Cargando…

Effectiveness of Primary Care Triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial problems in children have adverse effects on the children, their families, and society, thus early intervention is important. Community pediatric services offer an ideal setting to detect problem behaviour in children and provide support to parents. The objective of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spijkers, Willem, Jansen, Daniëlle EMC, Reijneveld, Sijmen A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24207163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-240
_version_ 1782343579858894848
author Spijkers, Willem
Jansen, Daniëlle EMC
Reijneveld, Sijmen A
author_facet Spijkers, Willem
Jansen, Daniëlle EMC
Reijneveld, Sijmen A
author_sort Spijkers, Willem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psychosocial problems in children have adverse effects on the children, their families, and society, thus early intervention is important. Community pediatric services offer an ideal setting to detect problem behaviour in children and provide support to parents. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a Primary Care Triple P (PCTP) program compared with care as usual (UC) for parents of children with mild psychosocial problems after an initial, evidence-based screening in routine community pediatric care. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in community pediatric services in the Netherlands, enrolling parents of children with mild psychosocial problems. The population was identified by screening using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) with a cut-off point of 11 or higher (that is, a subclinical score). We compared PCTP with UC, and measured the effects immediately after treatment and after 6 and 12 months. PCTP comprised four individual counseling sessions with the parent of 20 to 30 minutes each. The primary outcome measures were the child psychosocial problems as measured by the SDQ and the Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (ECBI). RESULTS: In total, 81 families were recruited and randomized, and 67 provided post-intervention data. Both treatment groups improved after treatment, with the PCTP group improving only slightly more than the UC group on most measures. The maximum difference on the SDQ was 1.94 (95% CI = −0.30 to 4.19, P = 0.09) and 5.81 (95% CI = −3.37 to 14.99, P = 0.21) on the ECBI (n = 67). None of the differences between PCTP and UC was significant. In the subsidiary analyses, only one of the twenty outcomes (that is, SDQ conduct problems) was significant. CONCLUSIONS: PCTP did produce a reduction in psychosocial problems in children but had no statistically significant advantage over UC. In general, a few outcomes improved in both groups. Based on this admittedly underpowered study, we cannot conclude that PCTP is more effective than UC in preventive child healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register (Dutch Trial Register): NTR1338.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4226010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42260102014-11-11 Effectiveness of Primary Care Triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: a randomized controlled trial Spijkers, Willem Jansen, Daniëlle EMC Reijneveld, Sijmen A BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Psychosocial problems in children have adverse effects on the children, their families, and society, thus early intervention is important. Community pediatric services offer an ideal setting to detect problem behaviour in children and provide support to parents. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a Primary Care Triple P (PCTP) program compared with care as usual (UC) for parents of children with mild psychosocial problems after an initial, evidence-based screening in routine community pediatric care. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in community pediatric services in the Netherlands, enrolling parents of children with mild psychosocial problems. The population was identified by screening using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) with a cut-off point of 11 or higher (that is, a subclinical score). We compared PCTP with UC, and measured the effects immediately after treatment and after 6 and 12 months. PCTP comprised four individual counseling sessions with the parent of 20 to 30 minutes each. The primary outcome measures were the child psychosocial problems as measured by the SDQ and the Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (ECBI). RESULTS: In total, 81 families were recruited and randomized, and 67 provided post-intervention data. Both treatment groups improved after treatment, with the PCTP group improving only slightly more than the UC group on most measures. The maximum difference on the SDQ was 1.94 (95% CI = −0.30 to 4.19, P = 0.09) and 5.81 (95% CI = −3.37 to 14.99, P = 0.21) on the ECBI (n = 67). None of the differences between PCTP and UC was significant. In the subsidiary analyses, only one of the twenty outcomes (that is, SDQ conduct problems) was significant. CONCLUSIONS: PCTP did produce a reduction in psychosocial problems in children but had no statistically significant advantage over UC. In general, a few outcomes improved in both groups. Based on this admittedly underpowered study, we cannot conclude that PCTP is more effective than UC in preventive child healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register (Dutch Trial Register): NTR1338. BioMed Central 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4226010/ /pubmed/24207163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-240 Text en Copyright © 2013 Spijkers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Spijkers, Willem
Jansen, Daniëlle EMC
Reijneveld, Sijmen A
Effectiveness of Primary Care Triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: a randomized controlled trial
title Effectiveness of Primary Care Triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of Primary Care Triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Primary Care Triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Primary Care Triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of Primary Care Triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of primary care triple p on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24207163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-240
work_keys_str_mv AT spijkerswillem effectivenessofprimarycaretripleponchildpsychosocialproblemsinpreventivechildhealthcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jansendanielleemc effectivenessofprimarycaretripleponchildpsychosocialproblemsinpreventivechildhealthcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reijneveldsijmena effectivenessofprimarycaretripleponchildpsychosocialproblemsinpreventivechildhealthcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial