Cargando…

Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process

BACKGROUND: Endophytic bacteria benefit host plant directly or indirectly, e.g. by biocontrol of the pathogens. Up to now, their interactions with the host and with other microorganisms are poorly understood. Consequently, a crucial step for improving the knowledge of those relationships is to deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bulgari, Daniela, Casati, Paola, Quaglino, Fabio, Bianco, Piero A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25048741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-14-198
_version_ 1782343257206816768
author Bulgari, Daniela
Casati, Paola
Quaglino, Fabio
Bianco, Piero A
author_facet Bulgari, Daniela
Casati, Paola
Quaglino, Fabio
Bianco, Piero A
author_sort Bulgari, Daniela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endophytic bacteria benefit host plant directly or indirectly, e.g. by biocontrol of the pathogens. Up to now, their interactions with the host and with other microorganisms are poorly understood. Consequently, a crucial step for improving the knowledge of those relationships is to determine if pathogens or plant growing season influence endophytic bacterial diversity and dynamic. RESULTS: Four healthy, four phytoplasma diseased and four recovered (symptomatic plants that spontaneously regain a healthy condition) grapevine plants were sampled monthly from June to October 2010 in a vineyard in north-western Italy. Metagenomic DNA was extracted from sterilized leaves and the endophytic bacterial community dynamic and diversity were analyzed by taxon specific real-time PCR, Length-Heterogeneity PCR and genus-specific PCR. These analyses revealed that both sampling date and phytoplasma infection influenced the endophytic bacterial composition. Interestingly, in June, when the plants are symptomless and the pathogen is undetectable (i) the endophytic bacterial community associated with diseased grapevines was different from those in the other sampling dates, when the phytoplasmas are detectable inside samples; (ii) the microbial community associated with recovered plants differs from that living inside healthy and diseased plants. Interestingly, LH-PCR database identified bacteria previously reported as biocontrol agents in the examined grapevines. Of these, Burkholderia, Methylobacterium and Pantoea dynamic was influenced by the phytoplasma infection process and seasonality. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that endophytic bacterial community composition in grapevine is correlated to both phytoplasma infection and sampling date. For the first time, data underlined that, in diseased plants, the pathogen infection process can decrease the impact of seasonality on community dynamic. Moreover, based on experimental evidences, it was reasonable to hypothesize that after recovery the restructured microbial community could maintain the main structure between seasons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4223760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42237602014-11-08 Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process Bulgari, Daniela Casati, Paola Quaglino, Fabio Bianco, Piero A BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Endophytic bacteria benefit host plant directly or indirectly, e.g. by biocontrol of the pathogens. Up to now, their interactions with the host and with other microorganisms are poorly understood. Consequently, a crucial step for improving the knowledge of those relationships is to determine if pathogens or plant growing season influence endophytic bacterial diversity and dynamic. RESULTS: Four healthy, four phytoplasma diseased and four recovered (symptomatic plants that spontaneously regain a healthy condition) grapevine plants were sampled monthly from June to October 2010 in a vineyard in north-western Italy. Metagenomic DNA was extracted from sterilized leaves and the endophytic bacterial community dynamic and diversity were analyzed by taxon specific real-time PCR, Length-Heterogeneity PCR and genus-specific PCR. These analyses revealed that both sampling date and phytoplasma infection influenced the endophytic bacterial composition. Interestingly, in June, when the plants are symptomless and the pathogen is undetectable (i) the endophytic bacterial community associated with diseased grapevines was different from those in the other sampling dates, when the phytoplasmas are detectable inside samples; (ii) the microbial community associated with recovered plants differs from that living inside healthy and diseased plants. Interestingly, LH-PCR database identified bacteria previously reported as biocontrol agents in the examined grapevines. Of these, Burkholderia, Methylobacterium and Pantoea dynamic was influenced by the phytoplasma infection process and seasonality. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that endophytic bacterial community composition in grapevine is correlated to both phytoplasma infection and sampling date. For the first time, data underlined that, in diseased plants, the pathogen infection process can decrease the impact of seasonality on community dynamic. Moreover, based on experimental evidences, it was reasonable to hypothesize that after recovery the restructured microbial community could maintain the main structure between seasons. BioMed Central 2014-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4223760/ /pubmed/25048741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-14-198 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bulgari et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bulgari, Daniela
Casati, Paola
Quaglino, Fabio
Bianco, Piero A
Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process
title Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process
title_full Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process
title_fullStr Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process
title_full_unstemmed Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process
title_short Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process
title_sort endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25048741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-14-198
work_keys_str_mv AT bulgaridaniela endophyticbacterialcommunityofgrapevineleavesinfluencedbysamplingdateandphytoplasmainfectionprocess
AT casatipaola endophyticbacterialcommunityofgrapevineleavesinfluencedbysamplingdateandphytoplasmainfectionprocess
AT quaglinofabio endophyticbacterialcommunityofgrapevineleavesinfluencedbysamplingdateandphytoplasmainfectionprocess
AT biancopieroa endophyticbacterialcommunityofgrapevineleavesinfluencedbysamplingdateandphytoplasmainfectionprocess