Cargando…

Accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ (1)-minimization

BACKGROUND: The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is responsible for presenting antigens (epitopes) on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). When pathogen-derived epitopes are presented by MHC class II on an APC surface, T cells may be able to trigger an specific immune response. Pred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguilar-Bonavides, Clemente, Sanchez-Arias, Reinaldo, Lanzas, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25392716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-7-23
_version_ 1782343538503057408
author Aguilar-Bonavides, Clemente
Sanchez-Arias, Reinaldo
Lanzas, Cristina
author_facet Aguilar-Bonavides, Clemente
Sanchez-Arias, Reinaldo
Lanzas, Cristina
author_sort Aguilar-Bonavides, Clemente
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is responsible for presenting antigens (epitopes) on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). When pathogen-derived epitopes are presented by MHC class II on an APC surface, T cells may be able to trigger an specific immune response. Prediction of MHC-II epitopes is particularly challenging because the open binding cleft of the MHC-II molecule allows epitopes to bind beyond the peptide binding groove; therefore, the molecule is capable of accommodating peptides of variable length. Among the methods proposed to predict MHC-II epitopes, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs) are the most effective methods. We propose a novel classification algorithm to predict MHC-II called sparse representation via ℓ(1)-minimization. RESULTS: We obtained a collection of experimentally confirmed MHC-II epitopes from the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (IEDB) and applied our ℓ(1)-minimization algorithm. To benchmark the performance of our proposed algorithm, we compared our predictions against a SVM classifier. We measured sensitivity, specificity abd accuracy; then we used Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate the performance of our method. The prediction performance of MHC-II epitopes of the ℓ(1)-minimization algorithm was generally comparable and, in some cases, superior to the standard SVM classification method and overcame the lack of robustness of other methods with respect to outliers. While our method consistently favoured DPPS encoding with the alleles tested, SVM showed a slightly better accuracy when “11-factor” encoding was used. CONCLUSIONS: ℓ(1)-minimization has similar accuracy than SVM, and has additional advantages, such as overcoming the lack of robustness with respect to outliers. With ℓ(1)-minimization no model selection dependency is involved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4225598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42255982014-11-12 Accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ (1)-minimization Aguilar-Bonavides, Clemente Sanchez-Arias, Reinaldo Lanzas, Cristina BioData Min Research BACKGROUND: The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is responsible for presenting antigens (epitopes) on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). When pathogen-derived epitopes are presented by MHC class II on an APC surface, T cells may be able to trigger an specific immune response. Prediction of MHC-II epitopes is particularly challenging because the open binding cleft of the MHC-II molecule allows epitopes to bind beyond the peptide binding groove; therefore, the molecule is capable of accommodating peptides of variable length. Among the methods proposed to predict MHC-II epitopes, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs) are the most effective methods. We propose a novel classification algorithm to predict MHC-II called sparse representation via ℓ(1)-minimization. RESULTS: We obtained a collection of experimentally confirmed MHC-II epitopes from the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (IEDB) and applied our ℓ(1)-minimization algorithm. To benchmark the performance of our proposed algorithm, we compared our predictions against a SVM classifier. We measured sensitivity, specificity abd accuracy; then we used Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate the performance of our method. The prediction performance of MHC-II epitopes of the ℓ(1)-minimization algorithm was generally comparable and, in some cases, superior to the standard SVM classification method and overcame the lack of robustness of other methods with respect to outliers. While our method consistently favoured DPPS encoding with the alleles tested, SVM showed a slightly better accuracy when “11-factor” encoding was used. CONCLUSIONS: ℓ(1)-minimization has similar accuracy than SVM, and has additional advantages, such as overcoming the lack of robustness with respect to outliers. With ℓ(1)-minimization no model selection dependency is involved. BioMed Central 2014-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4225598/ /pubmed/25392716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-7-23 Text en Copyright © 2014 Aguilar-Bonavides et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Aguilar-Bonavides, Clemente
Sanchez-Arias, Reinaldo
Lanzas, Cristina
Accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ (1)-minimization
title Accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ (1)-minimization
title_full Accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ (1)-minimization
title_fullStr Accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ (1)-minimization
title_full_unstemmed Accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ (1)-minimization
title_short Accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ (1)-minimization
title_sort accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class ii epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ (1)-minimization
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25392716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-7-23
work_keys_str_mv AT aguilarbonavidesclemente accuratepredictionofmajorhistocompatibilitycomplexclassiiepitopesbysparserepresentationvial1minimization
AT sanchezariasreinaldo accuratepredictionofmajorhistocompatibilitycomplexclassiiepitopesbysparserepresentationvial1minimization
AT lanzascristina accuratepredictionofmajorhistocompatibilitycomplexclassiiepitopesbysparserepresentationvial1minimization