Cargando…

Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and molecular characteristics of 2,079 patients who underwent hereditary cancer multigene panel testing. METHODS: Panels included comprehensive analysis of 14–22 cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2 not included), depending on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LaDuca, Holly, Stuenkel, A J, Dolinsky, Jill S., Keiles, Steven, Tandy, Stephany, Pesaran, Tina, Chen, Elaine, Gau, Chia-Ling, Palmaer, Erika, Shoaepour, Kamelia, Shah, Divya, Speare, Virginia, Gandomi, Stephanie, Chao, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24763289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.40
_version_ 1782343511571431424
author LaDuca, Holly
Stuenkel, A J
Dolinsky, Jill S.
Keiles, Steven
Tandy, Stephany
Pesaran, Tina
Chen, Elaine
Gau, Chia-Ling
Palmaer, Erika
Shoaepour, Kamelia
Shah, Divya
Speare, Virginia
Gandomi, Stephanie
Chao, Elizabeth
author_facet LaDuca, Holly
Stuenkel, A J
Dolinsky, Jill S.
Keiles, Steven
Tandy, Stephany
Pesaran, Tina
Chen, Elaine
Gau, Chia-Ling
Palmaer, Erika
Shoaepour, Kamelia
Shah, Divya
Speare, Virginia
Gandomi, Stephanie
Chao, Elizabeth
author_sort LaDuca, Holly
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and molecular characteristics of 2,079 patients who underwent hereditary cancer multigene panel testing. METHODS: Panels included comprehensive analysis of 14–22 cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2 not included), depending on the panel ordered (BreastNext, OvaNext, ColoNext, or CancerNext). Next-generation sequencing and deletion/duplication analyses were performed for all genes except EPCAM (deletion/duplication analysis only). Clinical histories of ColoNext patients harboring mutations in genes with well-established diagnostic criteria were assessed to determine whether diagnostic/testing criteria were met. RESULTS: Positive rates were defined as the proportion of patients with a pathogenic mutation/likely pathogenic variant(s) and were as follows: 7.4% for BreastNext, 7.2% for OvaNext, 9.2% for ColoNext, and 9.6% for CancerNext. Inconclusive results were found in 19.8% of BreastNext, 25.6% of OvaNext, 15.1% of ColoNext, and 23.5% of CancerNext tests. Based on information submitted by clinicians, 30% of ColoNext patients with mutations in genes with well-established diagnostic criteria did not meet corresponding criteria. CONCLUSION: Our data point to an important role for targeted multigene panels in diagnosing hereditary cancer predisposition, particularly for patients with clinical histories spanning several possible diagnoses and for patients with suspicious clinical histories not meeting diagnostic criteria for a specific hereditary cancer syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4225457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42254572014-11-17 Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients LaDuca, Holly Stuenkel, A J Dolinsky, Jill S. Keiles, Steven Tandy, Stephany Pesaran, Tina Chen, Elaine Gau, Chia-Ling Palmaer, Erika Shoaepour, Kamelia Shah, Divya Speare, Virginia Gandomi, Stephanie Chao, Elizabeth Genet Med Original Research Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and molecular characteristics of 2,079 patients who underwent hereditary cancer multigene panel testing. METHODS: Panels included comprehensive analysis of 14–22 cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2 not included), depending on the panel ordered (BreastNext, OvaNext, ColoNext, or CancerNext). Next-generation sequencing and deletion/duplication analyses were performed for all genes except EPCAM (deletion/duplication analysis only). Clinical histories of ColoNext patients harboring mutations in genes with well-established diagnostic criteria were assessed to determine whether diagnostic/testing criteria were met. RESULTS: Positive rates were defined as the proportion of patients with a pathogenic mutation/likely pathogenic variant(s) and were as follows: 7.4% for BreastNext, 7.2% for OvaNext, 9.2% for ColoNext, and 9.6% for CancerNext. Inconclusive results were found in 19.8% of BreastNext, 25.6% of OvaNext, 15.1% of ColoNext, and 23.5% of CancerNext tests. Based on information submitted by clinicians, 30% of ColoNext patients with mutations in genes with well-established diagnostic criteria did not meet corresponding criteria. CONCLUSION: Our data point to an important role for targeted multigene panels in diagnosing hereditary cancer predisposition, particularly for patients with clinical histories spanning several possible diagnoses and for patients with suspicious clinical histories not meeting diagnostic criteria for a specific hereditary cancer syndrome. Nature Publishing Group 2014-11 2014-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4225457/ /pubmed/24763289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.40 Text en Copyright © 2014 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Research Article
LaDuca, Holly
Stuenkel, A J
Dolinsky, Jill S.
Keiles, Steven
Tandy, Stephany
Pesaran, Tina
Chen, Elaine
Gau, Chia-Ling
Palmaer, Erika
Shoaepour, Kamelia
Shah, Divya
Speare, Virginia
Gandomi, Stephanie
Chao, Elizabeth
Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients
title Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients
title_full Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients
title_fullStr Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients
title_short Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients
title_sort utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24763289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.40
work_keys_str_mv AT laducaholly utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT stuenkelaj utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT dolinskyjills utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT keilessteven utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT tandystephany utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT pesarantina utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT chenelaine utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT gauchialing utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT palmaererika utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT shoaepourkamelia utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT shahdivya utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT spearevirginia utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT gandomistephanie utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients
AT chaoelizabeth utilizationofmultigenepanelsinhereditarycancerpredispositiontestinganalysisofmorethan2000patients