Cargando…

Comparison of Surface Markers between Human and Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells

This study investigated whether there are marked differences in surface markers between rabbit and human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Murine and rabbit MSCs have been reported to be CD90-negative. Rat MSCs have been reported to be CD71-negative. Our previous study also shows that rabbit MSCs are C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Tao-Chen, Lee, Tsung-Han, Huang, Yu-Hua, Chang, Nyuk-Kong, Lin, Yu-Jun, Chien, Pei-Wen Chang, Yang, Wei-Hsun, Lin, Martin Hsiu-Chu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25380245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111390
_version_ 1782343340134498304
author Lee, Tao-Chen
Lee, Tsung-Han
Huang, Yu-Hua
Chang, Nyuk-Kong
Lin, Yu-Jun
Chien, Pei-Wen Chang
Yang, Wei-Hsun
Lin, Martin Hsiu-Chu
author_facet Lee, Tao-Chen
Lee, Tsung-Han
Huang, Yu-Hua
Chang, Nyuk-Kong
Lin, Yu-Jun
Chien, Pei-Wen Chang
Yang, Wei-Hsun
Lin, Martin Hsiu-Chu
author_sort Lee, Tao-Chen
collection PubMed
description This study investigated whether there are marked differences in surface markers between rabbit and human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Murine and rabbit MSCs have been reported to be CD90-negative. Rat MSCs have been reported to be CD71-negative. Our previous study also shows that rabbit MSCs are CD29-negative. However, human MSCs are generally considered to be CD29-, CD71-, and CD90-positive. Therefore, the surface markers of human MSCs might differ from those of other species. Rabbit bone marrow MSCs were obtained that had a multi-differentiation potential. The phenotype of these cells was studied using flow cytometry antibodies for 25 rabbit surface markers, namely, CD13, CD14, CD29, CD31, CD34, CD44, CD45, CD49d, CD49f, CD51, CD54, CD59, CD71, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD106, CD133, CD166, MHC I, MHC II, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), cytokeratin, desmin, and vimentin. The phenotype of commercially available human MSCs was similarly studied using antibodies for human surface markers. CD14, CD31, CD34, CD45, CD49d, CD49f, CD51, CD54, CD71, CD106, CD133, MHC II, and cytokeratin were absent from both rabbit and human MSCs, while CD44, α-SMA, and vimentin were present on both cell lines. CD13, CD29, CD59, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD166, and MHC I were present on human MSCs, but not on rabbit MSCs. However, desmin was present on rabbit MSCs, but not on human MSCs. In total, the surface expression of nine markers differed between human and rabbit MSCs, whereas the surface expression of 16 markers was the same in the two cell lines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4224397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42243972014-11-18 Comparison of Surface Markers between Human and Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells Lee, Tao-Chen Lee, Tsung-Han Huang, Yu-Hua Chang, Nyuk-Kong Lin, Yu-Jun Chien, Pei-Wen Chang Yang, Wei-Hsun Lin, Martin Hsiu-Chu PLoS One Research Article This study investigated whether there are marked differences in surface markers between rabbit and human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Murine and rabbit MSCs have been reported to be CD90-negative. Rat MSCs have been reported to be CD71-negative. Our previous study also shows that rabbit MSCs are CD29-negative. However, human MSCs are generally considered to be CD29-, CD71-, and CD90-positive. Therefore, the surface markers of human MSCs might differ from those of other species. Rabbit bone marrow MSCs were obtained that had a multi-differentiation potential. The phenotype of these cells was studied using flow cytometry antibodies for 25 rabbit surface markers, namely, CD13, CD14, CD29, CD31, CD34, CD44, CD45, CD49d, CD49f, CD51, CD54, CD59, CD71, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD106, CD133, CD166, MHC I, MHC II, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), cytokeratin, desmin, and vimentin. The phenotype of commercially available human MSCs was similarly studied using antibodies for human surface markers. CD14, CD31, CD34, CD45, CD49d, CD49f, CD51, CD54, CD71, CD106, CD133, MHC II, and cytokeratin were absent from both rabbit and human MSCs, while CD44, α-SMA, and vimentin were present on both cell lines. CD13, CD29, CD59, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD166, and MHC I were present on human MSCs, but not on rabbit MSCs. However, desmin was present on rabbit MSCs, but not on human MSCs. In total, the surface expression of nine markers differed between human and rabbit MSCs, whereas the surface expression of 16 markers was the same in the two cell lines. Public Library of Science 2014-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4224397/ /pubmed/25380245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111390 Text en © 2014 Lee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Tao-Chen
Lee, Tsung-Han
Huang, Yu-Hua
Chang, Nyuk-Kong
Lin, Yu-Jun
Chien, Pei-Wen Chang
Yang, Wei-Hsun
Lin, Martin Hsiu-Chu
Comparison of Surface Markers between Human and Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells
title Comparison of Surface Markers between Human and Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells
title_full Comparison of Surface Markers between Human and Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells
title_fullStr Comparison of Surface Markers between Human and Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Surface Markers between Human and Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells
title_short Comparison of Surface Markers between Human and Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells
title_sort comparison of surface markers between human and rabbit mesenchymal stem cells
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25380245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111390
work_keys_str_mv AT leetaochen comparisonofsurfacemarkersbetweenhumanandrabbitmesenchymalstemcells
AT leetsunghan comparisonofsurfacemarkersbetweenhumanandrabbitmesenchymalstemcells
AT huangyuhua comparisonofsurfacemarkersbetweenhumanandrabbitmesenchymalstemcells
AT changnyukkong comparisonofsurfacemarkersbetweenhumanandrabbitmesenchymalstemcells
AT linyujun comparisonofsurfacemarkersbetweenhumanandrabbitmesenchymalstemcells
AT chienpeiwenchang comparisonofsurfacemarkersbetweenhumanandrabbitmesenchymalstemcells
AT yangweihsun comparisonofsurfacemarkersbetweenhumanandrabbitmesenchymalstemcells
AT linmartinhsiuchu comparisonofsurfacemarkersbetweenhumanandrabbitmesenchymalstemcells