Cargando…

Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In the paediatric population, pain and distress associated with burn injuries during wound care procedures remain a constant challenge. Although silver dressings are the gold standard for burn care in Australasia, very few high-level trials have been conducted that compare silver dressin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gee Kee, Emma, Kimble, Roy M, Cuttle, Leila, Stockton, Kellie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24274190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-403
_version_ 1782343006531092480
author Gee Kee, Emma
Kimble, Roy M
Cuttle, Leila
Stockton, Kellie
author_facet Gee Kee, Emma
Kimble, Roy M
Cuttle, Leila
Stockton, Kellie
author_sort Gee Kee, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the paediatric population, pain and distress associated with burn injuries during wound care procedures remain a constant challenge. Although silver dressings are the gold standard for burn care in Australasia, very few high-level trials have been conducted that compare silver dressings to determine which will provide the best level of care clinically. Therefore, for paediatric patients in particular, identifying silver dressings that are associated with lower levels of pain and rapid wound re-epithelialisation is imperative. This study will determine whether there is a difference in time to re-epithelialisation and pain and distress experienced during wound care procedures among Acticoat™, Acticoat™ combined with Mepitel™ and Mepilex Ag™ dressings for acute, paediatric partial thickness burns. METHODS/DESIGN: Children aged 0 to 15 years with an acute partial thickness (superficial partial to deep partial thickness inclusive) burn injury and a burn total body surface area of ≤10% will be eligible for the trial. Patients will be randomised to one of the three dressing groups: (1) Acticoat™ or (2) Acticoat™ combined with Mepitel™ or (3) Mepilex Ag™. A minimum of 28 participants will be recruited for each treatment group. Primary measures of pain, distress and healing will be repeated at each dressing change until complete wound re-epithelialisation occurs or skin grafting is required. Additional data collected will include infection status at each dressing change, physical function, scar outcome and scar management requirements, cost effectiveness of each dressing and staff perspectives of the dressings. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will determine the effects of three commonly used silver and silicone burn dressing combinations on the rate of wound re-epithelialisation and pain experienced during dressing procedures in acute, paediatric partial thickness burn injuries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000105741
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4222277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42222772014-11-07 Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Gee Kee, Emma Kimble, Roy M Cuttle, Leila Stockton, Kellie Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the paediatric population, pain and distress associated with burn injuries during wound care procedures remain a constant challenge. Although silver dressings are the gold standard for burn care in Australasia, very few high-level trials have been conducted that compare silver dressings to determine which will provide the best level of care clinically. Therefore, for paediatric patients in particular, identifying silver dressings that are associated with lower levels of pain and rapid wound re-epithelialisation is imperative. This study will determine whether there is a difference in time to re-epithelialisation and pain and distress experienced during wound care procedures among Acticoat™, Acticoat™ combined with Mepitel™ and Mepilex Ag™ dressings for acute, paediatric partial thickness burns. METHODS/DESIGN: Children aged 0 to 15 years with an acute partial thickness (superficial partial to deep partial thickness inclusive) burn injury and a burn total body surface area of ≤10% will be eligible for the trial. Patients will be randomised to one of the three dressing groups: (1) Acticoat™ or (2) Acticoat™ combined with Mepitel™ or (3) Mepilex Ag™. A minimum of 28 participants will be recruited for each treatment group. Primary measures of pain, distress and healing will be repeated at each dressing change until complete wound re-epithelialisation occurs or skin grafting is required. Additional data collected will include infection status at each dressing change, physical function, scar outcome and scar management requirements, cost effectiveness of each dressing and staff perspectives of the dressings. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will determine the effects of three commonly used silver and silicone burn dressing combinations on the rate of wound re-epithelialisation and pain experienced during dressing procedures in acute, paediatric partial thickness burn injuries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000105741 BioMed Central 2013-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4222277/ /pubmed/24274190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-403 Text en Copyright © 2013 Gee Kee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gee Kee, Emma
Kimble, Roy M
Cuttle, Leila
Stockton, Kellie
Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24274190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-403
work_keys_str_mv AT geekeeemma comparisonofthreedifferentdressingsforpartialthicknessburnsinchildrenstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kimbleroym comparisonofthreedifferentdressingsforpartialthicknessburnsinchildrenstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cuttleleila comparisonofthreedifferentdressingsforpartialthicknessburnsinchildrenstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stocktonkellie comparisonofthreedifferentdressingsforpartialthicknessburnsinchildrenstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial