Cargando…

Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought

In the face of water stress, plants evolved with different abilities to limit the decrease in leaf water potential, notably in the daytime (Ψ(M)). So-called isohydric species efficiently maintain high Ψ(M), whereas anisohydric species cannot prevent Ψ(M) from dropping as soil water deficit develops....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coupel-Ledru, Aude, Lebon, Éric, Christophe, Angélique, Doligez, Agnès, Cabrera-Bosquet, Llorenç, Péchier, Philippe, Hamard, Philippe, This, Patrice, Simonneau, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25381432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru228
_version_ 1782343292256518144
author Coupel-Ledru, Aude
Lebon, Éric
Christophe, Angélique
Doligez, Agnès
Cabrera-Bosquet, Llorenç
Péchier, Philippe
Hamard, Philippe
This, Patrice
Simonneau, Thierry
author_facet Coupel-Ledru, Aude
Lebon, Éric
Christophe, Angélique
Doligez, Agnès
Cabrera-Bosquet, Llorenç
Péchier, Philippe
Hamard, Philippe
This, Patrice
Simonneau, Thierry
author_sort Coupel-Ledru, Aude
collection PubMed
description In the face of water stress, plants evolved with different abilities to limit the decrease in leaf water potential, notably in the daytime (Ψ(M)). So-called isohydric species efficiently maintain high Ψ(M), whereas anisohydric species cannot prevent Ψ(M) from dropping as soil water deficit develops. The genetic and physiological origins of these differences in (an)isohydric behaviours remain to be clarified. This is of particular interest within species such as Vitis vinifera L. where continuous variation in the level of isohydry has been observed among cultivars. With this objective, a 2 year experiment was conducted on the pseudo-F(1) progeny from a cross between the two widespread cultivars Syrah and Grenache using a phenotyping platform coupled to a controlled-environment chamber. Potted plants of all the progeny were analysed for Ψ(M), transpiration rate, and soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance, under both well-watered and water deficit conditions. A high genetic variability was found for all the above traits. Four quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were detected for Ψ(M) under water deficit conditions, and 28 other QTLs were detected for the different traits in either condition. Genetic variation in Ψ(M) maintenance under water deficit weakly correlated with drought-induced reduction in transpiration rate in the progeny, and QTLs for both traits did not completely co-localize. This indicates that genetic variation in the control of Ψ(M) under water deficit was not due simply to variation in transpiration sensitivity to soil drying. Possible origins of the diversity in (an)isohydric behaviours in grapevine are discussed on the basis of concurrent variations in soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance and stomatal control of transpiration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4223985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42239852014-11-10 Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought Coupel-Ledru, Aude Lebon, Éric Christophe, Angélique Doligez, Agnès Cabrera-Bosquet, Llorenç Péchier, Philippe Hamard, Philippe This, Patrice Simonneau, Thierry J Exp Bot Research Paper In the face of water stress, plants evolved with different abilities to limit the decrease in leaf water potential, notably in the daytime (Ψ(M)). So-called isohydric species efficiently maintain high Ψ(M), whereas anisohydric species cannot prevent Ψ(M) from dropping as soil water deficit develops. The genetic and physiological origins of these differences in (an)isohydric behaviours remain to be clarified. This is of particular interest within species such as Vitis vinifera L. where continuous variation in the level of isohydry has been observed among cultivars. With this objective, a 2 year experiment was conducted on the pseudo-F(1) progeny from a cross between the two widespread cultivars Syrah and Grenache using a phenotyping platform coupled to a controlled-environment chamber. Potted plants of all the progeny were analysed for Ψ(M), transpiration rate, and soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance, under both well-watered and water deficit conditions. A high genetic variability was found for all the above traits. Four quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were detected for Ψ(M) under water deficit conditions, and 28 other QTLs were detected for the different traits in either condition. Genetic variation in Ψ(M) maintenance under water deficit weakly correlated with drought-induced reduction in transpiration rate in the progeny, and QTLs for both traits did not completely co-localize. This indicates that genetic variation in the control of Ψ(M) under water deficit was not due simply to variation in transpiration sensitivity to soil drying. Possible origins of the diversity in (an)isohydric behaviours in grapevine are discussed on the basis of concurrent variations in soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance and stomatal control of transpiration. Oxford University Press 2014-11 2014-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4223985/ /pubmed/25381432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru228 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Coupel-Ledru, Aude
Lebon, Éric
Christophe, Angélique
Doligez, Agnès
Cabrera-Bosquet, Llorenç
Péchier, Philippe
Hamard, Philippe
This, Patrice
Simonneau, Thierry
Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought
title Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought
title_full Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought
title_fullStr Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought
title_full_unstemmed Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought
title_short Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought
title_sort genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (vitis vinifera l. cvs grenache×syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25381432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru228
work_keys_str_mv AT coupelledruaude geneticvariationinagrapevineprogenyvitisviniferalcvsgrenachesyrahrevealsinconsistenciesbetweenmaintenanceofdaytimeleafwaterpotentialandresponseoftranspirationrateunderdrought
AT leboneric geneticvariationinagrapevineprogenyvitisviniferalcvsgrenachesyrahrevealsinconsistenciesbetweenmaintenanceofdaytimeleafwaterpotentialandresponseoftranspirationrateunderdrought
AT christopheangelique geneticvariationinagrapevineprogenyvitisviniferalcvsgrenachesyrahrevealsinconsistenciesbetweenmaintenanceofdaytimeleafwaterpotentialandresponseoftranspirationrateunderdrought
AT doligezagnes geneticvariationinagrapevineprogenyvitisviniferalcvsgrenachesyrahrevealsinconsistenciesbetweenmaintenanceofdaytimeleafwaterpotentialandresponseoftranspirationrateunderdrought
AT cabrerabosquetllorenc geneticvariationinagrapevineprogenyvitisviniferalcvsgrenachesyrahrevealsinconsistenciesbetweenmaintenanceofdaytimeleafwaterpotentialandresponseoftranspirationrateunderdrought
AT pechierphilippe geneticvariationinagrapevineprogenyvitisviniferalcvsgrenachesyrahrevealsinconsistenciesbetweenmaintenanceofdaytimeleafwaterpotentialandresponseoftranspirationrateunderdrought
AT hamardphilippe geneticvariationinagrapevineprogenyvitisviniferalcvsgrenachesyrahrevealsinconsistenciesbetweenmaintenanceofdaytimeleafwaterpotentialandresponseoftranspirationrateunderdrought
AT thispatrice geneticvariationinagrapevineprogenyvitisviniferalcvsgrenachesyrahrevealsinconsistenciesbetweenmaintenanceofdaytimeleafwaterpotentialandresponseoftranspirationrateunderdrought
AT simonneauthierry geneticvariationinagrapevineprogenyvitisviniferalcvsgrenachesyrahrevealsinconsistenciesbetweenmaintenanceofdaytimeleafwaterpotentialandresponseoftranspirationrateunderdrought