Cargando…

Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors: The French Multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study

OBJECTIVES: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) has been used in single-center studies to evaluate tumor response to antiangiogenic treatments: the change of area under the perfusion curve (AUC), a criterion linked to blood volume, was consistently correlated with the Response Evaluation C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lassau, Nathalie, Bonastre, Julia, Kind, Michèle, Vilgrain, Valérie, Lacroix, Joëlle, Cuinet, Marie, Taieb, Sophie, Aziza, Richard, Sarran, Antony, Labbe-Devilliers, Catherine, Gallix, Benoit, Lucidarme, Olivier, Ptak, Yvette, Rocher, Laurence, Caquot, Louis-Michel, Chagnon, Sophie, Marion, Denis, Luciani, Alain, Feutray, Sylvaine, Uzan-Augui, Joëlle, Coiffier, Benedicte, Benastou, Baya, Koscielny, Serge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24991866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000085
_version_ 1782343106225504256
author Lassau, Nathalie
Bonastre, Julia
Kind, Michèle
Vilgrain, Valérie
Lacroix, Joëlle
Cuinet, Marie
Taieb, Sophie
Aziza, Richard
Sarran, Antony
Labbe-Devilliers, Catherine
Gallix, Benoit
Lucidarme, Olivier
Ptak, Yvette
Rocher, Laurence
Caquot, Louis-Michel
Chagnon, Sophie
Marion, Denis
Luciani, Alain
Feutray, Sylvaine
Uzan-Augui, Joëlle
Coiffier, Benedicte
Benastou, Baya
Koscielny, Serge
author_facet Lassau, Nathalie
Bonastre, Julia
Kind, Michèle
Vilgrain, Valérie
Lacroix, Joëlle
Cuinet, Marie
Taieb, Sophie
Aziza, Richard
Sarran, Antony
Labbe-Devilliers, Catherine
Gallix, Benoit
Lucidarme, Olivier
Ptak, Yvette
Rocher, Laurence
Caquot, Louis-Michel
Chagnon, Sophie
Marion, Denis
Luciani, Alain
Feutray, Sylvaine
Uzan-Augui, Joëlle
Coiffier, Benedicte
Benastou, Baya
Koscielny, Serge
author_sort Lassau, Nathalie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) has been used in single-center studies to evaluate tumor response to antiangiogenic treatments: the change of area under the perfusion curve (AUC), a criterion linked to blood volume, was consistently correlated with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. The main objective here was to do a multicentric validation of the use of DCE-US to evaluate tumor response in different solid tumor types treated by several antiangiogenic agents. A secondary objective was to evaluate the costs of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included patients from 2007 to 2010 in 19 centers (8 teaching hospitals and 11 comprehensive cancer centers). All patients treated with antiangiogenic therapy were eligible. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound examinations were performed at baseline as well as on days 7, 15, 30, and 60. For each examination, a perfusion curve was recorded during 3 minutes after injection of a contrast agent. Change from baseline at each time point was estimated for each of 7 fitted criteria. The main end point was freedom from progression (FFP). Criterion/time-point combinations with the strongest correlation with FFP were analyzed further to estimate an optimal cutoff point. RESULTS: A total of 1968 DCE-US examinations in 539 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 1.65 years. Variations from baseline were significant at day 30 for several criteria, with AUC having the most significant association with FFP (P = 0.00002). Patients with a greater than 40% decrease in AUC at day 30 had better FFP (P = 0.005) and overall survival (P = 0.05). The mean cost of each DCE-US was 180€, which corresponds to $250 using the current exchange rate. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a new functional imaging technique that provides a validated criterion, namely, the change of AUC from baseline to day 30, which is predictive of tumor progression in a large multicenter cohort. Because of its low cost, it should be considered in the routine evaluation of solid tumors treated with antiangiogenic therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4222794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42227942014-11-07 Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors: The French Multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study Lassau, Nathalie Bonastre, Julia Kind, Michèle Vilgrain, Valérie Lacroix, Joëlle Cuinet, Marie Taieb, Sophie Aziza, Richard Sarran, Antony Labbe-Devilliers, Catherine Gallix, Benoit Lucidarme, Olivier Ptak, Yvette Rocher, Laurence Caquot, Louis-Michel Chagnon, Sophie Marion, Denis Luciani, Alain Feutray, Sylvaine Uzan-Augui, Joëlle Coiffier, Benedicte Benastou, Baya Koscielny, Serge Invest Radiol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) has been used in single-center studies to evaluate tumor response to antiangiogenic treatments: the change of area under the perfusion curve (AUC), a criterion linked to blood volume, was consistently correlated with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. The main objective here was to do a multicentric validation of the use of DCE-US to evaluate tumor response in different solid tumor types treated by several antiangiogenic agents. A secondary objective was to evaluate the costs of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included patients from 2007 to 2010 in 19 centers (8 teaching hospitals and 11 comprehensive cancer centers). All patients treated with antiangiogenic therapy were eligible. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound examinations were performed at baseline as well as on days 7, 15, 30, and 60. For each examination, a perfusion curve was recorded during 3 minutes after injection of a contrast agent. Change from baseline at each time point was estimated for each of 7 fitted criteria. The main end point was freedom from progression (FFP). Criterion/time-point combinations with the strongest correlation with FFP were analyzed further to estimate an optimal cutoff point. RESULTS: A total of 1968 DCE-US examinations in 539 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 1.65 years. Variations from baseline were significant at day 30 for several criteria, with AUC having the most significant association with FFP (P = 0.00002). Patients with a greater than 40% decrease in AUC at day 30 had better FFP (P = 0.005) and overall survival (P = 0.05). The mean cost of each DCE-US was 180€, which corresponds to $250 using the current exchange rate. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a new functional imaging technique that provides a validated criterion, namely, the change of AUC from baseline to day 30, which is predictive of tumor progression in a large multicenter cohort. Because of its low cost, it should be considered in the routine evaluation of solid tumors treated with antiangiogenic therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014-12 2014-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4222794/ /pubmed/24991866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000085 Text en Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lassau, Nathalie
Bonastre, Julia
Kind, Michèle
Vilgrain, Valérie
Lacroix, Joëlle
Cuinet, Marie
Taieb, Sophie
Aziza, Richard
Sarran, Antony
Labbe-Devilliers, Catherine
Gallix, Benoit
Lucidarme, Olivier
Ptak, Yvette
Rocher, Laurence
Caquot, Louis-Michel
Chagnon, Sophie
Marion, Denis
Luciani, Alain
Feutray, Sylvaine
Uzan-Augui, Joëlle
Coiffier, Benedicte
Benastou, Baya
Koscielny, Serge
Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors: The French Multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study
title Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors: The French Multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study
title_full Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors: The French Multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study
title_fullStr Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors: The French Multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors: The French Multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study
title_short Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors: The French Multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study
title_sort validation of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting outcomes of antiangiogenic therapy for solid tumors: the french multicenter support for innovative and expensive techniques study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24991866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000085
work_keys_str_mv AT lassaunathalie validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT bonastrejulia validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT kindmichele validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT vilgrainvalerie validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT lacroixjoelle validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT cuinetmarie validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT taiebsophie validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT azizarichard validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT sarranantony validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT labbedevillierscatherine validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT gallixbenoit validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT lucidarmeolivier validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT ptakyvette validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT rocherlaurence validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT caquotlouismichel validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT chagnonsophie validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT mariondenis validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT lucianialain validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT feutraysylvaine validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT uzanauguijoelle validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT coiffierbenedicte validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT benastoubaya validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy
AT koscielnyserge validationofdynamiccontrastenhancedultrasoundinpredictingoutcomesofantiangiogenictherapyforsolidtumorsthefrenchmulticentersupportforinnovativeandexpensivetechniquesstudy