Cargando…
Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study
BACKGROUND: To compare the accuracy of different imaging modalities, alone and in combination in predicting findings at surgery after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Following chemoradiation, tumors were reclassified on the basis of findings on pelvic compute...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24286200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-278 |
_version_ | 1782342971618754560 |
---|---|
author | Dickman, Ram Kundel, Yulia Levy-Drummer, Rachel Purim, Ofer Wasserberg, Nir Fenig, Eyal Sulkes, Aaron Brenner, Baruch |
author_facet | Dickman, Ram Kundel, Yulia Levy-Drummer, Rachel Purim, Ofer Wasserberg, Nir Fenig, Eyal Sulkes, Aaron Brenner, Baruch |
author_sort | Dickman, Ram |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the accuracy of different imaging modalities, alone and in combination in predicting findings at surgery after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Following chemoradiation, tumors were reclassified on the basis of findings on pelvic computed tomography (CT) (94 patients), endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) (138 patients) alone or by both CT and EUS (80 patients). The ability of the imaging modalities, to predict the pathologic T status, N status, and TNM stage at surgery was evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 64.5 years (range 28–88 years); 55% were male. CT and EUS combined had a positive predictive value of 20% for pathologic pT1 stage, 29% for pT1, 29% for pT2, and 58% for pT3. Predictive values for the operative TNM stage were 50% for stage I, 45% for stage II, and 31% for stage III. These values did not exceed those for each modality alone. CONCLUSION: The performance of preoperative CT and EUS in predicting the T and TNM stage of rectal cancer at surgery is poor. Neither modality alone nor the two combined is sufficiently accurate to serve as the basis for decisions regarding treatment modification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4222036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42220362014-11-07 Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study Dickman, Ram Kundel, Yulia Levy-Drummer, Rachel Purim, Ofer Wasserberg, Nir Fenig, Eyal Sulkes, Aaron Brenner, Baruch Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the accuracy of different imaging modalities, alone and in combination in predicting findings at surgery after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Following chemoradiation, tumors were reclassified on the basis of findings on pelvic computed tomography (CT) (94 patients), endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) (138 patients) alone or by both CT and EUS (80 patients). The ability of the imaging modalities, to predict the pathologic T status, N status, and TNM stage at surgery was evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 64.5 years (range 28–88 years); 55% were male. CT and EUS combined had a positive predictive value of 20% for pathologic pT1 stage, 29% for pT1, 29% for pT2, and 58% for pT3. Predictive values for the operative TNM stage were 50% for stage I, 45% for stage II, and 31% for stage III. These values did not exceed those for each modality alone. CONCLUSION: The performance of preoperative CT and EUS in predicting the T and TNM stage of rectal cancer at surgery is poor. Neither modality alone nor the two combined is sufficiently accurate to serve as the basis for decisions regarding treatment modification. BioMed Central 2013-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4222036/ /pubmed/24286200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-278 Text en Copyright © 2013 Dickman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Dickman, Ram Kundel, Yulia Levy-Drummer, Rachel Purim, Ofer Wasserberg, Nir Fenig, Eyal Sulkes, Aaron Brenner, Baruch Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study |
title | Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study |
title_full | Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study |
title_short | Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study |
title_sort | restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24286200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dickmanram restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy AT kundelyulia restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy AT levydrummerrachel restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy AT purimofer restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy AT wasserbergnir restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy AT fenigeyal restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy AT sulkesaaron restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy AT brennerbaruch restaginglocallyadvancedrectalcancerbydifferentimagingmodalitiesafterpreoperativechemoradiationacomparativestudy |