Cargando…

Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction

Targets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear in a probable target region as compared to a less probable target region, an effect which has been termed “probability cueing.” The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up target detection, but also...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goschy, Harriet, Bakos, Sarolta, Müller, Hermann J., Zehetleitner, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195
_version_ 1782343021227933696
author Goschy, Harriet
Bakos, Sarolta
Müller, Hermann J.
Zehetleitner, Michael
author_facet Goschy, Harriet
Bakos, Sarolta
Müller, Hermann J.
Zehetleitner, Michael
author_sort Goschy, Harriet
collection PubMed
description Targets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear in a probable target region as compared to a less probable target region, an effect which has been termed “probability cueing.” The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up target detection, but also minimize distraction by distractors in probable distractor regions as compared to distractors in less probable distractor regions. To this end, three visual search experiments with a salient, but task-irrelevant, distractor (“additional singleton”) were conducted. Experiment 1 demonstrated that observers can utilize uneven spatial distractor distributions to selectively reduce interference by distractors in frequent distractor regions as compared to distractors in rare distractor regions. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that intertrial facilitation, i.e., distractor position repetitions, and statistical learning (independent of distractor position repetitions) both contribute to the probability cueing effect for distractor locations. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that probability cueing of distractor locations has the potential to serve as a strong attentional cue for the shielding of likely distractor locations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4222347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42223472014-11-20 Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction Goschy, Harriet Bakos, Sarolta Müller, Hermann J. Zehetleitner, Michael Front Psychol Psychology Targets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear in a probable target region as compared to a less probable target region, an effect which has been termed “probability cueing.” The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up target detection, but also minimize distraction by distractors in probable distractor regions as compared to distractors in less probable distractor regions. To this end, three visual search experiments with a salient, but task-irrelevant, distractor (“additional singleton”) were conducted. Experiment 1 demonstrated that observers can utilize uneven spatial distractor distributions to selectively reduce interference by distractors in frequent distractor regions as compared to distractors in rare distractor regions. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that intertrial facilitation, i.e., distractor position repetitions, and statistical learning (independent of distractor position repetitions) both contribute to the probability cueing effect for distractor locations. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that probability cueing of distractor locations has the potential to serve as a strong attentional cue for the shielding of likely distractor locations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4222347/ /pubmed/25414676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195 Text en Copyright © 2014 Goschy, Bakos, Müller and Zehetleitner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Goschy, Harriet
Bakos, Sarolta
Müller, Hermann J.
Zehetleitner, Michael
Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_full Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_fullStr Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_full_unstemmed Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_short Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_sort probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195
work_keys_str_mv AT goschyharriet probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction
AT bakossarolta probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction
AT mullerhermannj probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction
AT zehetleitnermichael probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction