Cargando…

In vitro piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene

BACKGROUND: Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is a new ACT that is administered as single daily dose for three days and has been demonstrated to be tolerated and highly effective for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Piperaquine was used alone to replace chloroquine as the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pascual, Aurélie, Madamet, Marilyn, Bertaux, Lionel, Amalvict, Rémy, Benoit, Nicolas, Travers, Dominique, Cren, Julien, Taudon, Nicolas, Rogier, Christophe, Parzy, Daniel, Pradines, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24274185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-431
_version_ 1782343538271322112
author Pascual, Aurélie
Madamet, Marilyn
Bertaux, Lionel
Amalvict, Rémy
Benoit, Nicolas
Travers, Dominique
Cren, Julien
Taudon, Nicolas
Rogier, Christophe
Parzy, Daniel
Pradines, Bruno
author_facet Pascual, Aurélie
Madamet, Marilyn
Bertaux, Lionel
Amalvict, Rémy
Benoit, Nicolas
Travers, Dominique
Cren, Julien
Taudon, Nicolas
Rogier, Christophe
Parzy, Daniel
Pradines, Bruno
author_sort Pascual, Aurélie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is a new ACT that is administered as single daily dose for three days and has been demonstrated to be tolerated and highly effective for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Piperaquine was used alone to replace chloroquine as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in China in response to increasing chloroquine resistance in the 1970s. However, the rapid emergence of piperaquine-resistant strains that resulted in the cessation of its use in China in the 1980s, suggests that there is cross-resistance between piperaquine and chloroquine. Very few data are available on cross-resistance between piperaquine and chloroquine, and the data that do exist are often contradictory. METHODS: In total, 280 P. falciparum isolates, collected between April 2008 and June 2012 from patients hospitalized in France with imported malaria from a malaria-endemic country, were assessed ex vivo for piperaquine and chloroquine susceptibilities by using the standard 42-hour 3H-hypoxanthine uptake inhibition method. The chloroquine resistance-associated mutation K76T in pfcrt was also investigated for the 280 isolates. RESULTS: The IC(50) for piperaquine ranged from 9.8 nM to 217.3 nM (mean = 81.3 nM. The IC(50) for chloroquine ranged from 5.0 nM to 1,918 nM (mean = 83.6 nM. A significant but low correlation was observed between the Log IC(50) values for piperaquine and chloroquine (r = 0.145, p < 0.001). However, the coefficient of determination of 0.021 indicates that only 2.1% of the variation in the response to piperaquine is explained by the variation in the response to chloroquine. The mean value for piperaquine was 74.0 nM in the Pfcrt K76 wild-type group (no = 125) and 87.7 nM in the 76 T mutant group (no = 155). This difference was not significant (p = 0.875, Mann Whitney U test). CONCLUSIONS: The present work demonstrates that there was no cross-resistance between piperaquine and chloroquine among 280 P. falciparum isolates and that piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with pfcrt, the gene involved in chloroquine resistance. These results confirm the efficacy of piperaquine in association with dihydroartemisinin and support its use in areas in which parasites are resistant to chloroquine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4225597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42255972014-11-11 In vitro piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene Pascual, Aurélie Madamet, Marilyn Bertaux, Lionel Amalvict, Rémy Benoit, Nicolas Travers, Dominique Cren, Julien Taudon, Nicolas Rogier, Christophe Parzy, Daniel Pradines, Bruno Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is a new ACT that is administered as single daily dose for three days and has been demonstrated to be tolerated and highly effective for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Piperaquine was used alone to replace chloroquine as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in China in response to increasing chloroquine resistance in the 1970s. However, the rapid emergence of piperaquine-resistant strains that resulted in the cessation of its use in China in the 1980s, suggests that there is cross-resistance between piperaquine and chloroquine. Very few data are available on cross-resistance between piperaquine and chloroquine, and the data that do exist are often contradictory. METHODS: In total, 280 P. falciparum isolates, collected between April 2008 and June 2012 from patients hospitalized in France with imported malaria from a malaria-endemic country, were assessed ex vivo for piperaquine and chloroquine susceptibilities by using the standard 42-hour 3H-hypoxanthine uptake inhibition method. The chloroquine resistance-associated mutation K76T in pfcrt was also investigated for the 280 isolates. RESULTS: The IC(50) for piperaquine ranged from 9.8 nM to 217.3 nM (mean = 81.3 nM. The IC(50) for chloroquine ranged from 5.0 nM to 1,918 nM (mean = 83.6 nM. A significant but low correlation was observed between the Log IC(50) values for piperaquine and chloroquine (r = 0.145, p < 0.001). However, the coefficient of determination of 0.021 indicates that only 2.1% of the variation in the response to piperaquine is explained by the variation in the response to chloroquine. The mean value for piperaquine was 74.0 nM in the Pfcrt K76 wild-type group (no = 125) and 87.7 nM in the 76 T mutant group (no = 155). This difference was not significant (p = 0.875, Mann Whitney U test). CONCLUSIONS: The present work demonstrates that there was no cross-resistance between piperaquine and chloroquine among 280 P. falciparum isolates and that piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with pfcrt, the gene involved in chloroquine resistance. These results confirm the efficacy of piperaquine in association with dihydroartemisinin and support its use in areas in which parasites are resistant to chloroquine. BioMed Central 2013-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4225597/ /pubmed/24274185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-431 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pascual et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Pascual, Aurélie
Madamet, Marilyn
Bertaux, Lionel
Amalvict, Rémy
Benoit, Nicolas
Travers, Dominique
Cren, Julien
Taudon, Nicolas
Rogier, Christophe
Parzy, Daniel
Pradines, Bruno
In vitro piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene
title In vitro piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene
title_full In vitro piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene
title_fullStr In vitro piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene
title_full_unstemmed In vitro piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene
title_short In vitro piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene
title_sort in vitro piperaquine susceptibility is not associated with the plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24274185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-431
work_keys_str_mv AT pascualaurelie invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT madametmarilyn invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT bertauxlionel invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT amalvictremy invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT benoitnicolas invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT traversdominique invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT crenjulien invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT taudonnicolas invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT rogierchristophe invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT parzydaniel invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene
AT pradinesbruno invitropiperaquinesusceptibilityisnotassociatedwiththeplasmodiumfalciparumchloroquineresistancetransportergene