Cargando…
The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL
INTRODUCTION: In previous studies, protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy has shown trends for higher low-level elevations in HIV-1 RNA compared to triple therapy, but no increase in the risk of drug resistance. METHODS: A total of 273 patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for over 24 weeks on curre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International AIDS Society
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25394034 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19525 |
_version_ | 1782343428127850496 |
---|---|
author | Antinori, Andrea Arribas, Jose Fehr, Jan Girard, Pierre-Marie Horban, Andrzej Hill, Andrew van Delft, Yvon Moecklinghoff, Christiane Hill, Andrew |
author_facet | Antinori, Andrea Arribas, Jose Fehr, Jan Girard, Pierre-Marie Horban, Andrzej Hill, Andrew van Delft, Yvon Moecklinghoff, Christiane Hill, Andrew |
author_sort | Antinori, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In previous studies, protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy has shown trends for higher low-level elevations in HIV-1 RNA compared to triple therapy, but no increase in the risk of drug resistance. METHODS: A total of 273 patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for over 24 weeks on current antiretrovirals switched to DRV/r (darunavir/ritonavir) 800/100 mg once-daily, either as monotherapy (n=137) or with 2NRTIs (nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors) (n=136), after a 4 week run-in phase with DRV/r + 2NRTI. Treatment failure was defined as HIV-1 RNA levels above 50 copies/mL (FDA Snapshot method) by Week 48, or switches off study treatment. Patients with elevations in HIV-1 RNA on DRV/r monotherapy could be re-intensified with NRTIs. The trial had 80% power to show non-inferiority for the monotherapy arm (delta = − 12%). RESULTS: Patients were 83% male and 87% Caucasian, with mean age 42 years; 10% were HCV antibody positive. In the DRV/r monotherapy arm, there were more patients with nadir CD4 count below 200 cells/µL (30% versus 22%). In the primary efficacy analysis, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by Week 48 (intent-to-treat (ITT)) was 118/137 (86.1%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm versus 129/136 (94.9%) in the triple therapy arm; DRV/r monotherapy did not show non-inferiority versus triple therapy in the primary analysis (difference=− 8.7%, 95% CI −15.5 to −1.8%). In the multivariate analysis, the main predictor of treatment failure was nadir CD4 count. For patients with nadir CD4 counts <200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates at Week 48 were 27/41 (66%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 29/30 (97%) in the triple therapy arm; for patients with CD4 nadir at least 200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates were 91/96 (95%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 100/106 (94%) in the triple therapy arm. In the overall population, by a switch included analysis, efficacy was 92.0% versus 96.3%, showing non-inferiority (difference=− 4.3%, 95% CI=−9.7 to +1.2%). No treatment-emergent primary PI mutations were detected in three patients with sustained elevations in HIV-1 RNA at least 400 copies/mL (two on PI monotherapy, one on triple therapy). CD4 counts remained stable during the trial in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this study for patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at baseline, switching to DRV/r monotherapy showed lower efficacy versus triple antiretroviral therapy at Week 48 in the primary switch equals failure analysis (86% versus 95%). However, this lower efficacy was seen mainly in patients with CD4 nadir levels below 200 cells/µL. There was no development of PI resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4224888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | International AIDS Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42248882014-11-13 The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL Antinori, Andrea Arribas, Jose Fehr, Jan Girard, Pierre-Marie Horban, Andrzej Hill, Andrew van Delft, Yvon Moecklinghoff, Christiane Hill, Andrew J Int AIDS Soc Oral Presentation – Abstract O423A INTRODUCTION: In previous studies, protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy has shown trends for higher low-level elevations in HIV-1 RNA compared to triple therapy, but no increase in the risk of drug resistance. METHODS: A total of 273 patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for over 24 weeks on current antiretrovirals switched to DRV/r (darunavir/ritonavir) 800/100 mg once-daily, either as monotherapy (n=137) or with 2NRTIs (nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors) (n=136), after a 4 week run-in phase with DRV/r + 2NRTI. Treatment failure was defined as HIV-1 RNA levels above 50 copies/mL (FDA Snapshot method) by Week 48, or switches off study treatment. Patients with elevations in HIV-1 RNA on DRV/r monotherapy could be re-intensified with NRTIs. The trial had 80% power to show non-inferiority for the monotherapy arm (delta = − 12%). RESULTS: Patients were 83% male and 87% Caucasian, with mean age 42 years; 10% were HCV antibody positive. In the DRV/r monotherapy arm, there were more patients with nadir CD4 count below 200 cells/µL (30% versus 22%). In the primary efficacy analysis, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by Week 48 (intent-to-treat (ITT)) was 118/137 (86.1%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm versus 129/136 (94.9%) in the triple therapy arm; DRV/r monotherapy did not show non-inferiority versus triple therapy in the primary analysis (difference=− 8.7%, 95% CI −15.5 to −1.8%). In the multivariate analysis, the main predictor of treatment failure was nadir CD4 count. For patients with nadir CD4 counts <200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates at Week 48 were 27/41 (66%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 29/30 (97%) in the triple therapy arm; for patients with CD4 nadir at least 200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates were 91/96 (95%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 100/106 (94%) in the triple therapy arm. In the overall population, by a switch included analysis, efficacy was 92.0% versus 96.3%, showing non-inferiority (difference=− 4.3%, 95% CI=−9.7 to +1.2%). No treatment-emergent primary PI mutations were detected in three patients with sustained elevations in HIV-1 RNA at least 400 copies/mL (two on PI monotherapy, one on triple therapy). CD4 counts remained stable during the trial in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this study for patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at baseline, switching to DRV/r monotherapy showed lower efficacy versus triple antiretroviral therapy at Week 48 in the primary switch equals failure analysis (86% versus 95%). However, this lower efficacy was seen mainly in patients with CD4 nadir levels below 200 cells/µL. There was no development of PI resistance. International AIDS Society 2014-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4224888/ /pubmed/25394034 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19525 Text en © 2014 Antinori A et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Oral Presentation – Abstract O423A Antinori, Andrea Arribas, Jose Fehr, Jan Girard, Pierre-Marie Horban, Andrzej Hill, Andrew van Delft, Yvon Moecklinghoff, Christiane Hill, Andrew The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL |
title | The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL |
title_full | The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL |
title_fullStr | The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL |
title_full_unstemmed | The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL |
title_short | The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL |
title_sort | protea trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with hiv-1 rna below 50 copies/ml |
topic | Oral Presentation – Abstract O423A |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25394034 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19525 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antinoriandrea theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT arribasjose theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT fehrjan theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT girardpierremarie theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT horbanandrzej theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT hillandrew theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT vandelftyvon theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT moecklinghoffchristiane theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT hillandrew theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT antinoriandrea proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT arribasjose proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT fehrjan proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT girardpierremarie proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT horbanandrzej proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT hillandrew proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT vandelftyvon proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT moecklinghoffchristiane proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml AT hillandrew proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml |