Cargando…

Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects

Schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BP) share significant overlap in clinical symptoms, brain characteristics, and risk genes, and both are associated with dysconnectivity among large-scale brain networks. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data facilitates studying ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rashid, Barnaly, Damaraju, Eswar, Pearlson, Godfrey D., Calhoun, Vince D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00897
_version_ 1782343308182290432
author Rashid, Barnaly
Damaraju, Eswar
Pearlson, Godfrey D.
Calhoun, Vince D.
author_facet Rashid, Barnaly
Damaraju, Eswar
Pearlson, Godfrey D.
Calhoun, Vince D.
author_sort Rashid, Barnaly
collection PubMed
description Schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BP) share significant overlap in clinical symptoms, brain characteristics, and risk genes, and both are associated with dysconnectivity among large-scale brain networks. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data facilitates studying macroscopic connectivity among distant brain regions. Standard approaches to identifying such connectivity include seed-based correlation and data-driven clustering methods such as independent component analysis (ICA) but typically focus on average connectivity. In this study, we utilize ICA on rsfMRI data to obtain intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) in cohorts of healthy controls (HCs) and age matched SZ and BP patients. Subsequently, we investigated difference in functional network connectivity, defined as pairwise correlations among the timecourses of ICNs, between HCs and patients. We quantified differences in both static (average) and dynamic (windowed) connectivity during the entire scan duration. Disease-specific differences were identified in connectivity within different dynamic states. Notably, results suggest that patients make fewer transitions to some states (states 1, 2, and 4) compared to HCs, with most such differences confined to a single state. SZ patients showed more differences from healthy subjects than did bipolars, including both hyper and hypo connectivity in one common connectivity state (dynamic state 3). Also group differences between SZ and bipolar patients were identified in patterns (states) of connectivity involving the frontal (dynamic state 1) and frontal-parietal regions (dynamic state 3). Our results provide new information about these illnesses and strongly suggest that state-based analyses are critical to avoid averaging together important factors that can help distinguish these clinical groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4224100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42241002014-11-25 Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects Rashid, Barnaly Damaraju, Eswar Pearlson, Godfrey D. Calhoun, Vince D. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BP) share significant overlap in clinical symptoms, brain characteristics, and risk genes, and both are associated with dysconnectivity among large-scale brain networks. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data facilitates studying macroscopic connectivity among distant brain regions. Standard approaches to identifying such connectivity include seed-based correlation and data-driven clustering methods such as independent component analysis (ICA) but typically focus on average connectivity. In this study, we utilize ICA on rsfMRI data to obtain intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) in cohorts of healthy controls (HCs) and age matched SZ and BP patients. Subsequently, we investigated difference in functional network connectivity, defined as pairwise correlations among the timecourses of ICNs, between HCs and patients. We quantified differences in both static (average) and dynamic (windowed) connectivity during the entire scan duration. Disease-specific differences were identified in connectivity within different dynamic states. Notably, results suggest that patients make fewer transitions to some states (states 1, 2, and 4) compared to HCs, with most such differences confined to a single state. SZ patients showed more differences from healthy subjects than did bipolars, including both hyper and hypo connectivity in one common connectivity state (dynamic state 3). Also group differences between SZ and bipolar patients were identified in patterns (states) of connectivity involving the frontal (dynamic state 1) and frontal-parietal regions (dynamic state 3). Our results provide new information about these illnesses and strongly suggest that state-based analyses are critical to avoid averaging together important factors that can help distinguish these clinical groups. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4224100/ /pubmed/25426048 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00897 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rashid, Damaraju, Pearlson and Calhoun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Rashid, Barnaly
Damaraju, Eswar
Pearlson, Godfrey D.
Calhoun, Vince D.
Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects
title Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects
title_full Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects
title_fullStr Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects
title_short Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects
title_sort dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fmri identify differences among schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00897
work_keys_str_mv AT rashidbarnaly dynamicconnectivitystatesestimatedfromrestingfmriidentifydifferencesamongschizophreniabipolardisorderandhealthycontrolsubjects
AT damarajueswar dynamicconnectivitystatesestimatedfromrestingfmriidentifydifferencesamongschizophreniabipolardisorderandhealthycontrolsubjects
AT pearlsongodfreyd dynamicconnectivitystatesestimatedfromrestingfmriidentifydifferencesamongschizophreniabipolardisorderandhealthycontrolsubjects
AT calhounvinced dynamicconnectivitystatesestimatedfromrestingfmriidentifydifferencesamongschizophreniabipolardisorderandhealthycontrolsubjects