Cargando…

Voluntary Modulation of Anterior Cingulate Response to Negative Feedback

Anterior cingulate and medial frontal cortex (dACC/mFC) response to negative feedback represents the actions of a generalized error-monitoring system critical for the management of goal-directed behavior. Magnitude of dACC/mFC response to negative feedback correlates with levels of post-feedback beh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shane, Matthew S., Weywadt, Christina R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107322
_version_ 1782343120275374080
author Shane, Matthew S.
Weywadt, Christina R.
author_facet Shane, Matthew S.
Weywadt, Christina R.
author_sort Shane, Matthew S.
collection PubMed
description Anterior cingulate and medial frontal cortex (dACC/mFC) response to negative feedback represents the actions of a generalized error-monitoring system critical for the management of goal-directed behavior. Magnitude of dACC/mFC response to negative feedback correlates with levels of post-feedback behavioral change, and with proficiency of operant learning processes. With this in mind, it follows that an ability to alter dACC/mFC response to negative feedback may lead to representative changes in operant learning proficiency. To this end, the present study investigated the extent to which healthy individuals would show modulation of their dACC/mFC response when instructed to try to either maximize or minimize their neural response to the presentation of contingent negative feedback. Participants performed multiple runs of a standard time-estimation task, during which they received feedback regarding their ability to accurately estimate a one-second duration. On Watch runs, participants were simply instructed to try to estimate as closely as possible the one second duration. On Increase and Decrease runs, participants performed the same task, but were instructed to “try to increase [decrease] their brain's response every time they received negative feedback”. Results indicated that participants showed changes in dACC/mFC response under these differing instructional conditions: dACC/mFC activity following negative feedback was higher in the Increase condition, and dACC activity trended lower in the Decrease condition, compared to the Watch condition. Moreover, dACC activity correlated with post-feedback performance adjustments, and these adjustments were highest in the Increase condition. Potential implications for neuromodulation and facilitated learning are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4222862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42228622014-11-13 Voluntary Modulation of Anterior Cingulate Response to Negative Feedback Shane, Matthew S. Weywadt, Christina R. PLoS One Research Article Anterior cingulate and medial frontal cortex (dACC/mFC) response to negative feedback represents the actions of a generalized error-monitoring system critical for the management of goal-directed behavior. Magnitude of dACC/mFC response to negative feedback correlates with levels of post-feedback behavioral change, and with proficiency of operant learning processes. With this in mind, it follows that an ability to alter dACC/mFC response to negative feedback may lead to representative changes in operant learning proficiency. To this end, the present study investigated the extent to which healthy individuals would show modulation of their dACC/mFC response when instructed to try to either maximize or minimize their neural response to the presentation of contingent negative feedback. Participants performed multiple runs of a standard time-estimation task, during which they received feedback regarding their ability to accurately estimate a one-second duration. On Watch runs, participants were simply instructed to try to estimate as closely as possible the one second duration. On Increase and Decrease runs, participants performed the same task, but were instructed to “try to increase [decrease] their brain's response every time they received negative feedback”. Results indicated that participants showed changes in dACC/mFC response under these differing instructional conditions: dACC/mFC activity following negative feedback was higher in the Increase condition, and dACC activity trended lower in the Decrease condition, compared to the Watch condition. Moreover, dACC activity correlated with post-feedback performance adjustments, and these adjustments were highest in the Increase condition. Potential implications for neuromodulation and facilitated learning are discussed. Public Library of Science 2014-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4222862/ /pubmed/25376010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107322 Text en © 2014 Shane, Weywadt http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shane, Matthew S.
Weywadt, Christina R.
Voluntary Modulation of Anterior Cingulate Response to Negative Feedback
title Voluntary Modulation of Anterior Cingulate Response to Negative Feedback
title_full Voluntary Modulation of Anterior Cingulate Response to Negative Feedback
title_fullStr Voluntary Modulation of Anterior Cingulate Response to Negative Feedback
title_full_unstemmed Voluntary Modulation of Anterior Cingulate Response to Negative Feedback
title_short Voluntary Modulation of Anterior Cingulate Response to Negative Feedback
title_sort voluntary modulation of anterior cingulate response to negative feedback
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107322
work_keys_str_mv AT shanematthews voluntarymodulationofanteriorcingulateresponsetonegativefeedback
AT weywadtchristinar voluntarymodulationofanteriorcingulateresponsetonegativefeedback