Cargando…
Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis
INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural effusion can complicate most cancers. It causes breathlessness and requires hospitalisation for invasive pleural drainages. Malignant effusions often herald advanced cancers and limited prognosis. Minimising time spent in hospital is of high priority to patients and t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006757 |
_version_ | 1782343468384780288 |
---|---|
author | Fysh, Edward T H Thomas, Rajesh Read, Catherine A Lam, Ben C H Yap, Elaine Horwood, Fiona C Lee, Pyng Piccolo, Francesco Shrestha, Ranjan Garske, Luke A Lam, David C L Rosenstengel, Andrew Bint, Michael Murray, Kevin Smith, Nicola A Lee, Y C Gary |
author_facet | Fysh, Edward T H Thomas, Rajesh Read, Catherine A Lam, Ben C H Yap, Elaine Horwood, Fiona C Lee, Pyng Piccolo, Francesco Shrestha, Ranjan Garske, Luke A Lam, David C L Rosenstengel, Andrew Bint, Michael Murray, Kevin Smith, Nicola A Lee, Y C Gary |
author_sort | Fysh, Edward T H |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural effusion can complicate most cancers. It causes breathlessness and requires hospitalisation for invasive pleural drainages. Malignant effusions often herald advanced cancers and limited prognosis. Minimising time spent in hospital is of high priority to patients and their families. Various treatment strategies exist for the management of malignant effusions, though there is no consensus governing the best choice. Talc pleurodesis is the conventional management but requires hospitalisation (and substantial healthcare resources), can cause significant side effects, and has a suboptimal success rate. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) allow ambulatory fluid drainage without hospitalisation, and are increasingly employed for management of malignant effusions. Previous studies have only investigated the length of hospital care immediately related to IPC insertion. Whether IPC management reduces time spent in hospital in the patients’ remaining lifespan is unknown. A strategy of malignant effusion management that reduces hospital admission days will allow patients to spend more time outside hospital, reduce costs and save healthcare resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial is a multicentred, randomised trial designed to compare IPC with talc pleurodesis for the management of malignant pleural effusion. This study will randomise 146 adults with malignant pleural effusions (1:1) to IPC management or talc slurry pleurodesis. The primary end point is the total number of days spent in hospital (for any admissions) from treatment procedure to death or end of study follow-up. Secondary end points include hospital days specific to pleural effusion management, adverse events, self-reported symptom and quality-of-life scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Sir Charles Gairdner Group Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the study as have the ethics boards of all the participating hospitals. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry—ACTRN12611000567921; National Institutes of Health—NCT02045121. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4225240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42252402014-11-13 Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis Fysh, Edward T H Thomas, Rajesh Read, Catherine A Lam, Ben C H Yap, Elaine Horwood, Fiona C Lee, Pyng Piccolo, Francesco Shrestha, Ranjan Garske, Luke A Lam, David C L Rosenstengel, Andrew Bint, Michael Murray, Kevin Smith, Nicola A Lee, Y C Gary BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural effusion can complicate most cancers. It causes breathlessness and requires hospitalisation for invasive pleural drainages. Malignant effusions often herald advanced cancers and limited prognosis. Minimising time spent in hospital is of high priority to patients and their families. Various treatment strategies exist for the management of malignant effusions, though there is no consensus governing the best choice. Talc pleurodesis is the conventional management but requires hospitalisation (and substantial healthcare resources), can cause significant side effects, and has a suboptimal success rate. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) allow ambulatory fluid drainage without hospitalisation, and are increasingly employed for management of malignant effusions. Previous studies have only investigated the length of hospital care immediately related to IPC insertion. Whether IPC management reduces time spent in hospital in the patients’ remaining lifespan is unknown. A strategy of malignant effusion management that reduces hospital admission days will allow patients to spend more time outside hospital, reduce costs and save healthcare resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial is a multicentred, randomised trial designed to compare IPC with talc pleurodesis for the management of malignant pleural effusion. This study will randomise 146 adults with malignant pleural effusions (1:1) to IPC management or talc slurry pleurodesis. The primary end point is the total number of days spent in hospital (for any admissions) from treatment procedure to death or end of study follow-up. Secondary end points include hospital days specific to pleural effusion management, adverse events, self-reported symptom and quality-of-life scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Sir Charles Gairdner Group Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the study as have the ethics boards of all the participating hospitals. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry—ACTRN12611000567921; National Institutes of Health—NCT02045121. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4225240/ /pubmed/25377015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006757 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Respiratory Medicine Fysh, Edward T H Thomas, Rajesh Read, Catherine A Lam, Ben C H Yap, Elaine Horwood, Fiona C Lee, Pyng Piccolo, Francesco Shrestha, Ranjan Garske, Luke A Lam, David C L Rosenstengel, Andrew Bint, Michael Murray, Kevin Smith, Nicola A Lee, Y C Gary Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis |
title | Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis |
title_full | Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis |
title_fullStr | Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis |
title_short | Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis |
title_sort | protocol of the australasian malignant pleural effusion (ample) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis |
topic | Respiratory Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006757 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fyshedwardth protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT thomasrajesh protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT readcatherinea protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT lambench protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT yapelaine protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT horwoodfionac protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT leepyng protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT piccolofrancesco protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT shrestharanjan protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT garskelukea protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT lamdavidcl protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT rosenstengelandrew protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT bintmichael protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT murraykevin protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT smithnicolaa protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis AT leeycgary protocoloftheaustralasianmalignantpleuraleffusionampletrialamulticentrerandomisedstudycomparingindwellingpleuralcatheterversustalcpleurodesis |