Cargando…
Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
Targets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear in a probable target region as compared to a less probable target region, an effect which has been termed “probability cueing.” The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up target detection, but also...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195 |
_version_ | 1782343021227933696 |
---|---|
author | Goschy, Harriet Bakos, Sarolta Müller, Hermann J. Zehetleitner, Michael |
author_facet | Goschy, Harriet Bakos, Sarolta Müller, Hermann J. Zehetleitner, Michael |
author_sort | Goschy, Harriet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Targets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear in a probable target region as compared to a less probable target region, an effect which has been termed “probability cueing.” The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up target detection, but also minimize distraction by distractors in probable distractor regions as compared to distractors in less probable distractor regions. To this end, three visual search experiments with a salient, but task-irrelevant, distractor (“additional singleton”) were conducted. Experiment 1 demonstrated that observers can utilize uneven spatial distractor distributions to selectively reduce interference by distractors in frequent distractor regions as compared to distractors in rare distractor regions. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that intertrial facilitation, i.e., distractor position repetitions, and statistical learning (independent of distractor position repetitions) both contribute to the probability cueing effect for distractor locations. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that probability cueing of distractor locations has the potential to serve as a strong attentional cue for the shielding of likely distractor locations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4222347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42223472014-11-20 Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction Goschy, Harriet Bakos, Sarolta Müller, Hermann J. Zehetleitner, Michael Front Psychol Psychology Targets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear in a probable target region as compared to a less probable target region, an effect which has been termed “probability cueing.” The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up target detection, but also minimize distraction by distractors in probable distractor regions as compared to distractors in less probable distractor regions. To this end, three visual search experiments with a salient, but task-irrelevant, distractor (“additional singleton”) were conducted. Experiment 1 demonstrated that observers can utilize uneven spatial distractor distributions to selectively reduce interference by distractors in frequent distractor regions as compared to distractors in rare distractor regions. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that intertrial facilitation, i.e., distractor position repetitions, and statistical learning (independent of distractor position repetitions) both contribute to the probability cueing effect for distractor locations. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that probability cueing of distractor locations has the potential to serve as a strong attentional cue for the shielding of likely distractor locations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4222347/ /pubmed/25414676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195 Text en Copyright © 2014 Goschy, Bakos, Müller and Zehetleitner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Goschy, Harriet Bakos, Sarolta Müller, Hermann J. Zehetleitner, Michael Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction |
title | Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction |
title_full | Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction |
title_fullStr | Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction |
title_short | Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction |
title_sort | probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goschyharriet probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction AT bakossarolta probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction AT mullerhermannj probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction AT zehetleitnermichael probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction |