Cargando…

Reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Food availability is an important environmental cue for animals for deciding how much to invest in reproduction, and it ultimately affects population size. The importance of food limitation has been extensively studied in terrestrial vertebrate populations, especially in birds, by expe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruffino, Lise, Salo, Pälvi, Koivisto, Elina, Banks, Peter B, Korpimäki, Erkki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-014-0080-y
_version_ 1782343025219862528
author Ruffino, Lise
Salo, Pälvi
Koivisto, Elina
Banks, Peter B
Korpimäki, Erkki
author_facet Ruffino, Lise
Salo, Pälvi
Koivisto, Elina
Banks, Peter B
Korpimäki, Erkki
author_sort Ruffino, Lise
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Food availability is an important environmental cue for animals for deciding how much to invest in reproduction, and it ultimately affects population size. The importance of food limitation has been extensively studied in terrestrial vertebrate populations, especially in birds, by experimentally manipulating food supply. However, the factors explaining variation in reproductive decisions in response to food supplementation remain unclear. By performing meta-analyses, we aim to quantify the extent to which supplementary feeding affects several reproductive parameters in birds, and identify the key factors (life-history traits, behavioural factors, environmental factors, and experimental design) that can induce variation in laying date, clutch size and breeding success (i.e., number of fledglings produced) in response to food supplementation. RESULTS: Food supplementation produced variable but mostly positive effects across reproductive parameters in a total of 201 experiments from 82 independent studies. The outcomes of the food effect were modulated by environmental factors, e.g., laying dates advanced more towards low latitudes, and food supplementation appeared not to produce any obvious effect on bird reproduction when the background level of food abundance in the environment was high. Moreover, the increase in clutch size following food addition was more pronounced in birds that cache food, as compared to birds that do not. Supplementation timing was identified as a major cause of variation in breeding success responses. We also document the absence of a detectable food effect on clutch size and breeding success when the target species had poor access to the feed due to competitive interactions with other animals. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that, from the pool of bird species and environments reviewed, extra food is allocated to immediate reproduction in most cases. Our results also support the view that bird species have evolved different life-history strategies to cope with environmental variability in food supply. However, we encourage more research at low latitudes to gain knowledge on how resource allocation in birds changes along a latitudinal gradient. Our results also emphasize the importance of developing experimental designs that minimise competition for the supplemented food and the risk of reproductive bottle-necks due to inappropriate supplementation timings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12983-014-0080-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4222371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42223712014-11-10 Reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: a meta-analysis Ruffino, Lise Salo, Pälvi Koivisto, Elina Banks, Peter B Korpimäki, Erkki Front Zool Research INTRODUCTION: Food availability is an important environmental cue for animals for deciding how much to invest in reproduction, and it ultimately affects population size. The importance of food limitation has been extensively studied in terrestrial vertebrate populations, especially in birds, by experimentally manipulating food supply. However, the factors explaining variation in reproductive decisions in response to food supplementation remain unclear. By performing meta-analyses, we aim to quantify the extent to which supplementary feeding affects several reproductive parameters in birds, and identify the key factors (life-history traits, behavioural factors, environmental factors, and experimental design) that can induce variation in laying date, clutch size and breeding success (i.e., number of fledglings produced) in response to food supplementation. RESULTS: Food supplementation produced variable but mostly positive effects across reproductive parameters in a total of 201 experiments from 82 independent studies. The outcomes of the food effect were modulated by environmental factors, e.g., laying dates advanced more towards low latitudes, and food supplementation appeared not to produce any obvious effect on bird reproduction when the background level of food abundance in the environment was high. Moreover, the increase in clutch size following food addition was more pronounced in birds that cache food, as compared to birds that do not. Supplementation timing was identified as a major cause of variation in breeding success responses. We also document the absence of a detectable food effect on clutch size and breeding success when the target species had poor access to the feed due to competitive interactions with other animals. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that, from the pool of bird species and environments reviewed, extra food is allocated to immediate reproduction in most cases. Our results also support the view that bird species have evolved different life-history strategies to cope with environmental variability in food supply. However, we encourage more research at low latitudes to gain knowledge on how resource allocation in birds changes along a latitudinal gradient. Our results also emphasize the importance of developing experimental designs that minimise competition for the supplemented food and the risk of reproductive bottle-necks due to inappropriate supplementation timings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12983-014-0080-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4222371/ /pubmed/25386221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-014-0080-y Text en © Ruffino et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ruffino, Lise
Salo, Pälvi
Koivisto, Elina
Banks, Peter B
Korpimäki, Erkki
Reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: a meta-analysis
title Reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: a meta-analysis
title_full Reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: a meta-analysis
title_short Reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: a meta-analysis
title_sort reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-014-0080-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ruffinolise reproductiveresponsesofbirdstoexperimentalfoodsupplementationametaanalysis
AT salopalvi reproductiveresponsesofbirdstoexperimentalfoodsupplementationametaanalysis
AT koivistoelina reproductiveresponsesofbirdstoexperimentalfoodsupplementationametaanalysis
AT bankspeterb reproductiveresponsesofbirdstoexperimentalfoodsupplementationametaanalysis
AT korpimakierkki reproductiveresponsesofbirdstoexperimentalfoodsupplementationametaanalysis