Cargando…

Comparison of Neuroretinal Rim Area Measurements Made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II

PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement between neuroretinal rim area (RA) measurements using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I (HRT Classic) and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II). To compare apparent RA changes in follow-up series of HRT II topographies when using either an HRT Classic or HRT I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ya Xing, O’Leary, Neil, Strouthidis, Nicholas G., White, Edward T., Ho, Tuan A., Garway-Heath, David F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Raven Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22576170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318255da30
_version_ 1782343105233551360
author Wang, Ya Xing
O’Leary, Neil
Strouthidis, Nicholas G.
White, Edward T.
Ho, Tuan A.
Garway-Heath, David F.
author_facet Wang, Ya Xing
O’Leary, Neil
Strouthidis, Nicholas G.
White, Edward T.
Ho, Tuan A.
Garway-Heath, David F.
author_sort Wang, Ya Xing
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement between neuroretinal rim area (RA) measurements using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I (HRT Classic) and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II). To compare apparent RA changes in follow-up series of HRT II topographies when using either an HRT Classic or HRT II mean topography as baseline. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study and “no-change,” short time series study. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three ocular hypertensive and 31 primary open angle glaucoma subjects. METHODS: Five HRT Classic and 5 HRT II examinations were acquired from 1 eye of each subject, across 2 visits within 6 weeks. For the cross-sectional study, follow-up RA measurements from HRT Classic and HRT II were compared, using the same HRT Classic mean topography as the baseline. The linear rates of RA change were compared in 2 short time series with either an HRT Classic or an HRT II mean topography as baseline, and 4 follow-up HRT II mean topographies. Intervals between topographies were arbitrarily set at 1 year for meaningful comparisons of rates. Rates of RA change over time were calculated by linear regression. Separate analyses were performed using 3 available reference planes (RP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Global and sectoral RA measurements in HRT Classic and HRT II mean topographies; linear rates of RA change. RESULTS: HRT Classic minus HRT II mean differences (95% limits of agreement) were 0.09 (−0.17, 0.35) mm(2), 0.09 (−0.13, 0.32) mm(2), and 0.11 (−0.24, 0.46) mm(2) for the Moorfields, 320 µm, and standard RPs, respectively (P<0.001 for all RPs, Wilcoxon rank sum test). In the time series, the mean differences (95% limits of agreement) of RA rates of change (HRT Classic baseline minus HRT II baseline) were −0.01 (−0.06, 0.03) mm(2)/y, −0.01 (−0.06, 0.04) mm(2)/y, and −0.0(2) (−0.09, 0.05) mm(2)/y using the Moorfields, 320 µm, and standard RPs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although HRT software is backward-compatible, follow-up RA measurements made in the same eye using HRT Classic and HRT II devices display statistically and clinically meaningful systematic differences when HRT Classic topographies are used as a baseline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4222790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Raven Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42227902014-11-07 Comparison of Neuroretinal Rim Area Measurements Made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II Wang, Ya Xing O’Leary, Neil Strouthidis, Nicholas G. White, Edward T. Ho, Tuan A. Garway-Heath, David F. J Glaucoma Original Studies PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement between neuroretinal rim area (RA) measurements using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I (HRT Classic) and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II). To compare apparent RA changes in follow-up series of HRT II topographies when using either an HRT Classic or HRT II mean topography as baseline. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study and “no-change,” short time series study. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three ocular hypertensive and 31 primary open angle glaucoma subjects. METHODS: Five HRT Classic and 5 HRT II examinations were acquired from 1 eye of each subject, across 2 visits within 6 weeks. For the cross-sectional study, follow-up RA measurements from HRT Classic and HRT II were compared, using the same HRT Classic mean topography as the baseline. The linear rates of RA change were compared in 2 short time series with either an HRT Classic or an HRT II mean topography as baseline, and 4 follow-up HRT II mean topographies. Intervals between topographies were arbitrarily set at 1 year for meaningful comparisons of rates. Rates of RA change over time were calculated by linear regression. Separate analyses were performed using 3 available reference planes (RP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Global and sectoral RA measurements in HRT Classic and HRT II mean topographies; linear rates of RA change. RESULTS: HRT Classic minus HRT II mean differences (95% limits of agreement) were 0.09 (−0.17, 0.35) mm(2), 0.09 (−0.13, 0.32) mm(2), and 0.11 (−0.24, 0.46) mm(2) for the Moorfields, 320 µm, and standard RPs, respectively (P<0.001 for all RPs, Wilcoxon rank sum test). In the time series, the mean differences (95% limits of agreement) of RA rates of change (HRT Classic baseline minus HRT II baseline) were −0.01 (−0.06, 0.03) mm(2)/y, −0.01 (−0.06, 0.04) mm(2)/y, and −0.0(2) (−0.09, 0.05) mm(2)/y using the Moorfields, 320 µm, and standard RPs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although HRT software is backward-compatible, follow-up RA measurements made in the same eye using HRT Classic and HRT II devices display statistically and clinically meaningful systematic differences when HRT Classic topographies are used as a baseline. Raven Press 2013-10 2013-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4222790/ /pubmed/22576170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318255da30 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0.
spellingShingle Original Studies
Wang, Ya Xing
O’Leary, Neil
Strouthidis, Nicholas G.
White, Edward T.
Ho, Tuan A.
Garway-Heath, David F.
Comparison of Neuroretinal Rim Area Measurements Made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II
title Comparison of Neuroretinal Rim Area Measurements Made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II
title_full Comparison of Neuroretinal Rim Area Measurements Made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II
title_fullStr Comparison of Neuroretinal Rim Area Measurements Made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Neuroretinal Rim Area Measurements Made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II
title_short Comparison of Neuroretinal Rim Area Measurements Made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II
title_sort comparison of neuroretinal rim area measurements made by the heidelberg retina tomograph i and the heidelberg retina tomograph ii
topic Original Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22576170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318255da30
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyaxing comparisonofneuroretinalrimareameasurementsmadebytheheidelbergretinatomographiandtheheidelbergretinatomographii
AT olearyneil comparisonofneuroretinalrimareameasurementsmadebytheheidelbergretinatomographiandtheheidelbergretinatomographii
AT strouthidisnicholasg comparisonofneuroretinalrimareameasurementsmadebytheheidelbergretinatomographiandtheheidelbergretinatomographii
AT whiteedwardt comparisonofneuroretinalrimareameasurementsmadebytheheidelbergretinatomographiandtheheidelbergretinatomographii
AT hotuana comparisonofneuroretinalrimareameasurementsmadebytheheidelbergretinatomographiandtheheidelbergretinatomographii
AT garwayheathdavidf comparisonofneuroretinalrimareameasurementsmadebytheheidelbergretinatomographiandtheheidelbergretinatomographii