Cargando…

Treatment outcome in HIV+ patients receiving 3- or 4-drug regimens during PHI

INTRODUCTION: The optimal timing and modality of therapeutic intervention during early phases of HIV infection is still debated; in our prospective observational study we evaluated immunological and virological outcome in HIV+ patients treated during acute or recent HIV infection. MATERIALS AND METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maria Bottani, Giulia, Letizia Oreni, Maria, Orofino, Giancarlo, Tau, Pamela, Di Nardo Stuppino, Silvia, Colella, Elisa, Carosella, Sinibaldo, Guastavigna, Marta, Ghisetti, Valeria, Micheli, Valeria, Galli, Massimo, Rusconi, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International AIDS Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25397522
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19778
_version_ 1782343506481643520
author Maria Bottani, Giulia
Letizia Oreni, Maria
Orofino, Giancarlo
Tau, Pamela
Di Nardo Stuppino, Silvia
Colella, Elisa
Carosella, Sinibaldo
Guastavigna, Marta
Ghisetti, Valeria
Micheli, Valeria
Galli, Massimo
Rusconi, Stefano
author_facet Maria Bottani, Giulia
Letizia Oreni, Maria
Orofino, Giancarlo
Tau, Pamela
Di Nardo Stuppino, Silvia
Colella, Elisa
Carosella, Sinibaldo
Guastavigna, Marta
Ghisetti, Valeria
Micheli, Valeria
Galli, Massimo
Rusconi, Stefano
author_sort Maria Bottani, Giulia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The optimal timing and modality of therapeutic intervention during early phases of HIV infection is still debated; in our prospective observational study we evaluated immunological and virological outcome in HIV+ patients treated during acute or recent HIV infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 naïve patients with acute (detectable HIV-RNA, immature Western Blot) or recent (documented infection within six months) HIV infection were recruited at the Infectious Diseases Units of the University of Milan and Turin from 2009 to 2014. Patients received treatment with two NRTIs+one NNRTI/bPI, with or without an induction phase with an additional fourth drug (raltegravir or maraviroc) until HIV-RNA undetectability maintained for six months. Blood samples for HIV-RNA, lymphocyte subsets and tropism assessment were obtained at the beginning of the treatment (BL). Patients underwent subsequent six-monthly follow up for clinical outcome, CD4 cell count and HIV-RNA up to 18 months. RESULTS: Median increase in CD4 cells from 0 to 12 months was greater in patients treated during acute (n=18) versus recent (n=7) infection [284/µL, IQR (227–456) versus 176/µL, IQR (70–235); Mann-Whitney test, p=0.046]. This higher value was maintained through 18 months, although failing to reach statistical significance. Patients with acute or recent infection did not significantly differ in virological success (83.3% versus 85.7% at 12 months). We considered CD4 cells gains at six months (multivariate analysis, ANCOVA; Figure 1) and detected an inverse correlation with CD4 levels at BL (r=−0.517; p=0.008) and a direct correlation with the status of acute infection (r=0.234, p NS). This last correlation reached statistical significance at 12 months (r=0.418, p=0.035), whereas the inverse correlation with CD4 levels at BL was still present without a statistical significance (r=−0.350; p=0.072). Patients treated with three or four drugs did not show any significant difference in immunological nor virological response (Mann-Whitney and χ(2) test). Modification or interruption of therapy for tolerability took place in 4 out of 25 patients, all while receiving four drugs; two patients underwent STI between 12 and 18 months following virological success. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of primary infection appeared to be effective in preserving the pool of CD4 cells in acute more than recent infection. There was no evidence of a different outcome through the addition of a fourth drug to the standard treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4225434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42254342014-11-13 Treatment outcome in HIV+ patients receiving 3- or 4-drug regimens during PHI Maria Bottani, Giulia Letizia Oreni, Maria Orofino, Giancarlo Tau, Pamela Di Nardo Stuppino, Silvia Colella, Elisa Carosella, Sinibaldo Guastavigna, Marta Ghisetti, Valeria Micheli, Valeria Galli, Massimo Rusconi, Stefano J Int AIDS Soc Poster Sessions – Abstract P246 INTRODUCTION: The optimal timing and modality of therapeutic intervention during early phases of HIV infection is still debated; in our prospective