Cargando…

Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A decision of the Federal Joint Committee Germany in 2008 stated that negative pressure wound therapy is not accepted as a standard therapy for full reimbursement by the health insurance companies in Germany. This decision is based on the final report of the Institute for Quality and Eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seidel, Dörthe, Lefering, Rolf, Neugebauer, Edmund AM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24252551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-394
_version_ 1782343521960722432
author Seidel, Dörthe
Lefering, Rolf
Neugebauer, Edmund AM
author_facet Seidel, Dörthe
Lefering, Rolf
Neugebauer, Edmund AM
author_sort Seidel, Dörthe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A decision of the Federal Joint Committee Germany in 2008 stated that negative pressure wound therapy is not accepted as a standard therapy for full reimbursement by the health insurance companies in Germany. This decision is based on the final report of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care in 2006, which demonstrated through systematic reviews and meta-analysis of previous study projects, that an insufficient state of evidence regarding the use of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds exists. Further studies were therefore indicated. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is designed as a multinational, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled, adaptive design, clinical superiority trial, with blinded photographic analysis of the primary endpoint. Efficacy and effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for wounds in both medical sectors (in- and outpatient care) will be evaluated. The trial compares the treatment outcome of the application of a technical medical device which is based on the principle of negative pressure wound therapy (intervention group) and standard conventional wound therapy (control group) in the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery. The aim of the SAWHI-VAC® study is to compare the clinical, safety and economic results of both treatment arms. DISCUSSION: The study project is designed and conducted with the aim of providing solid evidence regarding the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy. Study results will be provided until the end of 2014 to contribute to the final decision of the Federal Joint Committee Germany regarding the general admission of negative pressure wound therapy as a standard of performance within both medical sectors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01528033 German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00000648
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4225503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42255032014-11-11 Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Seidel, Dörthe Lefering, Rolf Neugebauer, Edmund AM Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A decision of the Federal Joint Committee Germany in 2008 stated that negative pressure wound therapy is not accepted as a standard therapy for full reimbursement by the health insurance companies in Germany. This decision is based on the final report of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care in 2006, which demonstrated through systematic reviews and meta-analysis of previous study projects, that an insufficient state of evidence regarding the use of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds exists. Further studies were therefore indicated. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is designed as a multinational, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled, adaptive design, clinical superiority trial, with blinded photographic analysis of the primary endpoint. Efficacy and effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for wounds in both medical sectors (in- and outpatient care) will be evaluated. The trial compares the treatment outcome of the application of a technical medical device which is based on the principle of negative pressure wound therapy (intervention group) and standard conventional wound therapy (control group) in the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery. The aim of the SAWHI-VAC® study is to compare the clinical, safety and economic results of both treatment arms. DISCUSSION: The study project is designed and conducted with the aim of providing solid evidence regarding the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy. Study results will be provided until the end of 2014 to contribute to the final decision of the Federal Joint Committee Germany regarding the general admission of negative pressure wound therapy as a standard of performance within both medical sectors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01528033 German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00000648 BioMed Central 2013-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4225503/ /pubmed/24252551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-394 Text en Copyright © 2013 Seidel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Seidel, Dörthe
Lefering, Rolf
Neugebauer, Edmund AM
Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (sawhi-v.a.c.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24252551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-394
work_keys_str_mv AT seideldorthe treatmentofsubcutaneousabdominalwoundhealingimpairmentaftersurgerywithoutfascialdehiscencebyvacuumassistedclosuresawhivacstudyversusstandardconventionalwoundtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leferingrolf treatmentofsubcutaneousabdominalwoundhealingimpairmentaftersurgerywithoutfascialdehiscencebyvacuumassistedclosuresawhivacstudyversusstandardconventionalwoundtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT neugebaueredmundam treatmentofsubcutaneousabdominalwoundhealingimpairmentaftersurgerywithoutfascialdehiscencebyvacuumassistedclosuresawhivacstudyversusstandardconventionalwoundtherapystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial