Cargando…
Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]
BACKGROUND: Infected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease that nearly always requires intervention. Traditionally, primary open necrosectomy has been the treatment of choice. In recent years, the surgical step-up approach, consisting of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24274589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-161 |
_version_ | 1782343004667772928 |
---|---|
author | van Brunschot, Sandra van Grinsven, Janneke Voermans, Rogier P Bakker, Olaf J Besselink, Marc GH Boermeester, Marja A Bollen, Thomas L Bosscha, Koop Bouwense, Stefan A Bruno, Marco J Cappendijk, Vincent C Consten, Esther C Dejong, Cornelis H Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW van Eijck, Casper H Erkelens, G Willemien van Goor, Harry Hadithi, Mohammed Haveman, Jan-Willem Hofker, Sijbrand H Jansen, Jeroen JM Laméris, Johan S van Lienden, Krijn P Manusama, Eric R Meijssen, Maarten A Mulder, Chris J Nieuwenhuis, Vincent B Poley, Jan-Werner de Ridder, Rogier J Rosman, Camiel Schaapherder, Alexander F Scheepers, Joris J Schoon, Erik J Seerden, Tom Spanier, BW Marcel Straathof, Jan Willem A Timmer, Robin Venneman, Niels G Vleggaar, Frank P Witteman, Ben J Gooszen, Hein G van Santvoort, Hjalmar C Fockens, Paul |
author_facet | van Brunschot, Sandra van Grinsven, Janneke Voermans, Rogier P Bakker, Olaf J Besselink, Marc GH Boermeester, Marja A Bollen, Thomas L Bosscha, Koop Bouwense, Stefan A Bruno, Marco J Cappendijk, Vincent C Consten, Esther C Dejong, Cornelis H Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW van Eijck, Casper H Erkelens, G Willemien van Goor, Harry Hadithi, Mohammed Haveman, Jan-Willem Hofker, Sijbrand H Jansen, Jeroen JM Laméris, Johan S van Lienden, Krijn P Manusama, Eric R Meijssen, Maarten A Mulder, Chris J Nieuwenhuis, Vincent B Poley, Jan-Werner de Ridder, Rogier J Rosman, Camiel Schaapherder, Alexander F Scheepers, Joris J Schoon, Erik J Seerden, Tom Spanier, BW Marcel Straathof, Jan Willem A Timmer, Robin Venneman, Niels G Vleggaar, Frank P Witteman, Ben J Gooszen, Hein G van Santvoort, Hjalmar C Fockens, Paul |
author_sort | van Brunschot, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Infected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease that nearly always requires intervention. Traditionally, primary open necrosectomy has been the treatment of choice. In recent years, the surgical step-up approach, consisting of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by (minimally invasive) surgical necrosectomy has become the standard of care. A promising minimally invasive alternative is the endoscopic transluminal step-up approach. This approach consists of endoscopic transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy. We hypothesise that the less invasive endoscopic step-up approach is superior to the surgical step-up approach in terms of clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: The TENSION trial is a randomised controlled, parallel-group superiority multicenter trial. Patients with (suspected) infected necrotising pancreatitis with an indication for intervention and in whom both treatment modalities are deemed possible, will be randomised to either an endoscopic transluminal or a surgical step-up approach. During a 4 year study period, 98 patients will be enrolled from 24 hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. The primary endpoint is a composite of death and major complications within 6 months following randomisation. Secondary endpoints include complications such as pancreaticocutaneous fistula, exocrine or endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, need for additional radiological, endoscopic or surgical intervention, the need for necrosectomy after drainage, the number of (re-)interventions, quality of life, and total direct and indirect costs. DISCUSSION: The TENSION trial will answer the question whether an endoscopic step-up approach reduces the combined primary endpoint of death and major complications, as well as hospital stay and related costs compared with a surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4222267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42222672014-11-07 Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711] van Brunschot, Sandra van Grinsven, Janneke Voermans, Rogier P Bakker, Olaf J Besselink, Marc GH Boermeester, Marja A Bollen, Thomas L Bosscha, Koop Bouwense, Stefan A Bruno, Marco J Cappendijk, Vincent C Consten, Esther C Dejong, Cornelis H Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW van Eijck, Casper H Erkelens, G Willemien van Goor, Harry Hadithi, Mohammed Haveman, Jan-Willem Hofker, Sijbrand H Jansen, Jeroen JM Laméris, Johan S van Lienden, Krijn P Manusama, Eric R Meijssen, Maarten A Mulder, Chris J Nieuwenhuis, Vincent B Poley, Jan-Werner de Ridder, Rogier J Rosman, Camiel Schaapherder, Alexander F Scheepers, Joris J Schoon, Erik J Seerden, Tom Spanier, BW Marcel Straathof, Jan Willem A Timmer, Robin Venneman, Niels G Vleggaar, Frank P Witteman, Ben J Gooszen, Hein G van Santvoort, Hjalmar C Fockens, Paul BMC Gastroenterol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Infected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease that nearly always requires intervention. Traditionally, primary open necrosectomy has been the treatment of choice. In recent years, the surgical step-up approach, consisting of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by (minimally invasive) surgical necrosectomy has become the standard of care. A promising minimally invasive alternative is the endoscopic transluminal step-up approach. This approach consists of endoscopic transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy. We hypothesise that the less invasive endoscopic step-up approach is superior to the surgical step-up approach in terms of clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: The TENSION trial is a randomised controlled, parallel-group superiority multicenter trial. Patients with (suspected) infected necrotising pancreatitis with an indication for