Cargando…

Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the performance of VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid) trained nurses to learn colposcopy and the Swede score method to detect cervical lesions by using stationary colposcope or a portable, hand-held colposcope; the Gynocular, as compared to doctors. DESIGN: A crossove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nessa, Ashrafun, Roy, Joya Shree, Chowdhury, Most Afroza, Khanam, Quayuma, Afroz, Romena, Wistrand, Charlotte, Thuresson, Marcus, Thorsell, Malin, Shemer, Isaac, Wikström Shemer, Elisabeth Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25366674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005313
_version_ 1782343466738515968
author Nessa, Ashrafun
Roy, Joya Shree
Chowdhury, Most Afroza
Khanam, Quayuma
Afroz, Romena
Wistrand, Charlotte
Thuresson, Marcus
Thorsell, Malin
Shemer, Isaac
Wikström Shemer, Elisabeth Andrea
author_facet Nessa, Ashrafun
Roy, Joya Shree
Chowdhury, Most Afroza
Khanam, Quayuma
Afroz, Romena
Wistrand, Charlotte
Thuresson, Marcus
Thorsell, Malin
Shemer, Isaac
Wikström Shemer, Elisabeth Andrea
author_sort Nessa, Ashrafun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the performance of VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid) trained nurses to learn colposcopy and the Swede score method to detect cervical lesions by using stationary colposcope or a portable, hand-held colposcope; the Gynocular, as compared to doctors. DESIGN: A crossover randomised clinical trial. SETTING: The Colposcopy Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. PARTICIPANTS: 932 women attending the clinic as either screening naïve for VIA screening (404) or women referred as VIA positive (528) from other VIA screening centres in the Dhaka region. INTERVENTION: VIA trained nurses were trained on-site in colposcopy and in the Swede score systematic colposcopy method. The Swede score grade cervical acetowhiteness, margins plus surface. vessel pattern, lesion size and iodine staining. The women were randomised to start the examination by either a stationary colposcope or the Gynocular. Swede scores were first obtained by a nurse and the same patient was equally evaluated by a doctor. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement between nurses and doctors in Swede scores was evaluated using the weighted κ statistic for the Gynocular and standard colposcope. The ability to predict CIN 2+ (CIN 2, CIN 3 and invasive cervical cancer) using Swede scores was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The Swede scores obtained by nurses and doctors using the Gynocular and stationary colposcope showed high agreement with a κ statistic of 0.858 and 0.859, respectively, and no difference in detecting cervical lesions in biopsy. Biopsy detected CIN 2+ in 39 (4.2%) women. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that VIA nurses can perform colposcopy. There was no significant differences compared to doctors in detecting cervical lesions by stationary colposcope or the Gynocular using the Swede score system. Swede scores obtained by nurses using the Gynocular could offer an accurate cervical diagnostic approach in low resource settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN53264564.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4225233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42252332014-11-13 Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting Nessa, Ashrafun Roy, Joya Shree Chowdhury, Most Afroza Khanam, Quayuma Afroz, Romena Wistrand, Charlotte Thuresson, Marcus Thorsell, Malin Shemer, Isaac Wikström Shemer, Elisabeth Andrea BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the performance of VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid) trained nurses to learn colposcopy and the Swede score method to detect cervical lesions by using stationary colposcope or a portable, hand-held colposcope; the Gynocular, as compared to doctors. DESIGN: A crossover randomised clinical trial. SETTING: The Colposcopy Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. PARTICIPANTS: 932 women attending the clinic as either screening naïve for VIA screening (404) or women referred as VIA positive (528) from other VIA screening centres in the Dhaka region. INTERVENTION: VIA trained nurses were trained on-site in colposcopy and in the Swede score systematic colposcopy method. The Swede score grade cervical acetowhiteness, margins plus surface. vessel pattern, lesion size and iodine staining. The women were randomised to start the examination by either a stationary colposcope or the Gynocular. Swede scores were first obtained by a nurse and the same patient was equally evaluated by a doctor. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement between nurses and doctors in Swede scores was evaluated using the weighted κ statistic for the Gynocular and standard colposcope. The ability to predict CIN 2+ (CIN 2, CIN 3 and invasive cervical cancer) using Swede scores was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The Swede scores obtained by nurses and doctors using the Gynocular and stationary colposcope showed high agreement with a κ statistic of 0.858 and 0.859, respectively, and no difference in detecting cervical lesions in biopsy. Biopsy detected CIN 2+ in 39 (4.2%) women. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that VIA nurses can perform colposcopy. There was no significant differences compared to doctors in detecting cervical lesions by stationary colposcope or the Gynocular using the Swede score system. Swede scores obtained by nurses using the Gynocular could offer an accurate cervical diagnostic approach in low resource settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN53264564. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4225233/ /pubmed/25366674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005313 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Nessa, Ashrafun
Roy, Joya Shree
Chowdhury, Most Afroza
Khanam, Quayuma
Afroz, Romena
Wistrand, Charlotte
Thuresson, Marcus
Thorsell, Malin
Shemer, Isaac
Wikström Shemer, Elisabeth Andrea
Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting
title Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting
title_full Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting
title_fullStr Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting
title_short Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting
title_sort evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and gynocular in a low-resource setting
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25366674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005313
work_keys_str_mv AT nessaashrafun evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting
AT royjoyashree evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting
AT chowdhurymostafroza evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting
AT khanamquayuma evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting
AT afrozromena evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting
AT wistrandcharlotte evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting
AT thuressonmarcus evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting
AT thorsellmalin evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting
AT shemerisaac evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting
AT wikstromshemerelisabethandrea evaluationoftheaccuracyindetectingcervicallesionsbynursesversusdoctorsusingastationarycolposcopeandgynocularinalowresourcesetting