Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing

BACKGROUND: Since patients diagnosed with BRAF V600E and V600K mutated advanced melanoma show response to treatment with MAP kinase inhibitors, several sensitive methods have been developed to determine the V600 allele status of melanoma patients. Vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and dabrafenib (Tafinlar) are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marchant, Julie, Mange, Alain, Larrieux, Marion, Costes, Valérie, Solassol, Jérôme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-519
_version_ 1782343246085619712
author Marchant, Julie
Mange, Alain
Larrieux, Marion
Costes, Valérie
Solassol, Jérôme
author_facet Marchant, Julie
Mange, Alain
Larrieux, Marion
Costes, Valérie
Solassol, Jérôme
author_sort Marchant, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since patients diagnosed with BRAF V600E and V600K mutated advanced melanoma show response to treatment with MAP kinase inhibitors, several sensitive methods have been developed to determine the V600 allele status of melanoma patients. Vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and dabrafenib (Tafinlar) are specific BRAF V600 inhibitors recently approved by the US FDA as single agent treatments for unresectable or metastatic melanoma in patients with the BRAF V600 mutation. METHODS: We assessed the new CE THxID™-BRAF diagnostic test, which is also FDA-approved as a companion diagnostic test in the US under a specific reference and compared the results of this assay with both High Resolution Melting (HRM) and Sanger sequencing in 113 melanoma FFPE samples. RESULTS: Invalid results were observed in 0/113 specimen with HRM, 5/113 (4.4%) with Sanger sequencing, and 1/113 (0.9%) with the THxID™-BRAF test. Positive percentage agreement (PPA) was 93.5% (95% CI 82.5 - 97.8) for V600E and V600K mutations combined for the THxID™-BRAF test and HRM, and negative percentage agreement (NPA) was 100.0% (95% CI 94.5 - 100.0). For the THxID™-BRAF test and Sanger, PPA was 100.0% (95% CI 92.1 - 100.0) and NPA 100.0% (95% CI 94.2 - 100.0). One V600E sample identified by THxID™-BRAF test was detected as wild-type by HRM and uninterpretable by Sanger. All V600K (n = 3) were detected using the 3 different approaches. Finally, percent agreement values were not significantly different when using punches (n = 77) vs. slides (n = 36) or depending on samples characteristics such as pigmentation, necrosis, and tumor content. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the high agreement between the FDA approved THxID™-BRAF assay, HRM, and Sanger sequencing. It has also highlighted the potential of THxID™-BRAF to be applied to a broader range of sample types than claimed in the current “instructions for use”, an extension that would require the ad hoc validation and approval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4223712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42237122014-11-08 Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing Marchant, Julie Mange, Alain Larrieux, Marion Costes, Valérie Solassol, Jérôme BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Since patients diagnosed with BRAF V600E and V600K mutated advanced melanoma show response to treatment with MAP kinase inhibitors, several sensitive methods have been developed to determine the V600 allele status of melanoma patients. Vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and dabrafenib (Tafinlar) are specific BRAF V600 inhibitors recently approved by the US FDA as single agent treatments for unresectable or metastatic melanoma in patients with the BRAF V600 mutation. METHODS: We assessed the new CE THxID™-BRAF diagnostic test, which is also FDA-approved as a companion diagnostic test in the US under a specific reference and compared the results of this assay with both High Resolution Melting (HRM) and Sanger sequencing in 113 melanoma FFPE samples. RESULTS: Invalid results were observed in 0/113 specimen with HRM, 5/113 (4.4%) with Sanger sequencing, and 1/113 (0.9%) with the THxID™-BRAF test. Positive percentage agreement (PPA) was 93.5% (95% CI 82.5 - 97.8) for V600E and V600K mutations combined for the THxID™-BRAF test and HRM, and negative percentage agreement (NPA) was 100.0% (95% CI 94.5 - 100.0). For the THxID™-BRAF test and Sanger, PPA was 100.0% (95% CI 92.1 - 100.0) and NPA 100.0% (95% CI 94.2 - 100.0). One V600E sample identified by THxID™-BRAF test was detected as wild-type by HRM and uninterpretable by Sanger. All V600K (n = 3) were detected using the 3 different approaches. Finally, percent agreement values were not significantly different when using punches (n = 77) vs. slides (n = 36) or depending on samples characteristics such as pigmentation, necrosis, and tumor content. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the high agreement between the FDA approved THxID™-BRAF assay, HRM, and Sanger sequencing. It has also highlighted the potential of THxID™-BRAF to be applied to a broader range of sample types than claimed in the current “instructions for use”, an extension that would require the ad hoc validation and approval. BioMed Central 2014-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4223712/ /pubmed/25037456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-519 Text en Copyright © 2014 Marchant et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Marchant, Julie
Mange, Alain
Larrieux, Marion
Costes, Valérie
Solassol, Jérôme
Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing
title Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing
title_full Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing
title_short Comparative evaluation of the new FDA approved THxID™-BRAF test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing
title_sort comparative evaluation of the new fda approved thxid™-braf test with high resolution melting and sanger sequencing
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-519
work_keys_str_mv AT marchantjulie comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing
AT mangealain comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing
AT larrieuxmarion comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing
AT costesvalerie comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing
AT solassoljerome comparativeevaluationofthenewfdaapprovedthxidbraftestwithhighresolutionmeltingandsangersequencing