intervention and in whom both treatment modalities are deemed possible, will be randomised to either an endoscopic transluminal or a surgical step-up approach. During a 4 year study period, 98 patients will be enrolled from 24 hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. The primary endpoint is a composite of death and major complications within 6 months following randomisation. Secondary endpoints include complications such as pancreaticocutaneous fistula, exocrine or endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, need for additional radiological, endoscopic or surgical intervention, the need for necrosectomy after drainage, the number of (re-)interventions, quality of life, and total direct and indirect costs. DISCUSSION: The TENSION trial will answer the question whether an endoscopic step-up approach reduces the combined primary endpoint of death and major complications, as well as hospital stay and related costs compared with a surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis. BioMed Central 2013-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4222267/ /pubmed/24274589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-161 Text en Copyright © 2013 van Brunschot et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol van Brunschot, Sandra van Grinsven, Janneke Voermans, Rogier P Bakker, Olaf J Besselink, Marc GH Boermeester, Marja A Bollen, Thomas L Bosscha, Koop Bouwense, Stefan A Bruno, Marco J Cappendijk, Vincent C Consten, Esther C Dejong, Cornelis H Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW van Eijck, Casper H Erkelens, G Willemien van Goor, Harry Hadithi, Mohammed Haveman, Jan-Willem Hofker, Sijbrand H Jansen, Jeroen JM Laméris, Johan S van Lienden, Krijn P Manusama, Eric R Meijssen, Maarten A Mulder, Chris J Nieuwenhuis, Vincent B Poley, Jan-Werner de Ridder, Rogier J Rosman, Camiel Schaapherder, Alexander F Scheepers, Joris J Schoon, Erik J Seerden, Tom Spanier, BW Marcel Straathof, Jan Willem A Timmer, Robin Venneman, Niels G Vleggaar, Frank P Witteman, Ben J Gooszen, Hein G van Santvoort, Hjalmar C Fockens, Paul Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711] |
title | Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711] |
title_full | Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711] |
title_fullStr | Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711] |
title_full_unstemmed | Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711] |
title_short | Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711] |
title_sort | transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (tension trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [isrctn09186711] |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24274589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanbrunschotsandra transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT vangrinsvenjanneke transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT voermansrogierp transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT bakkerolafj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT besselinkmarcgh transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT boermeestermarjaa transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT bollenthomasl transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT bosschakoop transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT bouwensestefana transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT brunomarcoj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT cappendijkvincentc transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT constenestherc transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT dejongcornelish transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT dijkgraafmarcelgw transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT vaneijckcasperh transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT erkelensgwillemien transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT vangoorharry transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT hadithimohammed transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT havemanjanwillem transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT hofkersijbrandh transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT jansenjeroenjm transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT lamerisjohans transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT vanliendenkrijnp transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT manusamaericr transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT meijssenmaartena transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT mulderchrisj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT nieuwenhuisvincentb transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT poleyjanwerner transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT deridderrogierj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT rosmancamiel transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT schaapherderalexanderf transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT scheepersjorisj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT schoonerikj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT seerdentom transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT spanierbwmarcel transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT straathofjanwillema transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT timmerrobin transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT vennemannielsg transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT vleggaarfrankp transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT wittemanbenj transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT gooszenheing transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT vansantvoorthjalmarc transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 AT fockenspaul transluminalendoscopicstepupapproachversusminimallyinvasivesurgicalstepupapproachinpatientswithinfectednecrotisingpancreatitistensiontrialdesignandrationaleofarandomisedcontrolledmulticentertrialisrctn09186711 |