Cargando…

Analytical Interference in Serum Iron Determination Reveals Iron Versus Gadolinium Transmetallation With Linear Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the risk for analytical interference with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for the colorimetric measurement of serum iron (Fe(3+)) and to investigate the mechanisms involved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rat serum was spiked with several conc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fretellier, Nathalie, Poteau, Nathalie, Factor, Cécile, Mayer, Jean-François, Medina, Christelle, Port, Marc, Idée, Jean-Marc, Corot, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24943092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000081
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the risk for analytical interference with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for the colorimetric measurement of serum iron (Fe(3+)) and to investigate the mechanisms involved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rat serum was spiked with several concentrations of all molecular categories of GBCAs, ligands, or “free” soluble gadolinium (Gd(3+)). Serum iron concentration was determined by 2 different colorimetric methods at pH 4.0 (with a Vitros DT60 analyzer or a Cobas Integra 400 analyzer). Secondly, the cause of interference was investigated by (a) adding free soluble Gd(3+) or Mn(2+) to serum in the presence of gadobenic acid or gadodiamide and (b) electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Spurious decrease in serum Fe(3+) concentration was observed with all linear GBCAs (only with the Vitros DT60 technique occurring at pH 4.0) but not with macrocyclic GBCAs or with free soluble Gd(3+). Spurious hyposideremia was also observed with the free ligands present in the pharmaceutical solutions of the linear GBCAs gadopentetic acid and gadodiamide (ie, diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid and calcium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid bismethylamide, respectively), suggesting the formation of Fe-ligand chelate. Gadobenic acid-induced interference was blocked in a concentration-dependent fashion by adding a free soluble Gd(3+) salt. Conversely, Mn(2+), which has a lower affinity than Gd(3+) and Fe(3+) for the ligand of gadobenic acid (ie, benzyloxypropionic diethylenetriamine tetraacetic acid), was less effective (interference was only partially blocked), suggesting an Fe(3+) versus Gd(3+) transmetallation phenomenon at pH 4.0. Similar results were observed with gadodiamide. Mass spectrometry detected the formation of Fe-ligand with all linear GBCAs tested in the presence of Fe(3+) and the disappearance of Fe-ligand after the addition of free soluble Gd(3+). No Fe-ligand chelate was found in the case of the macrocyclic GBCA gadoteric acid. CONCLUSIONS: Macrocyclic GBCAs induced no interference with colorimetric methods for iron determination, whereas negative interference was observed with linear GBCAs using a Vitros DT60 analyzer. This interference of linear GBCAs seems to be caused by the excess of ligand and/or an Fe(3+) versus Gd(3+) transmetallation phenomenon.