Cargando…
Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality
BACKGROUND: Inducible defenses are a common and widespread form of phenotypic plasticity. A fundamental factor driving their evolution is an unpredictable and heterogeneous predation pressure. This heterogeneity is often used synonymously to quantitative changes in predation risk, depending on the a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24245584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-113 |
_version_ | 1782343548861939712 |
---|---|
author | Herzog, Quirin Laforsch, Christian |
author_facet | Herzog, Quirin Laforsch, Christian |
author_sort | Herzog, Quirin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inducible defenses are a common and widespread form of phenotypic plasticity. A fundamental factor driving their evolution is an unpredictable and heterogeneous predation pressure. This heterogeneity is often used synonymously to quantitative changes in predation risk, depending on the abundance and impact of predators. However, differences in ‘modality’, that is, the qualitative aspect of natural selection caused by predators, can also cause heterogeneity. For instance, predators of the small planktonic crustacean Daphnia have been divided into two functional groups of predators: vertebrates and invertebrates. Predators of both groups are known to cause different defenses, yet predators of the same group are considered to cause similar responses. In our study we question that thought and address the issue of how multiple predators affect the expression and evolution of inducible defenses. RESULTS: We exposed D. barbata to chemical cues released by Triops cancriformis and Notonecta glauca, respectively. We found for the first time that two invertebrate predators induce different shapes of the same morphological defensive traits in Daphnia, rather than showing gradual or opposing reaction norms. Additionally, we investigated the adaptive value of those defenses in direct predation trials, pairing each morphotype (non-induced, Triops-induced, Notonecta-induced) against the other two and exposed them to one of the two predators. Interestingly, against Triops, both induced morphotypes offered equal protection. To explain this paradox we introduce a ‘concept of modality’ in multipredator regimes. Our concept categorizes two-predator-prey systems into three major groups (functionally equivalent, functionally inverse and functionally diverse). Furthermore, the concept includes optimal responses and costs of maladaptions of prey phenotypes in environments where both predators co-occur or where they alternate. CONCLUSION: With D. barbata, we introduce a new multipredator-prey system with a wide array of morphological inducible defenses. Based on a ‘concept of modality’, we give possible explanations how evolution can favor specialized defenses over a general defense. Additionally, our concept not only helps to classify different multipredator-systems, but also stresses the significance of costs of phenotype-environment mismatching in addition to classic ‘costs of plasticity’. With that, we suggest that ‘modality’ matters as an important factor in understanding and explaining the evolution of inducible defenses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4225664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42256642014-11-11 Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality Herzog, Quirin Laforsch, Christian BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Inducible defenses are a common and widespread form of phenotypic plasticity. A fundamental factor driving their evolution is an unpredictable and heterogeneous predation pressure. This heterogeneity is often used synonymously to quantitative changes in predation risk, depending on the abundance and impact of predators. However, differences in ‘modality’, that is, the qualitative aspect of natural selection caused by predators, can also cause heterogeneity. For instance, predators of the small planktonic crustacean Daphnia have been divided into two functional groups of predators: vertebrates and invertebrates. Predators of both groups are known to cause different defenses, yet predators of the same group are considered to cause similar responses. In our study we question that thought and address the issue of how multiple predators affect the expression and evolution of inducible defenses. RESULTS: We exposed D. barbata to chemical cues released by Triops cancriformis and Notonecta glauca, respectively. We found for the first time that two invertebrate predators induce different shapes of the same morphological defensive traits in Daphnia, rather than showing gradual or opposing reaction norms. Additionally, we investigated the adaptive value of those defenses in direct predation trials, pairing each morphotype (non-induced, Triops-induced, Notonecta-induced) against the other two and exposed them to one of the two predators. Interestingly, against Triops, both induced morphotypes offered equal protection. To explain this paradox we introduce a ‘concept of modality’ in multipredator regimes. Our concept categorizes two-predator-prey systems into three major groups (functionally equivalent, functionally inverse and functionally diverse). Furthermore, the concept includes optimal responses and costs of maladaptions of prey phenotypes in environments where both predators co-occur or where they alternate. CONCLUSION: With D. barbata, we introduce a new multipredator-prey system with a wide array of morphological inducible defenses. Based on a ‘concept of modality’, we give possible explanations how evolution can favor specialized defenses over a general defense. Additionally, our concept not only helps to classify different multipredator-systems, but also stresses the significance of costs of phenotype-environment mismatching in addition to classic ‘costs of plasticity’. With that, we suggest that ‘modality’ matters as an important factor in understanding and explaining the evolution of inducible defenses. BioMed Central 2013-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4225664/ /pubmed/24245584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-113 Text en Copyright © 2013 Herzog and Laforsch; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Herzog, Quirin Laforsch, Christian Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality |
title | Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality |
title_full | Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality |
title_fullStr | Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality |
title_full_unstemmed | Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality |
title_short | Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality |
title_sort | modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24245584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herzogquirin modalitymattersfortheexpressionofinducibledefensesintroducingaconceptofpredatormodality AT laforschchristian modalitymattersfortheexpressionofinducibledefensesintroducingaconceptofpredatormodality |