Cargando…

Protocol for a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components compared to other resuscitative fluids in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of blood components for pre-hospital resuscitation of patients with major traumatic haemorrhage. It has been speculated that early resuscitation with blood components may have benefits in terms of treating trauma-induced coagulopathy, which in turn ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dretzke, Janine, Smith, Iain M, James, Robert H, Midwinter, Mark J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25344301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-123
_version_ 1782343380988067840
author Dretzke, Janine
Smith, Iain M
James, Robert H
Midwinter, Mark J
author_facet Dretzke, Janine
Smith, Iain M
James, Robert H
Midwinter, Mark J
author_sort Dretzke, Janine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of blood components for pre-hospital resuscitation of patients with major traumatic haemorrhage. It has been speculated that early resuscitation with blood components may have benefits in terms of treating trauma-induced coagulopathy, which in turn may influence survival. The proposed systematic review will evaluate the evidence on the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components (red blood cells and/or plasma or whole blood), in both civilian and military settings, compared with other resuscitation strategies in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage. METHODS/DESIGN: Standard systematic review methods aimed at minimising bias will be employed for study identification, selection and data extraction. General medical and specialist databases will be searched; the search strategy will combine terms for the population, intervention and setting. Studies will be selected for review if the population includes adult patients with major traumatic haemorrhage who receive blood components in a pre-hospital setting (civilian or military). Systematic reviews, randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and controlled observational studies will be included. Uncontrolled studies will be considered depending on the volume of controlled evidence. Quality assessment will be tailored to different study designs. Both patient related and surrogate outcomes will be considered. Synthesis is likely to be primarily narrative, but meta-analyses and subgroup analyses will be undertaken where clinical and methodological homogeneity exists. DISCUSSION: Given the increasing use by emergency services of blood components for pre-hospital resuscitation, this is a timely systematic review, which will attempt to clarify the evidence base for this practice. As far as the authors are aware, the proposed systematic review will be the first to address this topic. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014013794
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4224592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42245922014-11-08 Protocol for a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components compared to other resuscitative fluids in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage Dretzke, Janine Smith, Iain M James, Robert H Midwinter, Mark J Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of blood components for pre-hospital resuscitation of patients with major traumatic haemorrhage. It has been speculated that early resuscitation with blood components may have benefits in terms of treating trauma-induced coagulopathy, which in turn may influence survival. The proposed systematic review will evaluate the evidence on the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components (red blood cells and/or plasma or whole blood), in both civilian and military settings, compared with other resuscitation strategies in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage. METHODS/DESIGN: Standard systematic review methods aimed at minimising bias will be employed for study identification, selection and data extraction. General medical and specialist databases will be searched; the search strategy will combine terms for the population, intervention and setting. Studies will be selected for review if the population includes adult patients with major traumatic haemorrhage who receive blood components in a pre-hospital setting (civilian or military). Systematic reviews, randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and controlled observational studies will be included. Uncontrolled studies will be considered depending on the volume of controlled evidence. Quality assessment will be tailored to different study designs. Both patient related and surrogate outcomes will be considered. Synthesis is likely to be primarily narrative, but meta-analyses and subgroup analyses will be undertaken where clinical and methodological homogeneity exists. DISCUSSION: Given the increasing use by emergency services of blood components for pre-hospital resuscitation, this is a timely systematic review, which will attempt to clarify the evidence base for this practice. As far as the authors are aware, the proposed systematic review will be the first to address this topic. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014013794 BioMed Central 2014-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4224592/ /pubmed/25344301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-123 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dretzke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Dretzke, Janine
Smith, Iain M
James, Robert H
Midwinter, Mark J
Protocol for a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components compared to other resuscitative fluids in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage
title Protocol for a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components compared to other resuscitative fluids in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage
title_full Protocol for a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components compared to other resuscitative fluids in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage
title_fullStr Protocol for a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components compared to other resuscitative fluids in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components compared to other resuscitative fluids in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage
title_short Protocol for a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components compared to other resuscitative fluids in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage
title_sort protocol for a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital blood components compared to other resuscitative fluids in patients with major traumatic haemorrhage
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25344301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-123
work_keys_str_mv AT dretzkejanine protocolforasystematicreviewoftheclinicaleffectivenessofprehospitalbloodcomponentscomparedtootherresuscitativefluidsinpatientswithmajortraumatichaemorrhage
AT smithiainm protocolforasystematicreviewoftheclinicaleffectivenessofprehospitalbloodcomponentscomparedtootherresuscitativefluidsinpatientswithmajortraumatichaemorrhage
AT jamesroberth protocolforasystematicreviewoftheclinicaleffectivenessofprehospitalbloodcomponentscomparedtootherresuscitativefluidsinpatientswithmajortraumatichaemorrhage
AT midwintermarkj protocolforasystematicreviewoftheclinicaleffectivenessofprehospitalbloodcomponentscomparedtootherresuscitativefluidsinpatientswithmajortraumatichaemorrhage