Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing
BACKGROUND: Since patients diagnosed with BRAF V600E and V600K mutated advanced melanoma show response to treatment with MAP kinase inhibitors, several sensitive methods have been developed to determine the V600 allele status of melanoma patients. Vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and dabrafenib (Tafinlar) are...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-519 |
_version_ | 1782343246085619712 |
---|---|
author | Marchant, Julie Mange, Alain Larrieux, Marion Costes, Valérie Solassol, Jérôme |
author_facet | Marchant, Julie Mange, Alain Larrieux, Marion Costes, Valérie Solassol, Jérôme |
author_sort | Marchant, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Since patients diagnosed with BRAF V600E and V600K mutated advanced melanoma show response to treatment with MAP kinase inhibitors, several sensitive methods have been developed to determine the V600 allele status of melanoma patients. Vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and dabrafenib (Tafinlar) are specific BRAF V600 inhibitors recently approved by the US FDA as single agent treatments for unresectable or metastatic melanoma in patients with the BRAF V600 mutation. METHODS: We assessed the new CE THxID™-BRAF diagnostic test, which is also FDA-approved as a companion diagnostic test in the US under a specific reference and compared the results of this assay with both High Resolution Melting (HRM) and Sanger sequencing in 113 melanoma FFPE samples. RESULTS: Invalid results were observed in 0/113 specimen with HRM, 5/113 (4.4%) with Sanger sequencing, and 1/113 (0.9%) with the THxID™-BRAF test. Positive percentage agreement (PPA) was 93.5% (95% CI 82.5 - 97.8) for V600E and V600K mutations combined for the THxID™-BRAF test and HRM, and negative percentage agreement (NPA) was 100.0% (95% CI 94.5 - 100.0). For the THxID™-BRAF test and Sanger, PPA was 100.0% (95% CI 92.1 - 100.0) and NPA 100.0% (95% CI 94.2 - 100.0). One V600E sample identified by THxID™-BRAF test was detected as wild-type by HRM and uninterpretable by Sanger. All V600K (n = 3) were detected using the 3 different approaches. Finally, percent agreement values were not significantly different when using punches (n = 77) vs. slides (n = 36) or depending on samples characteristics such as pigmentation, necrosis, and tumor content. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the high agreement between the FDA approved THxID™-BRAF assay, HRM, and Sanger sequencing. It has also highlighted the potential of THxID™-BRAF to be applied to a broader range of sample types than claimed in the current “instructions for use”, an extension that would require the ad hoc validation and approval. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4223712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42237122014-11-08 Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing Marchant, Julie Mange, Alain Larrieux, Marion Costes, Valérie Solassol, Jérôme BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Since patients diagnosed with BRAF V600E and V600K mutated advanced melanoma show response to treatment with MAP kinase inhibitors, several sensitive methods have been developed to determine the V600 allele status of melanoma patients. Vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and dabrafenib (Tafinlar) are specific BRAF V600 inhibitors recently approved by the US FDA as single agent treatments for unresectable or metastatic melanoma in patients with the BRAF V600 mutation. METHODS: We assessed the new CE THxID™-BRAF diagnostic test, which is also FDA-approved as a companion diagnostic test in the US under a specific reference and compared the results of this assay with both High Resolution Melting (HRM) and Sanger sequencing in 113 melanoma FFPE samples. RESULTS: Invalid results were observed in 0/113 specimen with HRM, 5/113 (4.4%) with Sanger sequencing, and 1/113 (0.9%) with the THxID™-BRAF test. Positive percentage agreement (PPA) was 93.5% (95% CI 82.5 - 97.8) for V600E and V600K mutations combined for the THxID™-BRAF test and HRM, and negative percentage agreement (NPA) was 100.0% (95% CI 94.5 - 100.0). For the THxID™-BRAF test and Sanger, PPA was 100.0% (95% CI 92.1 - 100.0) and NPA 100.0% (95% CI 94.2 - 100.0). One V600E sample identified by THxID™-BRAF test was detected as wild-type by HRM and uninterpretable by Sanger. All V600K (n = 3) were detected using the 3 different approaches. Finally, percent agreement values were not significantly different when using punches (n = 77) vs. slides (n = 36) or depending on samples characteristics such as pigmentation, necrosis, and tumor content. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the high agreement between the FDA approved THxID™-BRAF assay, HRM, and Sanger sequencing. It has also highlighted the potential of THxID™-BRAF to be applied to a broader range of sample types than claimed in the current “instructions for use”, an extension that would require the ad hoc validation and approval. BioMed Central 2014-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4223712/ /pubmed/25037456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-519 Text en Copyright © 2014 Marchant et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Marchant, Julie Mange, Alain Larrieux, Marion Costes, Valérie Solassol, Jérôme Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing |
title | Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of the new fda approved thxid™-braf test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marchantjulie comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing AT mangealain comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing AT larrieuxmarion comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing AT costesvalerie comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing AT solassoljerome comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing |