Cargando…
Introducing the non-invasive prenatal test for trisomy 21 in Belgium: a cost-consequences analysis
BACKGROUND: The first- and second-trimester screening for trisomy 21 (T21) are reimbursed for all pregnant women in Belgium. Using a cut-off risk of 1:300 for T21, about 5% of all pregnant women are referred for definitive prenatal diagnosis using an invasive test, at a sensitivity of (only) 72.5%....
Autores principales: | Neyt, Mattias, Hulstaert, Frank, Gyselaers, Wilfried |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25380810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005922 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A cost-utility analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Belgium: focusing on a well-defined and identifiable population
por: Neyt, Mattias, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
por: Shang, Wenru, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening Strategies Involving Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomy 21
por: Wang, Shuxian, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure: a lifetime Markov model
por: Neyt, Mattias, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Comparing Non-invasive Prenatal Testing With Invasive Testing for the Detection of Trisomy 21
por: Mokhtar, Rifat, et al.
Publicado: (2022)