Cargando…

Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations

Gross Primary Production (GPP) is the largest flux in the global carbon cycle. However, large uncertainties in current global estimations persist. In this study, we examined the performance of a process-based model (Integrated BIosphere Simulator, IBIS) at 62 eddy covariance sites around the world....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Dan, Cai, Wenwen, Xia, Jiangzhou, Dong, Wenjie, Zhou, Guangsheng, Chen, Yang, Zhang, Haicheng, Yuan, Wenping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25375227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110407
_version_ 1782343113387278336
author Liu, Dan
Cai, Wenwen
Xia, Jiangzhou
Dong, Wenjie
Zhou, Guangsheng
Chen, Yang
Zhang, Haicheng
Yuan, Wenping
author_facet Liu, Dan
Cai, Wenwen
Xia, Jiangzhou
Dong, Wenjie
Zhou, Guangsheng
Chen, Yang
Zhang, Haicheng
Yuan, Wenping
author_sort Liu, Dan
collection PubMed
description Gross Primary Production (GPP) is the largest flux in the global carbon cycle. However, large uncertainties in current global estimations persist. In this study, we examined the performance of a process-based model (Integrated BIosphere Simulator, IBIS) at 62 eddy covariance sites around the world. Our results indicated that the IBIS model explained 60% of the observed variation in daily GPP at all validation sites. Comparison with a satellite-based vegetation model (Eddy Covariance-Light Use Efficiency, EC-LUE) revealed that the IBIS simulations yielded comparable GPP results as the EC-LUE model. Global mean GPP estimated by the IBIS model was 107.50±1.37 Pg C year(−1) (mean value ± standard deviation) across the vegetated area for the period 2000–2006, consistent with the results of the EC-LUE model (109.39±1.48 Pg C year(−1)). To evaluate the uncertainty introduced by the parameter V(cmax), which represents the maximum photosynthetic capacity, we inversed V(cmax) using Markov Chain-Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedures. Using the inversed V(cmax) values, the simulated global GPP increased by 16.5 Pg C year(−1), indicating that IBIS model is sensitive to V(cmax), and large uncertainty exists in model parameterization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4222824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42228242014-11-13 Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations Liu, Dan Cai, Wenwen Xia, Jiangzhou Dong, Wenjie Zhou, Guangsheng Chen, Yang Zhang, Haicheng Yuan, Wenping PLoS One Research Article Gross Primary Production (GPP) is the largest flux in the global carbon cycle. However, large uncertainties in current global estimations persist. In this study, we examined the performance of a process-based model (Integrated BIosphere Simulator, IBIS) at 62 eddy covariance sites around the world. Our results indicated that the IBIS model explained 60% of the observed variation in daily GPP at all validation sites. Comparison with a satellite-based vegetation model (Eddy Covariance-Light Use Efficiency, EC-LUE) revealed that the IBIS simulations yielded comparable GPP results as the EC-LUE model. Global mean GPP estimated by the IBIS model was 107.50±1.37 Pg C year(−1) (mean value ± standard deviation) across the vegetated area for the period 2000–2006, consistent with the results of the EC-LUE model (109.39±1.48 Pg C year(−1)). To evaluate the uncertainty introduced by the parameter V(cmax), which represents the maximum photosynthetic capacity, we inversed V(cmax) using Markov Chain-Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedures. Using the inversed V(cmax) values, the simulated global GPP increased by 16.5 Pg C year(−1), indicating that IBIS model is sensitive to V(cmax), and large uncertainty exists in model parameterization. Public Library of Science 2014-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4222824/ /pubmed/25375227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110407 Text en © 2014 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Dan
Cai, Wenwen
Xia, Jiangzhou
Dong, Wenjie
Zhou, Guangsheng
Chen, Yang
Zhang, Haicheng
Yuan, Wenping
Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations
title Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations
title_full Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations
title_fullStr Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations
title_full_unstemmed Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations
title_short Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations
title_sort global validation of a process-based model on vegetation gross primary production using eddy covariance observations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25375227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110407
work_keys_str_mv AT liudan globalvalidationofaprocessbasedmodelonvegetationgrossprimaryproductionusingeddycovarianceobservations
AT caiwenwen globalvalidationofaprocessbasedmodelonvegetationgrossprimaryproductionusingeddycovarianceobservations
AT xiajiangzhou globalvalidationofaprocessbasedmodelonvegetationgrossprimaryproductionusingeddycovarianceobservations
AT dongwenjie globalvalidationofaprocessbasedmodelonvegetationgrossprimaryproductionusingeddycovarianceobservations
AT zhouguangsheng globalvalidationofaprocessbasedmodelonvegetationgrossprimaryproductionusingeddycovarianceobservations
AT chenyang globalvalidationofaprocessbasedmodelonvegetationgrossprimaryproductionusingeddycovarianceobservations
AT zhanghaicheng globalvalidationofaprocessbasedmodelonvegetationgrossprimaryproductionusingeddycovarianceobservations
AT yuanwenping globalvalidationofaprocessbasedmodelonvegetationgrossprimaryproductionusingeddycovarianceobservations