Cargando…

Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]

BACKGROUND: Infected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease that nearly always requires intervention. Traditionally, primary open necrosectomy has been the treatment of choice. In recent years, the surgical step-up approach, consisting of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Brunschot, Sandra, van Grinsven, Janneke, Voermans, Rogier P, Bakker, Olaf J, Besselink, Marc GH, Boermeester, Marja A, Bollen, Thomas L, Bosscha, Koop, Bouwense, Stefan A, Bruno, Marco J, Cappendijk, Vincent C, Consten, Esther C, Dejong, Cornelis H, Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW, van Eijck, Casper H, Erkelens, G Willemien, van Goor, Harry, Hadithi, Mohammed, Haveman, Jan-Willem, Hofker, Sijbrand H, Jansen, Jeroen JM, Laméris, Johan S, van Lienden, Krijn P, Manusama, Eric R, Meijssen, Maarten A, Mulder, Chris J, Nieuwenhuis, Vincent B, Poley, Jan-Werner, de Ridder, Rogier J, Rosman, Camiel, Schaapherder, Alexander F, Scheepers, Joris J, Schoon, Erik J, Seerden, Tom, Spanier, BW Marcel, Straathof, Jan Willem A, Timmer, Robin, Venneman, Niels G, Vleggaar, Frank P, Witteman, Ben J, Gooszen, Hein G, van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, Fockens, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24274589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-161
_version_ 1782343004667772928
author van Brunschot, Sandra
van Grinsven, Janneke
Voermans, Rogier P
Bakker, Olaf J
Besselink, Marc GH
Boermeester, Marja A
Bollen, Thomas L
Bosscha, Koop
Bouwense, Stefan A
Bruno, Marco J
Cappendijk, Vincent C
Consten, Esther C
Dejong, Cornelis H
Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW
van Eijck, Casper H
Erkelens, G Willemien
van Goor, Harry
Hadithi, Mohammed
Haveman, Jan-Willem
Hofker, Sijbrand H
Jansen, Jeroen JM
Laméris, Johan S
van Lienden, Krijn P
Manusama, Eric R
Meijssen, Maarten A
Mulder, Chris J
Nieuwenhuis, Vincent B
Poley, Jan-Werner
de Ridder, Rogier J
Rosman, Camiel
Schaapherder, Alexander F
Scheepers, Joris J
Schoon, Erik J
Seerden, Tom
Spanier, BW Marcel
Straathof, Jan Willem A
Timmer, Robin
Venneman, Niels G
Vleggaar, Frank P
Witteman, Ben J
Gooszen, Hein G
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C
Fockens, Paul
author_facet van Brunschot, Sandra
van Grinsven, Janneke
Voermans, Rogier P
Bakker, Olaf J
Besselink, Marc GH
Boermeester, Marja A
Bollen, Thomas L
Bosscha, Koop
Bouwense, Stefan A
Bruno, Marco J
Cappendijk, Vincent C
Consten, Esther C
Dejong, Cornelis H
Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW
van Eijck, Casper H
Erkelens, G Willemien
van Goor, Harry
Hadithi, Mohammed
Haveman, Jan-Willem
Hofker, Sijbrand H
Jansen, Jeroen JM
Laméris, Johan S
van Lienden, Krijn P
Manusama, Eric R
Meijssen, Maarten A
Mulder, Chris J
Nieuwenhuis, Vincent B
Poley, Jan-Werner
de Ridder, Rogier J
Rosman, Camiel
Schaapherder, Alexander F
Scheepers, Joris J
Schoon, Erik J
Seerden, Tom
Spanier, BW Marcel
Straathof, Jan Willem A
Timmer, Robin
Venneman, Niels G
Vleggaar, Frank P
Witteman, Ben J
Gooszen, Hein G
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C
Fockens, Paul
author_sort van Brunschot, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease that nearly always requires intervention. Traditionally, primary open necrosectomy has been the treatment of choice. In recent years, the surgical step-up approach, consisting of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by (minimally invasive) surgical necrosectomy has become the standard of care. A promising minimally invasive alternative is the endoscopic transluminal step-up approach. This approach consists of endoscopic transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy. We hypothesise that the less invasive endoscopic step-up approach is superior to the surgical step-up approach in terms of clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: The TENSION trial is a randomised controlled, parallel-group superiority multicenter trial. Patients with (suspected) infected necrotising pancreatitis with an indication for intervention and in whom both treatment modalities are deemed possible, will be randomised to either an endoscopic transluminal or a surgical step-up approach. During a 4 year study period, 98 patients will be enrolled from 24 hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. The primary endpoint is a composite of death and major complications within 6 months following randomisation. Secondary endpoints include complications such as pancreaticocutaneous fistula, exocrine or endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, need for additional radiological, endoscopic or surgical intervention, the need for necrosectomy after drainage, the number of (re-)interventions, quality of life, and total direct and indirect costs. DISCUSSION: The TENSION trial will answer the question whether an endoscopic step-up approach reduces the combined primary endpoint of death and major complications, as well as hospital stay and related costs compared with a surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4222267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42222672014-11-07 Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711] van Brunschot, Sandra van Grinsven, Janneke Voermans, Rogier P Bakker, Olaf J Besselink, Marc GH Boermeester, Marja A Bollen, Thomas L Bosscha, Koop Bouwense, Stefan A Bruno, Marco J Cappendijk, Vincent C Consten, Esther C Dejong, Cornelis H Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW van Eijck, Casper H Erkelens, G Willemien van Goor, Harry Hadithi, Mohammed Haveman, Jan-Willem Hofker, Sijbrand H Jansen, Jeroen JM Laméris, Johan S van Lienden, Krijn P Manusama, Eric R Meijssen, Maarten A Mulder, Chris J Nieuwenhuis, Vincent B Poley, Jan-Werner de Ridder, Rogier J Rosman, Camiel Schaapherder, Alexander F Scheepers, Joris J Schoon, Erik J Seerden, Tom Spanier, BW Marcel Straathof, Jan Willem A Timmer, Robin Venneman, Niels G Vleggaar, Frank P Witteman, Ben J Gooszen, Hein G van Santvoort, Hjalmar C Fockens, Paul BMC Gastroenterol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Infected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease that nearly always requires intervention. Traditionally, primary open necrosectomy has been the treatment of choice. In recent years, the surgical step-up approach, consisting of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by (minimally invasive) surgical necrosectomy has become the standard of care. A promising minimally invasive alternative is the endoscopic transluminal step-up approach. This approach consists of endoscopic transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy. We hypothesise that the less invasive endoscopic step-up approach is superior to the surgical step-up approach in terms of clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: The TENSION trial is a randomised controlled, parallel-group superiority multicenter trial. Patients with (suspected) infected necrotising pancreatitis with an indication for intervention and in whom both treatment modalities are deemed possible, will be randomised to either an endoscopic transluminal or a surgical step-up approach. During a 4 year study period, 98 patients will be enrolled from 24 hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. The primary endpoint is a composite of death and major complications within 6 months following randomisation. Secondary endpoints include complications such as pancreaticocutaneous fistula, exocrine or endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, need for additional radiological, endoscopic or surgical intervention, the need for necrosectomy after drainage, the number of (re-)interventions, quality of life, and total direct and indirect costs. DISCUSSION: The TENSION trial will answer the question whether an endoscopic step-up approach reduces the combined primary endpoint of death and major complications, as well as hospital stay and related costs compared with a surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis. BioMed Central 2013-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4222267/ /pubmed/24274589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-161 Text en Copyright © 2013 van Brunschot et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van Brunschot, Sandra
van Grinsven, Janneke
Voermans, Rogier P
Bakker, Olaf J
Besselink, Marc GH
Boermeester, Marja A
Bollen, Thomas L
Bosscha, Koop
Bouwense, Stefan A
Bruno, Marco J
Cappendijk, Vincent C
Consten, Esther C
Dejong, Cornelis H
Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW
van Eijck, Casper H
Erkelens, G Willemien
van Goor, Harry
Hadithi, Mohammed
Haveman, Jan-Willem
Hofker, Sijbrand H
Jansen, Jeroen JM
Laméris, Johan S
van Lienden, Krijn P
Manusama, Eric R
Meijssen, Maarten A
Mulder, Chris J
Nieuwenhuis, Vincent B
Poley, Jan-Werner
de Ridder, Rogier J
Rosman, Camiel
Schaapherder, Alexander F
Scheepers, Joris J
Schoon, Erik J
Seerden, Tom
Spanier, BW Marcel
Straathof, Jan Willem A
Timmer, Robin
Venneman, Niels G
Vleggaar, Frank P
Witteman, Ben J
Gooszen, Hein G
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C
Fockens, Paul
Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]
title Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]
title_full Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]
title_fullStr Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]
title_full_unstemmed Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]
title_short Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]
title_sort transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (tension trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [isrctn09186711]
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24274589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-161
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbrunschotsandra transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT vangrinsvenjanneke transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT voermansrogierp transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT bakkerolafj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT besselinkmarcgh transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT boermeestermarjaa transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT bollenthomasl transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT bosschakoop transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT bouwensestefana transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT brunomarcoj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT cappendijkvincentc transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT constenestherc transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT dejongcornelish transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT dijkgraafmarcelgw transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT vaneijckcasperh transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT erkelensgwillemien transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT vangoorharry transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT hadithimohammed transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT havemanjanwillem transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT hofkersijbrandh transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT jansenjeroenjm transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT lamerisjohans transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT vanliendenkrijnp transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT manusamaericr transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT meijssenmaartena transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT mulderchrisj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT nieuwenhuisvincentb transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT poleyjanwerner transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT deridderrogierj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT rosmancamiel transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT schaapherderalexanderf transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT scheepersjorisj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT schoonerikj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT seerdentom transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT spanierbwmarcel transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT straathofjanwillema transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT timmerrobin transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT vennemannielsg transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT vleggaarfrankp transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT wittemanbenj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT gooszenheing transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT vansantvoorthjalmarc transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711
AT fockenspaul transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711