observational study we evaluated immunological and virological outcome in HIV+ patients treated during acute or recent HIV infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 naïve patients with acute (detectable HIV-RNA, immature Western Blot) or recent (documented infection within six months) HIV infection were recruited at the Infectious Diseases Units of the University of Milan and Turin from 2009 to 2014. Patients received treatment with two NRTIs+one NNRTI/bPI, with or without an induction phase with an additional fourth drug (raltegravir or maraviroc) until HIV-RNA undetectability maintained for six months. Blood samples for HIV-RNA, lymphocyte subsets and tropism assessment were obtained at the beginning of the treatment (BL). Patients underwent subsequent six-monthly follow up for clinical outcome, CD4 cell count and HIV-RNA up to 18 months. RESULTS: Median increase in CD4 cells from 0 to 12 months was greater in patients treated during acute (n=18) versus recent (n=7) infection [284/µL, IQR (227–456) versus 176/µL, IQR (70–235); Mann-Whitney test, p=0.046]. This higher value was maintained through 18 months, although failing to reach statistical significance. Patients with acute or recent infection did not significantly differ in virological success (83.3% versus 85.7% at 12 months). We considered CD4 cells gains at six months (multivariate analysis, ANCOVA; Figure 1) and detected an inverse correlation with CD4 levels at BL (r=−0.517; p=0.008) and a direct correlation with the status of acute infection (r=0.234, p NS). This last correlation reached statistical significance at 12 months (r=0.418, p=0.035), whereas the inverse correlation with CD4 levels at BL was still present without a statistical significance (r=−0.350; p=0.072). Patients treated with three or four drugs did not show any significant difference in immunological nor virological response (Mann-Whitney and χ(2) test). Modification or interruption of therapy for tolerability took place in 4 out of 25 patients, all while receiving four drugs; two patients underwent STI between 12 and 18 months following virological success. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of primary infection appeared to be effective in preserving the pool of CD4 cells in acute more than recent infection. There was no evidence of a different outcome through the addition of a fourth drug to the standard treatment. International AIDS Society 2014-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4225434/ /pubmed/25397522 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19778 Text en © 2014 Maria Bottani G et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Sessions – Abstract P246
Maria Bottani, Giulia
Letizia Oreni, Maria
Orofino, Giancarlo
Tau, Pamela
Di Nardo Stuppino, Silvia
Colella, Elisa
Carosella, Sinibaldo
Guastavigna, Marta
Ghisetti, Valeria
Micheli, Valeria
Galli, Massimo
Rusconi, Stefano
Treatment outcome in HIV+ patients receiving 3- or 4-drug regimens during PHI
title Treatment outcome in HIV+ patients receiving 3- or 4-drug regimens during PHI
title_full Treatment outcome in HIV+ patients receiving 3- or 4-drug regimens during PHI
title_fullStr Treatment outcome in HIV+ patients receiving 3- or 4-drug regimens during PHI
title_full_unstemmed Treatment outcome in HIV+ patients receiving 3- or 4-drug regimens during PHI
title_short Treatment outcome in HIV+ patients receiving 3- or 4-drug regimens during PHI
title_sort treatment outcome in hiv+ patients receiving 3- or 4-drug regimens during phi
topic Poster Sessions – Abstract P246
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25397522
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.4.19778
work_keys_str_mv AT mariabottanigiulia treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT letiziaorenimaria treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT orofinogiancarlo treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT taupamela treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT dinardostuppinosilvia treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT colellaelisa treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT carosellasinibaldo treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT guastavignamarta treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT ghisettivaleria treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT michelivaleria treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT gallimassimo treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi
AT rusconistefano treatmentoutcomeinhivpatientsreceiving3or4drugregimensduringphi