Cargando…

The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL

INTRODUCTION: In previous studies, protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy has shown trends for higher low-level elevations in HIV-1 RNA compared to triple therapy, but no increase in the risk of drug resistance. METHODS: A total of 273 patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for over 24 weeks on curre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antinori, Andrea, Arribas, Jose, Fehr, Jan, Girard, Pierre-Marie, Horban, Andrzej, Hill, Andrew, van Delft, Yvon, Moecklinghoff, Christiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International AIDS Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25394034
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19525
_version_ 1782343428127850496
author Antinori, Andrea
Arribas, Jose
Fehr, Jan
Girard, Pierre-Marie
Horban, Andrzej
Hill, Andrew
van Delft, Yvon
Moecklinghoff, Christiane
Hill, Andrew
author_facet Antinori, Andrea
Arribas, Jose
Fehr, Jan
Girard, Pierre-Marie
Horban, Andrzej
Hill, Andrew
van Delft, Yvon
Moecklinghoff, Christiane
Hill, Andrew
author_sort Antinori, Andrea
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In previous studies, protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy has shown trends for higher low-level elevations in HIV-1 RNA compared to triple therapy, but no increase in the risk of drug resistance. METHODS: A total of 273 patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for over 24 weeks on current antiretrovirals switched to DRV/r (darunavir/ritonavir) 800/100 mg once-daily, either as monotherapy (n=137) or with 2NRTIs (nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors) (n=136), after a 4 week run-in phase with DRV/r + 2NRTI. Treatment failure was defined as HIV-1 RNA levels above 50 copies/mL (FDA Snapshot method) by Week 48, or switches off study treatment. Patients with elevations in HIV-1 RNA on DRV/r monotherapy could be re-intensified with NRTIs. The trial had 80% power to show non-inferiority for the monotherapy arm (delta = − 12%). RESULTS: Patients were 83% male and 87% Caucasian, with mean age 42 years; 10% were HCV antibody positive. In the DRV/r monotherapy arm, there were more patients with nadir CD4 count below 200 cells/µL (30% versus 22%). In the primary efficacy analysis, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by Week 48 (intent-to-treat (ITT)) was 118/137 (86.1%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm versus 129/136 (94.9%) in the triple therapy arm; DRV/r monotherapy did not show non-inferiority versus triple therapy in the primary analysis (difference=− 8.7%, 95% CI −15.5 to −1.8%). In the multivariate analysis, the main predictor of treatment failure was nadir CD4 count. For patients with nadir CD4 counts <200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates at Week 48 were 27/41 (66%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 29/30 (97%) in the triple therapy arm; for patients with CD4 nadir at least 200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates were 91/96 (95%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 100/106 (94%) in the triple therapy arm. In the overall population, by a switch included analysis, efficacy was 92.0% versus 96.3%, showing non-inferiority (difference=− 4.3%, 95% CI=−9.7 to +1.2%). No treatment-emergent primary PI mutations were detected in three patients with sustained elevations in HIV-1 RNA at least 400 copies/mL (two on PI monotherapy, one on triple therapy). CD4 counts remained stable during the trial in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this study for patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at baseline, switching to DRV/r monotherapy showed lower efficacy versus triple antiretroviral therapy at Week 48 in the primary switch equals failure analysis (86% versus 95%). However, this lower efficacy was seen mainly in patients with CD4 nadir levels below 200 cells/µL. There was no development of PI resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4224888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42248882014-11-13 The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL Antinori, Andrea Arribas, Jose Fehr, Jan Girard, Pierre-Marie Horban, Andrzej Hill, Andrew van Delft, Yvon Moecklinghoff, Christiane Hill, Andrew J Int AIDS Soc Oral Presentation – Abstract O423A INTRODUCTION: In previous studies, protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy has shown trends for higher low-level elevations in HIV-1 RNA compared to triple therapy, but no increase in the risk of drug resistance. METHODS: A total of 273 patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for over 24 weeks on current antiretrovirals switched to DRV/r (darunavir/ritonavir) 800/100 mg once-daily, either as monotherapy (n=137) or with 2NRTIs (nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors) (n=136), after a 4 week run-in phase with DRV/r + 2NRTI. Treatment failure was defined as HIV-1 RNA levels above 50 copies/mL (FDA Snapshot method) by Week 48, or switches off study treatment. Patients with elevations in HIV-1 RNA on DRV/r monotherapy could be re-intensified with NRTIs. The trial had 80% power to show non-inferiority for the monotherapy arm (delta = − 12%). RESULTS: Patients were 83% male and 87% Caucasian, with mean age 42 years; 10% were HCV antibody positive. In the DRV/r monotherapy arm, there were more patients with nadir CD4 count below 200 cells/µL (30% versus 22%). In the primary efficacy analysis, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by Week 48 (intent-to-treat (ITT)) was 118/137 (86.1%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm versus 129/136 (94.9%) in the triple therapy arm; DRV/r monotherapy did not show non-inferiority versus triple therapy in the primary analysis (difference=− 8.7%, 95% CI −15.5 to −1.8%). In the multivariate analysis, the main predictor of treatment failure was nadir CD4 count. For patients with nadir CD4 counts <200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates at Week 48 were 27/41 (66%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 29/30 (97%) in the triple therapy arm; for patients with CD4 nadir at least 200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates were 91/96 (95%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 100/106 (94%) in the triple therapy arm. In the overall population, by a switch included analysis, efficacy was 92.0% versus 96.3%, showing non-inferiority (difference=− 4.3%, 95% CI=−9.7 to +1.2%). No treatment-emergent primary PI mutations were detected in three patients with sustained elevations in HIV-1 RNA at least 400 copies/mL (two on PI monotherapy, one on triple therapy). CD4 counts remained stable during the trial in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this study for patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at baseline, switching to DRV/r monotherapy showed lower efficacy versus triple antiretroviral therapy at Week 48 in the primary switch equals failure analysis (86% versus 95%). However, this lower efficacy was seen mainly in patients with CD4 nadir levels below 200 cells/µL. There was no development of PI resistance. International AIDS Society 2014-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4224888/ /pubmed/25394034 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19525 Text en © 2014 Antinori A et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oral Presentation – Abstract O423A
Antinori, Andrea
Arribas, Jose
Fehr, Jan
Girard, Pierre-Marie
Horban, Andrzej
Hill, Andrew
van Delft, Yvon
Moecklinghoff, Christiane
Hill, Andrew
The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL
title The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL
title_full The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL
title_fullStr The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL
title_full_unstemmed The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL
title_short The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL
title_sort protea trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with hiv-1 rna below 50 copies/ml
topic Oral Presentation – Abstract O423A
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25394034
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19525
work_keys_str_mv AT antinoriandrea theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT arribasjose theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT fehrjan theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT girardpierremarie theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT horbanandrzej theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT hillandrew theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT vandelftyvon theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT moecklinghoffchristiane theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT hillandrew theproteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT antinoriandrea proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT arribasjose proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT fehrjan proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT girardpierremarie proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT horbanandrzej proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT hillandrew proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT vandelftyvon proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT moecklinghoffchristiane proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml
AT hillandrew proteatrialdarunavirritonavirwithorwithoutnucleosideanaloguesforpatientswithhiv1rnabelow50copiesml