Cargando…

Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey

INTRODUCTION: Stoma construction is a life saver method for emergent and elective operations in colorectal surgery. However, they are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. AIM: To compare the operative findings, early postoperative complications, and costs of stapled and hand-sewn c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dinc, Bulent, Ay, Nurettin, Ciyiltepe, Huseyin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25396004
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2014.46165
_version_ 1782343168120848384
author Dinc, Bulent
Ay, Nurettin
Ciyiltepe, Huseyin
author_facet Dinc, Bulent
Ay, Nurettin
Ciyiltepe, Huseyin
author_sort Dinc, Bulent
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Stoma construction is a life saver method for emergent and elective operations in colorectal surgery. However, they are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. AIM: To compare the operative findings, early postoperative complications, and costs of stapled and hand-sewn closures in loop ileostomies that are constructed in emergent and elective colorectal surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 68 patients requiring loop ileostomies during colorectal surgery were retrospectively evaluated. SPSS (version 20) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 44 men and 24 women with a mean age of 55.5 years. The ileostomy closures were performed with hand-sewn method in 36 patients (group 1) and stapled method in 32 patients (group 2). The mean operation time was 75.4 min in group 1 and 46.7 min in group 2 (p < 0.001). Early postoperative complications were wound infection (8.8%), small bowel obstruction (6.06%), and anastomotic leakage (2.9%). Total costs, flatulence and faeces outlet time, oral feeding starting time, time of hospital stay, and early postoperative complications were lower in the stapled group. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality rates of stoma construction and its closure are still considerable. Lower anastomotic leakage rate, complication rate, and costs and shorter operative times in the stapled group make this method preferable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4223118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42231182014-11-13 Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey Dinc, Bulent Ay, Nurettin Ciyiltepe, Huseyin Prz Gastroenterol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Stoma construction is a life saver method for emergent and elective operations in colorectal surgery. However, they are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. AIM: To compare the operative findings, early postoperative complications, and costs of stapled and hand-sewn closures in loop ileostomies that are constructed in emergent and elective colorectal surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 68 patients requiring loop ileostomies during colorectal surgery were retrospectively evaluated. SPSS (version 20) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 44 men and 24 women with a mean age of 55.5 years. The ileostomy closures were performed with hand-sewn method in 36 patients (group 1) and stapled method in 32 patients (group 2). The mean operation time was 75.4 min in group 1 and 46.7 min in group 2 (p < 0.001). Early postoperative complications were wound infection (8.8%), small bowel obstruction (6.06%), and anastomotic leakage (2.9%). Total costs, flatulence and faeces outlet time, oral feeding starting time, time of hospital stay, and early postoperative complications were lower in the stapled group. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality rates of stoma construction and its closure are still considerable. Lower anastomotic leakage rate, complication rate, and costs and shorter operative times in the stapled group make this method preferable. Termedia Publishing House 2014-10-19 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4223118/ /pubmed/25396004 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2014.46165 Text en Copyright © 2014 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Dinc, Bulent
Ay, Nurettin
Ciyiltepe, Huseyin
Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey
title Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey
title_full Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey
title_fullStr Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey
title_short Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey
title_sort comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in turkey
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25396004
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2014.46165
work_keys_str_mv AT dincbulent comparingmethodsofileostomyclosureconstructedincolorectalsurgeryinturkey
AT aynurettin comparingmethodsofileostomyclosureconstructedincolorectalsurgeryinturkey
AT ciyiltepehuseyin comparingmethodsofileostomyclosureconstructedincolorectalsurgeryinturkey