Cargando…

The use of TDM in pregnant HIV-positive women: a retrospective cross-sectional review of five years practice in two large hospitals in Manchester

INTRODUCTION: Despite plasma levels of certain HIV drugs decreasing in the third trimester of pregnancy there is no definitive evidence that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) improves HIV control and prevents mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). Indeed “one-off” TDM measurements are thought to poorl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitfield, Thomas, Dessain, Amabel, Taylor, Kelly, McQuillan, Orla, Looi, Evelyn, Kingston, Margaret, Ajdukiewicz, Katherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International AIDS Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25397445
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19695
_version_ 1782343479000563712
author Whitfield, Thomas
Dessain, Amabel
Taylor, Kelly
McQuillan, Orla
Looi, Evelyn
Kingston, Margaret
Ajdukiewicz, Katherine
author_facet Whitfield, Thomas
Dessain, Amabel
Taylor, Kelly
McQuillan, Orla
Looi, Evelyn
Kingston, Margaret
Ajdukiewicz, Katherine
author_sort Whitfield, Thomas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite plasma levels of certain HIV drugs decreasing in the third trimester of pregnancy there is no definitive evidence that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) improves HIV control and prevents mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). Indeed “one-off” TDM measurements are thought to poorly correlate with overall drug exposure [1]. We aim to describe baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HIV, and to compare their HIV control, management during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes with respect to whether TDM was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional case note analysis was performed on pregnant women with HIV who attended North Manchester General Hospital and Manchester Royal Infirmary from 1st January 2008 to 28th May 2013. RESULTS: A total of 171 pregnancies were included; 39% (n=66) had TDM. The majority of patients were of African origin (85%) and age range was 16–42 years (median 32 years). TDM was found to be associated with a history of poor adherence to therapy (TDM 23%, vs no TDM 10%, p=0.017), although baseline viral load (VL) and CD4 counts were comparable between TDM and non-TDM groups (p=0.4756 and 0.9492, respectively). TDM was also associated with protease inhibitors (PI) (TDM 94% vs no TDM 77%, p= 0.004). Within the PI group, TDM was more strongly associated with atazanavir use than other PI's (55%, p=0.023). TDM was not associated with any other demographic variable or with either of the two hospital sites (p=0.427). TDM was associated with medication alterations during pregnancy (TDM 67% vs no TDM 13%, p=0.052), but was not associated with any difference in outcomes with similar proportions of newly detectable VL during pregnancy (TDM 12% vs no TDM 7%, p=0.220) and VL detectable at birth (TDM 14% vs no TDM 9%, p= 0.293). There were no instances of MTCT. CONCLUSIONS: TDM was associated with PI use and a history of poor adherence at baseline. TDM was not associated with improved HIV control during pregnancy and there was no MTCT. TDM was not shown to have any additional benefit in pregnancy and its routine use is not recommended to improve HIV control or reduce MTCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4225314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42253142014-11-12 The use of TDM in pregnant HIV-positive women: a retrospective cross-sectional review of five years practice in two large hospitals in Manchester Whitfield, Thomas Dessain, Amabel Taylor, Kelly McQuillan, Orla Looi, Evelyn Kingston, Margaret Ajdukiewicz, Katherine J Int AIDS Soc Poster Sessions – Abstract P163 INTRODUCTION: Despite plasma levels of certain HIV drugs decreasing in the third trimester of pregnancy there is no definitive evidence that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) improves HIV control and prevents mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). Indeed “one-off” TDM measurements are thought to poorly correlate with overall drug exposure [1]. We aim to describe baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HIV, and to compare their HIV control, management during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes with respect to whether TDM was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional case note analysis was performed on pregnant women with HIV who attended North Manchester General Hospital and Manchester Royal Infirmary from 1st January 2008 to 28th May 2013. RESULTS: A total of 171 pregnancies were included; 39% (n=66) had TDM. The majority of patients were of African origin (85%) and age range was 16–42 years (median 32 years). TDM was found to be associated with a history of poor adherence to therapy (TDM 23%, vs no TDM 10%, p=0.017), although baseline viral load (VL) and CD4 counts were comparable between TDM and non-TDM groups (p=0.4756 and 0.9492, respectively). TDM was also associated with protease inhibitors (PI) (TDM 94% vs no TDM 77%, p= 0.004). Within the PI group, TDM was more strongly associated with atazanavir use than other PI's (55%, p=0.023). TDM was not associated with any other demographic variable or with either of the two hospital sites (p=0.427). TDM was associated with medication alterations during pregnancy (TDM 67% vs no TDM 13%, p=0.052), but was not associated with any difference in outcomes with similar proportions of newly detectable VL during pregnancy (TDM 12% vs no TDM 7%, p=0.220) and VL detectable at birth (TDM 14% vs no TDM 9%, p= 0.293). There were no instances of MTCT. CONCLUSIONS: TDM was associated with PI use and a history of poor adherence at baseline. TDM was not associated with improved HIV control during pregnancy and there was no MTCT. TDM was not shown to have any additional benefit in pregnancy and its routine use is not recommended to improve HIV control or reduce MTCT. International AIDS Society 2014-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4225314/ /pubmed/25397445 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19695 Text en © 2014 Whitfeld T et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Sessions – Abstract P163
Whitfield, Thomas
Dessain, Amabel
Taylor, Kelly
McQuillan, Orla
Looi, Evelyn
Kingston, Margaret
Ajdukiewicz, Katherine
The use of TDM in pregnant HIV-positive women: a retrospective cross-sectional review of five years practice in two large hospitals in Manchester
title The use of TDM in pregnant HIV-positive women: a retrospective cross-sectional review of five years practice in two large hospitals in Manchester
title_full The use of TDM in pregnant HIV-positive women: a retrospective cross-sectional review of five years practice in two large hospitals in Manchester
title_fullStr The use of TDM in pregnant HIV-positive women: a retrospective cross-sectional review of five years practice in two large hospitals in Manchester
title_full_unstemmed The use of TDM in pregnant HIV-positive women: a retrospective cross-sectional review of five years practice in two large hospitals in Manchester
title_short The use of TDM in pregnant HIV-positive women: a retrospective cross-sectional review of five years practice in two large hospitals in Manchester
title_sort use of tdm in pregnant hiv-positive women: a retrospective cross-sectional review of five years practice in two large hospitals in manchester
topic Poster Sessions – Abstract P163
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25397445
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19695
work_keys_str_mv AT whitfieldthomas theuseoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT dessainamabel theuseoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT taylorkelly theuseoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT mcquillanorla theuseoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT looievelyn theuseoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT kingstonmargaret theuseoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT ajdukiewiczkatherine theuseoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT whitfieldthomas useoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT dessainamabel useoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT taylorkelly useoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT mcquillanorla useoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT looievelyn useoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT kingstonmargaret useoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester
AT ajdukiewiczkatherine useoftdminpregnanthivpositivewomenaretrospectivecrosssectionalreviewoffiveyearspracticeintwolargehospitalsinmanchester