predicting findings at surgery after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Following chemoradiation, tumors were reclassified on the basis of findings on pelvic compute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickman, Ram, Kundel, Yulia, Levy-Drummer, Rachel, Purim, Ofer, Wasserberg, Nir, Fenig, Eyal, Sulkes, Aaron, Brenner, Baruch
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24286200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-278
_version_ 1782342971618754560
author Dickman, Ram
Kundel, Yulia
Levy-Drummer, Rachel
Purim, Ofer
Wasserberg, Nir
Fenig, Eyal
Sulkes, Aaron
Brenner, Baruch
author_facet Dickman, Ram
Kundel, Yulia
Levy-Drummer, Rachel
Purim, Ofer
Wasserberg, Nir
Fenig, Eyal
Sulkes, Aaron
Brenner, Baruch
author_sort Dickman, Ram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the accuracy of different imaging modalities, alone and in combination in predicting findings at surgery after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Following chemoradiation, tumors were reclassified on the basis of findings on pelvic computed tomography (CT) (94 patients), endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) (138 patients) alone or by both CT and EUS (80 patients). The ability of the imaging modalities, to predict the pathologic T status, N status, and TNM stage at surgery was evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 64.5 years (range 28–88 years); 55% were male. CT and EUS combined had a positive predictive value of 20% for pathologic pT1 stage, 29% for pT1, 29% for pT2, and 58% for pT3. Predictive values for the operative TNM stage were 50% for stage I, 45% for stage II, and 31% for stage III. These values did not exceed those for each modality alone. CONCLUSION: The performance of preoperative CT and EUS in predicting the T and TNM stage of rectal cancer at surgery is poor. Neither modality alone nor the two combined is sufficiently accurate to serve as the basis for decisions regarding treatment modification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4222036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42220362014-11-07 Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study Dickman, Ram Kundel, Yulia Levy-Drummer, Rachel Purim, Ofer Wasserberg, Nir Fenig, Eyal Sulkes, Aaron Brenner, Baruch Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the accuracy of different imaging modalities, alone and in combination in predicting findings at surgery after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Following chemoradiation, tumors were reclassified on the basis of findings on pelvic computed tomography (CT) (94 patients), endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) (138 patients) alone or by both CT and EUS (80 patients). The ability of the imaging modalities, to predict the pathologic T status, N status, and TNM stage at surgery was evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 64.5 years (range 28–88 years); 55% were male. CT and EUS combined had a positive predictive value of 20% for pathologic pT1 stage, 29% for pT1, 29% for pT2, and 58% for pT3. Predictive values for the operative TNM stage were 50% for stage I, 45% for stage II, and 31% for stage III. These values did not exceed those for each modality alone. CONCLUSION: The performance of preoperative CT and EUS in predicting the T and TNM stage of rectal cancer at surgery is poor. Neither modality alone nor the two combined is sufficiently accurate to serve as the basis for decisions regarding treatment modification. BioMed Central 2013-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4222036/ /pubmed/24286200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-278 Text en Copyright © 2013 Dickman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Dickman, Ram
Kundel, Yulia
Levy-Drummer, Rachel
Purim, Ofer
Wasserberg, Nir
Fenig, Eyal
Sulkes, Aaron
Brenner, Baruch
Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study
title Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study
title_full Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study
title_fullStr Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study
title_short Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study
title_sort restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24286200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-278
work_keys_str_mv AT dickmanram restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy
AT kundelyulia restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy
AT levydrummerrachel restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy
AT purimofer restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy
AT wasserbergnir restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy
AT fenigeyal restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy
AT sulkesaaron restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy
AT brennerbaruch restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy