Cargando…

Tissue Quality Assessment Using a Novel Direct Elasticity Assessment Device (The E-Finger): A Cadaveric Study of Prostatectomy Dissection

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP) (robotic and laparoscopic), have brought improvements in the outcomes of RP due to improved views and increased degrees of freedom of surgical devices. Robotic and laparoscopic surgeries do not incorporate haptic feedback, which may result...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Good, Daniel W., Khan, Ashfaq, Hammer, Steven, Scanlan, Paul, Shu, Wenmiao, Phipps, Simon, Parson, Simon H., Stewart, Grant D., Reuben, Robert, McNeill, S. Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25384014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112872
_version_ 1782343649043939328
author Good, Daniel W.
Khan, Ashfaq
Hammer, Steven
Scanlan, Paul
Shu, Wenmiao
Phipps, Simon
Parson, Simon H.
Stewart, Grant D.
Reuben, Robert
McNeill, S. Alan
author_facet Good, Daniel W.
Khan, Ashfaq
Hammer, Steven
Scanlan, Paul
Shu, Wenmiao
Phipps, Simon
Parson, Simon H.
Stewart, Grant D.
Reuben, Robert
McNeill, S. Alan
author_sort Good, Daniel W.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP) (robotic and laparoscopic), have brought improvements in the outcomes of RP due to improved views and increased degrees of freedom of surgical devices. Robotic and laparoscopic surgeries do not incorporate haptic feedback, which may result in complications secondary to inadequate tissue dissection (causing positive surgical margins, rhabdosphincter damage, etc). We developed a micro-engineered device (6 mm(2) sized) [E-finger]) capable of quantitative elasticity assessment, with amplitude ratio, mean ratio and phase lag representing this. The aim was to assess the utility of the device in differentiating peri-prostatic tissue types in order to guide prostate dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two embalmed and 2 fresh frozen cadavers were used in the study. Baseline elasticity values were assessed in bladder, prostate and rhabdosphincter of pre-dissected embalmed cadavers using the micro-engineered device. A measurement grid was created to span from the bladder, across the prostate and onto the rhabdosphincter of fresh frozen cadavers to enable a systematic quantitative elasticity assessment of the entire area by 2 independent assessors. Tissue was sectioned along each row of elasticity measurement points, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Image analysis was performed with Image Pro Premier to determine the histology at each measurement point. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in elasticity were identified between bladder, prostate and sphincter in both embalmed and fresh frozen cadavers (p = <0.001). Intra-class correlation (ICC) reliability tests showed good reliability (average ICC = 0.851). Sensitivity and specificity for tissue identification was 77% and 70% respectively to a resolution of 6 mm(2). CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric study has evaluated the ability of our elasticity assessment device to differentiate bladder, prostate and rhabdosphincter to a resolution of 6 mm(2). The results provide useful data for which to continue to examine the use of elasticity assessment devices for tissue quality assessment with the aim of giving haptic feedback to surgeons performing complex surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4226612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42266122014-11-13 Tissue Quality Assessment Using a Novel Direct Elasticity Assessment Device (The E-Finger): A Cadaveric Study of Prostatectomy Dissection Good, Daniel W. Khan, Ashfaq Hammer, Steven Scanlan, Paul Shu, Wenmiao Phipps, Simon Parson, Simon H. Stewart, Grant D. Reuben, Robert McNeill, S. Alan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP) (robotic and laparoscopic), have brought improvements in the outcomes of RP due to improved views and increased degrees of freedom of surgical devices. Robotic and laparoscopic surgeries do not incorporate haptic feedback, which may result in complications secondary to inadequate tissue dissection (causing positive surgical margins, rhabdosphincter damage, etc). We developed a micro-engineered device (6 mm(2) sized) [E-finger]) capable of quantitative elasticity assessment, with amplitude ratio, mean ratio and phase lag representing this. The aim was to assess the utility of the device in differentiating peri-prostatic tissue types in order to guide prostate dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two embalmed and 2 fresh frozen cadavers were used in the study. Baseline elasticity values were assessed in bladder, prostate and rhabdosphincter of pre-dissected embalmed cadavers using the micro-engineered device. A measurement grid was created to span from the bladder, across the prostate and onto the rhabdosphincter of fresh frozen cadavers to enable a systematic quantitative elasticity assessment of the entire area by 2 independent assessors. Tissue was sectioned along each row of elasticity measurement points, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Image analysis was performed with Image Pro Premier to determine the histology at each measurement point. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in elasticity were identified between bladder, prostate and sphincter in both embalmed and fresh frozen cadavers (p = <0.001). Intra-class correlation (ICC) reliability tests showed good reliability (average ICC = 0.851). Sensitivity and specificity for tissue identification was 77% and 70% respectively to a resolution of 6 mm(2). CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric study has evaluated the ability of our elasticity assessment device to differentiate bladder, prostate and rhabdosphincter to a resolution of 6 mm(2). The results provide useful data for which to continue to examine the use of elasticity assessment devices for tissue quality assessment with the aim of giving haptic feedback to surgeons performing complex surgery. Public Library of Science 2014-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4226612/ /pubmed/25384014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112872 Text en © 2014 Good et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Good, Daniel W.
Khan, Ashfaq
Hammer, Steven
Scanlan, Paul
Shu, Wenmiao
Phipps, Simon
Parson, Simon H.
Stewart, Grant D.
Reuben, Robert
McNeill, S. Alan
Tissue Quality Assessment Using a Novel Direct Elasticity Assessment Device (The E-Finger): A Cadaveric Study of Prostatectomy Dissection
title Tissue Quality Assessment Using a Novel Direct Elasticity Assessment Device (The E-Finger): A Cadaveric Study of Prostatectomy Dissection
title_full Tissue Quality Assessment Using a Novel Direct Elasticity Assessment Device (The E-Finger): A Cadaveric Study of Prostatectomy Dissection
title_fullStr Tissue Quality Assessment Using a Novel Direct Elasticity Assessment Device (The E-Finger): A Cadaveric Study of Prostatectomy Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Tissue Quality Assessment Using a Novel Direct Elasticity Assessment Device (The E-Finger): A Cadaveric Study of Prostatectomy Dissection
title_short Tissue Quality Assessment Using a Novel Direct Elasticity Assessment Device (The E-Finger): A Cadaveric Study of Prostatectomy Dissection
title_sort tissue quality assessment using a novel direct elasticity assessment device (the e-finger): a cadaveric study of prostatectomy dissection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25384014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112872
work_keys_str_mv AT gooddanielw tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection
AT khanashfaq tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection
AT hammersteven tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection
AT scanlanpaul tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection
AT shuwenmiao tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection
AT phippssimon tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection
AT parsonsimonh tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection
AT stewartgrantd tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection
AT reubenrobert tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection
AT mcneillsalan tissuequalityassessmentusinganoveldirectelasticityassessmentdevicetheefingeracadavericstudyofprostatectomydissection