Cargando…
Current ICD10 codes are insufficient to clearly distinguish acute myocardial infarction type: a descriptive study
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) type is an important distinction to be made in both clinical and health care research context, as it determines the treatment of the patient as well as affecting outcomes. The aim of the paper was to determine the feasibility of distinguishing AMI type,...
Autores principales: | Alexandrescu, Roxana, Bottle, Alex, Jarman, Brian, Aylin, Paul |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24195773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-468 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The US hospital standardised mortality ratio: Retrospective database study of Massachusetts hospitals
por: Alexandrescu, Roxana, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
ICD-10 coding algorithms for defining comorbidities of acute myocardial infarction
por: So, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Five‐year survival and use of hospital services following ICD and CRT implantation: comparing real‐world data with RCTs
por: Bottle, Alex, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Welcome to the ICD‐10 code for sarcopenia
por: Anker, Stefan D., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reliability of trauma coding with ICD-10
por: Asadi, Farkhondeh, et al.
Publicado: (2022)