Cargando…

Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis

INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural effusion can complicate most cancers. It causes breathlessness and requires hospitalisation for invasive pleural drainages. Malignant effusions often herald advanced cancers and limited prognosis. Minimising time spent in hospital is of high priority to patients and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fysh, Edward T H, Thomas, Rajesh, Read, Catherine A, Lam, Ben C H, Yap, Elaine, Horwood, Fiona C, Lee, Pyng, Piccolo, Francesco, Shrestha, Ranjan, Garske, Luke A, Lam, David C L, Rosenstengel, Andrew, Bint, Michael, Murray, Kevin, Smith, Nicola A, Lee, Y C Gary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006757
_version_ 1782343468384780288
author Fysh, Edward T H
Thomas, Rajesh
Read, Catherine A
Lam, Ben C H
Yap, Elaine
Horwood, Fiona C
Lee, Pyng
Piccolo, Francesco
Shrestha, Ranjan
Garske, Luke A
Lam, David C L
Rosenstengel, Andrew
Bint, Michael
Murray, Kevin
Smith, Nicola A
Lee, Y C Gary
author_facet Fysh, Edward T H
Thomas, Rajesh
Read, Catherine A
Lam, Ben C H
Yap, Elaine
Horwood, Fiona C
Lee, Pyng
Piccolo, Francesco
Shrestha, Ranjan
Garske, Luke A
Lam, David C L
Rosenstengel, Andrew
Bint, Michael
Murray, Kevin
Smith, Nicola A
Lee, Y C Gary
author_sort Fysh, Edward T H
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural effusion can complicate most cancers. It causes breathlessness and requires hospitalisation for invasive pleural drainages. Malignant effusions often herald advanced cancers and limited prognosis. Minimising time spent in hospital is of high priority to patients and their families. Various treatment strategies exist for the management of malignant effusions, though there is no consensus governing the best choice. Talc pleurodesis is the conventional management but requires hospitalisation (and substantial healthcare resources), can cause significant side effects, and has a suboptimal success rate. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) allow ambulatory fluid drainage without hospitalisation, and are increasingly employed for management of malignant effusions. Previous studies have only investigated the length of hospital care immediately related to IPC insertion. Whether IPC management reduces time spent in hospital in the patients’ remaining lifespan is unknown. A strategy of malignant effusion management that reduces hospital admission days will allow patients to spend more time outside hospital, reduce costs and save healthcare resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial is a multicentred, randomised trial designed to compare IPC with talc pleurodesis for the management of malignant pleural effusion. This study will randomise 146 adults with malignant pleural effusions (1:1) to IPC management or talc slurry pleurodesis. The primary end point is the total number of days spent in hospital (for any admissions) from treatment procedure to death or end of study follow-up. Secondary end points include hospital days specific to pleural effusion management, adverse events, self-reported symptom and quality-of-life scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Sir Charles Gairdner Group Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the study as have the ethics boards of all the participating hospitals. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry—ACTRN12611000567921; National Institutes of Health—NCT02045121.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4225240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42252402014-11-13 Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis Fysh, Edward T H Thomas, Rajesh Read, Catherine A Lam, Ben C H Yap, Elaine Horwood, Fiona C Lee, Pyng Piccolo, Francesco Shrestha, Ranjan Garske, Luke A Lam, David C L Rosenstengel, Andrew Bint, Michael Murray, Kevin Smith, Nicola A Lee, Y C Gary BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural effusion can complicate most cancers. It causes breathlessness and requires hospitalisation for invasive pleural drainages. Malignant effusions often herald advanced cancers and limited prognosis. Minimising time spent in hospital is of high priority to patients and their families. Various treatment strategies exist for the management of malignant effusions, though there is no consensus governing the best choice. Talc pleurodesis is the conventional management but requires hospitalisation (and substantial healthcare resources), can cause significant side effects, and has a suboptimal success rate. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) allow ambulatory fluid drainage without hospitalisation, and are increasingly employed for management of malignant effusions. Previous studies have only investigated the length of hospital care immediately related to IPC insertion. Whether IPC management reduces time spent in hospital in the patients’ remaining lifespan is unknown. A strategy of malignant effusion management that reduces hospital admission days will allow patients to spend more time outside hospital, reduce costs and save healthcare resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial is a multicentred, randomised trial designed to compare IPC with talc pleurodesis for the management of malignant pleural effusion. This study will randomise 146 adults with malignant pleural effusions (1:1) to IPC management or talc slurry pleurodesis. The primary end point is the total number of days spent in hospital (for any admissions) from treatment procedure to death or end of study follow-up. Secondary end points include hospital days specific to pleural effusion management, adverse events, self-reported symptom and quality-of-life scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Sir Charles Gairdner Group Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the study as have the ethics boards of all the participating hospitals. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry—ACTRN12611000567921; National Institutes of Health—NCT02045121. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4225240/ /pubmed/25377015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006757 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Respiratory Medicine
Fysh, Edward T H
Thomas, Rajesh
Read, Catherine A
Lam, Ben C H
Yap, Elaine
Horwood, Fiona C
Lee, Pyng
Piccolo, Francesco
Shrestha, Ranjan
Garske, Luke A
Lam, David C L
Rosenstengel, Andrew
Bint, Michael
Murray, Kevin
Smith, Nicola A
Lee, Y C Gary
Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis
title Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis
title_full Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis
title_fullStr Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis
title_full_unstemmed Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis
title_short Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis
title_sort protocol of the australasian malignant pleural effusion (ample) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis
topic Respiratory Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006757
work_keys_str_mv AT fyshedwardth protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT thomasrajesh protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT readcatherinea protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT lambench protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT yapelaine protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT horwoodfionac protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT leepyng protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT piccolofrancesco protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT shrestharanjan protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT garskelukea protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT lamdavidcl protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT rosenstengelandrew protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT bintmichael protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT murraykevin protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT smithnicolaa protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis
AT leeycgary protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis